Motivational factors, learning strategies and competencies in natural sciences

Q4 Medicine
Ángela Yohana Torres López
{"title":"Motivational factors, learning strategies and competencies in natural sciences","authors":"Ángela Yohana Torres López","doi":"10.47307/gmc.2023.131.s3.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is analyzed the relationship between the motivational factors with the learning strategies that the students of the Department of Cauca in Colombia present in front of the basic standards of competencies in Natural Sciences. A non-experimental study was carried out with a quantitative approach, correlational type of study, and cross-sectional study time, with 423 participants. As instruments, the EDAOM, EMPA questionnaires, and the results of the basic standards of competencies in natural sciences according to the ICFES tests were applied. The findings indicate that motivation is not the determining factor for the low results obtained in the ICFES, but learning strategies are, so it is necessary to devise and contribute to creating these to obtain better student results.","PeriodicalId":35684,"journal":{"name":"Gaceta Medica de Caracas","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gaceta Medica de Caracas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47307/gmc.2023.131.s3.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It is analyzed the relationship between the motivational factors with the learning strategies that the students of the Department of Cauca in Colombia present in front of the basic standards of competencies in Natural Sciences. A non-experimental study was carried out with a quantitative approach, correlational type of study, and cross-sectional study time, with 423 participants. As instruments, the EDAOM, EMPA questionnaires, and the results of the basic standards of competencies in natural sciences according to the ICFES tests were applied. The findings indicate that motivation is not the determining factor for the low results obtained in the ICFES, but learning strategies are, so it is necessary to devise and contribute to creating these to obtain better student results.
自然科学的动机因素、学习策略和能力
分析了哥伦比亚考卡系学生在自然科学基本能力标准面前表现出的学习策略与动机因素之间的关系。非实验研究采用定量方法,相关型研究,横断面研究时间,423名参与者。作为工具,采用了EDAOM、EMPA调查表和根据国际教育系统测试得出的自然科学基本能力标准的结果。研究结果表明,动机并不是在ICFES中获得低成绩的决定因素,但学习策略是,因此有必要设计和贡献创造这些,以获得更好的学生成绩。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Gaceta Medica de Caracas
Gaceta Medica de Caracas Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
160
期刊介绍: Gaceta Médica de Caracas Órgano de la Academia Nacional de Medicina y del Congreso Venezolano de Ciencias Médicas Salud Fundada el 13 de marzo de 1893 Trimestral GMC
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信