Comparison Analysis of Brain Image Classification Based on Thresholding Segmentation With Convolutional Neural Network

Q3 Engineering
Alwas Muis, S. Sunardi, A. Yudhana
{"title":"Comparison Analysis of Brain Image Classification Based on Thresholding Segmentation With Convolutional Neural Network","authors":"Alwas Muis, S. Sunardi, A. Yudhana","doi":"10.37385/jaets.v4i2.1583","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Brain tumor is one of the most fatal diseases that can afflict anyone regardless of gender or age necessitating prompt and accurate treatment as well as early discovery of symptoms. Brain tumors can be identified using Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) to detect abnormal tissue or cell development in the brain and surrounding the brain. Biopsy is another option, but it takes approximately 10 to 15 days after the inspection, so technology is required to classify the image. The goal of this study is to conduct a comparative analysis of the greatest accuracy value attained while classifying using segmentation with thresholding versus segmentation without thresholding on the CNN method. Images are assigned threshold values of 150, 100, and 50. The dataset consists of 7023 MRI scans of four types of brain tumors: glioma, notumor, meningioma, and pituitary. Without utilising thresholding segmentation, the classification yielded the highest degree of accuracy, 92%. At the threshold of 100, classification by segmentation received the highest score of 88%. This demonstrates that thresholding segmentation during CNN model preprocessing is less effective for brain image classification","PeriodicalId":34350,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Engineering and Technological Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Engineering and Technological Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37385/jaets.v4i2.1583","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Brain tumor is one of the most fatal diseases that can afflict anyone regardless of gender or age necessitating prompt and accurate treatment as well as early discovery of symptoms. Brain tumors can be identified using Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) to detect abnormal tissue or cell development in the brain and surrounding the brain. Biopsy is another option, but it takes approximately 10 to 15 days after the inspection, so technology is required to classify the image. The goal of this study is to conduct a comparative analysis of the greatest accuracy value attained while classifying using segmentation with thresholding versus segmentation without thresholding on the CNN method. Images are assigned threshold values of 150, 100, and 50. The dataset consists of 7023 MRI scans of four types of brain tumors: glioma, notumor, meningioma, and pituitary. Without utilising thresholding segmentation, the classification yielded the highest degree of accuracy, 92%. At the threshold of 100, classification by segmentation received the highest score of 88%. This demonstrates that thresholding segmentation during CNN model preprocessing is less effective for brain image classification
基于阈值分割与卷积神经网络的脑图像分类比较分析
脑瘤是最致命的疾病之一,它可以折磨任何人,无论性别或年龄,都需要及时准确的治疗以及早期发现症状。脑肿瘤可以使用磁共振成像(MRI)来检测大脑和大脑周围的异常组织或细胞发育。活检是另一种选择,但检查后大约需要10到15天,因此需要技术对图像进行分类。本研究的目的是对CNN方法中使用带阈值的分割与不使用阈值的分割进行分类时获得的最大精度值进行比较分析。图像被分配了150、100和50的阈值。该数据集包括四种类型脑肿瘤的7023次MRI扫描:神经胶质瘤、非肿瘤、脑膜瘤和垂体。在不使用阈值分割的情况下,分类产生了最高的准确度,92%。在100的阈值下,通过分割进行分类获得了88%的最高分数。这表明,在CNN模型预处理过程中,阈值分割对大脑图像分类的效果较差
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信