Tribunal secretaries re-examined—comparative legal framework, best practices, and terms of appointment

Q3 Social Sciences
Hans-Patrick Schroeder, Wolfgang Junge
{"title":"Tribunal secretaries re-examined—comparative legal framework, best practices, and terms of appointment","authors":"Hans-Patrick Schroeder, Wolfgang Junge","doi":"10.1093/arbint/aiac004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The tribunal secretary has had a short but stellar career so far. Within 20 years of first being recognized as a wide-spread and potentially problematic phenomenon in international arbitration, it has since been the object of decisions in various jurisdictions, institutional rules, and extensive academic analysis. The authors aim to sort through the different views in an effort to suggest best practices and model terms of appointment.","PeriodicalId":37425,"journal":{"name":"Arbitration International","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arbitration International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/arbint/aiac004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The tribunal secretary has had a short but stellar career so far. Within 20 years of first being recognized as a wide-spread and potentially problematic phenomenon in international arbitration, it has since been the object of decisions in various jurisdictions, institutional rules, and extensive academic analysis. The authors aim to sort through the different views in an effort to suggest best practices and model terms of appointment.
重新审查审裁处秘书——比较法律框架、最佳做法和任命条款
到目前为止,这位法庭秘书的职业生涯虽然短暂,但却很出色。在20年的时间里,它首次被认为是国际仲裁中一个广泛存在且存在潜在问题的现象,自那以来,它已成为各种司法管辖区、制度规则和广泛学术分析的决定对象。作者的目的是整理不同的观点,努力提出最佳做法和模式的任命条款。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Arbitration International
Arbitration International Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊介绍: Launched in 1985, Arbitration International provides quarterly coverage for national and international developments in the world of arbitration. The journal aims to maintain balance between academic debate and practical contributions to the field, providing both topical material on current developments and analytic scholarship of permanent interest. Arbitrators, counsel, judges, scholars and government officials will find the journal enhances their understanding of a broad range of topics in commercial and investment arbitration. Features include (i) articles covering all major arbitration rules and national jurisdictions written by respected international practitioners and scholars, (ii) cutting edge (case) notes covering recent developments and ongoing debates in the field, (iii) book reviews of the latest publications in the world of arbitration, (iv) Letters to the Editor and (v) agora grouping articles related to a common theme. Arbitration International maintains a balance between controversial subjects for debate and topics geared toward practical use by arbitrators, lawyers, academics, judges, corporate advisors and government officials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信