{"title":"Courtship and its Discontents in Greek Literature","authors":"Rebecca Laemmle","doi":"10.1353/ajp.2021.0012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:A number of foundational narratives of archaic Greek culture revolve around courtship competitions in which a multitude of suitors subject themselves to a fierce, often deadly, competition for the hand of one woman. Most retellings of these stories focus on the competition and its outcome, a marriage that typically confirms, and occasionally upsets, the dynastic ambitions and power alliances of the bride's male guardian. Conversely, they offer no more than glimpses of the anxieties brought about by courtship competitions—from the rivalry and jealousy between the competing suitors to the question of the bride's own desire and her interest in the contest's outcome. As this article shows, however, it is the comico-satyrical traditions that fill the gap by providing an explicit, if skewed, commentary which subverts the \"official\" version. The focus here is on the courtships of Helen, Penelope, and Agariste; it is argued that this last case (Herodotus 6.126–131.1) confronts the \"official\" account of the courtship with its satyric double. Courtship narratives are thus shown to reveal not just a way of representing social and political practice, but also the anxieties and social dangers which elite narratives suppress.","PeriodicalId":46128,"journal":{"name":"AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHILOLOGY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHILOLOGY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/ajp.2021.0012","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CLASSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Abstract:A number of foundational narratives of archaic Greek culture revolve around courtship competitions in which a multitude of suitors subject themselves to a fierce, often deadly, competition for the hand of one woman. Most retellings of these stories focus on the competition and its outcome, a marriage that typically confirms, and occasionally upsets, the dynastic ambitions and power alliances of the bride's male guardian. Conversely, they offer no more than glimpses of the anxieties brought about by courtship competitions—from the rivalry and jealousy between the competing suitors to the question of the bride's own desire and her interest in the contest's outcome. As this article shows, however, it is the comico-satyrical traditions that fill the gap by providing an explicit, if skewed, commentary which subverts the "official" version. The focus here is on the courtships of Helen, Penelope, and Agariste; it is argued that this last case (Herodotus 6.126–131.1) confronts the "official" account of the courtship with its satyric double. Courtship narratives are thus shown to reveal not just a way of representing social and political practice, but also the anxieties and social dangers which elite narratives suppress.
期刊介绍:
Founded in 1880, American Journal of Philology (AJP) has helped to shape American classical scholarship. Today, the Journal has achieved worldwide recognition as a forum for international exchange among classicists and philologists by publishing original research in classical literature, philology, linguistics, history, society, religion, philosophy, and cultural and material studies. Book review sections are featured in every issue. AJP is open to a wide variety of contemporary and interdisciplinary approaches, including literary interpretation and theory, historical investigation, and textual criticism.