{"title":"The insurmountable darkness of love: Mysticism, loss, and the common life","authors":"Arthur Holder","doi":"10.1080/20440243.2023.2187962","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"responses when integrating spirituality and religion into our social work practice. A key concern often raised when considering the inclusion of religion and spirituality in social work is that of individual bias and how the biases and beliefs of individual students, lecturers or practitioners will be ‘pushed upon’ students/clients/service-users/colleagues. The strong focus on critical reflective/reflexive practice, encouraging one to identify and challenge biases and to be open and inclusive of other approaches to religion and spirituality as outlined in this text, responds directly to these concerns. As does the significant emphasis on social justice and ethical practice. The dedicated attention to and inclusion of First Nations’ knowledge helps to address issues of cultural competence and anti-discrimination and is particularly relevant for practice in the Australian context (and other colonised countries). Such critical practice was addressed directly and practically in this text as Gardner states, ‘I am starting here with First Nations’ knowledges partly to affirm this equality of place and to seek to redress the balance of these so often being seen as an “add on” rather than a fundamentally important way of seeing the world’ (p. 46). These are notable accomplishments of the text, making a valuable contribution to the social work knowledge base. A critique of Gardner’s critical spiritual practice is that it seems to be a critical approach to practice that allows for the exploration of religion and spirituality and how it impacts clients and practitioners through processes such as critical reflexivity rather than an inclusion of religious or spiritual ways of knowing, being and doing, in their own right. This is perhaps reflective of the concerns held by the discipline regarding the integration of religion and spirituality and, as such, lays another crucial stepping-stone on the path to social work’s inclusion of religion and spirituality in practice. This text helps move the reader along this path to inclusion and provides real-world processes and practices one can immediately begin to use in one’s own practice. Knowing the importance that religion and spirituality hold for many of those we work with, as social workers, it is imperative that we are versed in an appropriate and ethical way to respond, and Gardner’s text provides one pathway to this end.","PeriodicalId":42985,"journal":{"name":"Journal for the Study of Spirituality","volume":"13 1","pages":"88 - 90"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for the Study of Spirituality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20440243.2023.2187962","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
responses when integrating spirituality and religion into our social work practice. A key concern often raised when considering the inclusion of religion and spirituality in social work is that of individual bias and how the biases and beliefs of individual students, lecturers or practitioners will be ‘pushed upon’ students/clients/service-users/colleagues. The strong focus on critical reflective/reflexive practice, encouraging one to identify and challenge biases and to be open and inclusive of other approaches to religion and spirituality as outlined in this text, responds directly to these concerns. As does the significant emphasis on social justice and ethical practice. The dedicated attention to and inclusion of First Nations’ knowledge helps to address issues of cultural competence and anti-discrimination and is particularly relevant for practice in the Australian context (and other colonised countries). Such critical practice was addressed directly and practically in this text as Gardner states, ‘I am starting here with First Nations’ knowledges partly to affirm this equality of place and to seek to redress the balance of these so often being seen as an “add on” rather than a fundamentally important way of seeing the world’ (p. 46). These are notable accomplishments of the text, making a valuable contribution to the social work knowledge base. A critique of Gardner’s critical spiritual practice is that it seems to be a critical approach to practice that allows for the exploration of religion and spirituality and how it impacts clients and practitioners through processes such as critical reflexivity rather than an inclusion of religious or spiritual ways of knowing, being and doing, in their own right. This is perhaps reflective of the concerns held by the discipline regarding the integration of religion and spirituality and, as such, lays another crucial stepping-stone on the path to social work’s inclusion of religion and spirituality in practice. This text helps move the reader along this path to inclusion and provides real-world processes and practices one can immediately begin to use in one’s own practice. Knowing the importance that religion and spirituality hold for many of those we work with, as social workers, it is imperative that we are versed in an appropriate and ethical way to respond, and Gardner’s text provides one pathway to this end.
期刊介绍:
Journal for the Study of Spirituality is a peer-reviewed journal which creates a unique interdisciplinary, inter-professional and cross-cultural forum where researchers, scholars and others engaged in the study and practices of spirituality can share and debate the research, knowledge, wisdom and insight associated with spirituality and contemporary spirituality studies. The British Association for the Study of Spirituality (BASS) organises a biennial international conference and welcomes enquiries about membership from those interested in the study of spirituality in the UK and worldwide. The journal is concerned with what spirituality means, and how it is expressed, in individuals’ lives and communities and in professional practice settings; and with the impact and implications of spirituality in, and on, social policy, organizational practices and personal and professional development. The journal recognises that spirituality and spiritual values can be expressed and studied in secular contexts, including in scientific and professional practice settings, as well as within faith and wisdom traditions. Thus, Journal for the Study of Spirituality particularly welcomes contributions that: identify new agendas for research into spirituality within and across subject disciplines and professions; explore different epistemological and methodological approaches to the study of spirituality; introduce comparative perspectives and insights drawn from different cultures and/or professional practice settings; aim to apply and develop sustained reflection, investigation and critique in relation to spirituality and spiritual practices; critically examine the values and presuppositions underpinning different forms of spirituality and spiritual practices; incorporate different forms of writing and expressions of spirituality.