The functioning of rescue workers in life tasks: development of a test

IF 1.4 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
Heilwine Bakker, M. van Veldhoven, Tony Gaillard, R. Hertogs, Margot Feenstra
{"title":"The functioning of rescue workers in life tasks: development of a test","authors":"Heilwine Bakker, M. van Veldhoven, Tony Gaillard, R. Hertogs, Margot Feenstra","doi":"10.1108/IJES-03-2019-0014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nSince policemen have a highly demanding job, they have a high risk of developing mental health problems, which may have a negative influence on their private life. The purpose of this paper is to present a new questionnaire for measuring the functioning of rescue workers in life tasks outside of work.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe internal consistency, factor structure and concurrent validity of this life tasks test (LTT) were examined in a group of 108 policemen.\n\n\nFindings\nThe test measures perceived effectiveness in the following five domains: social life, maintaining mental health, household and finance, giving meaning and maintaining positivity. Cronbach’s α was acceptable for two scales (>0.60) and good for the other three (>0.70). The hypothesized five-factor structure of the LTT was corroborated in a confirmatory factor analysis. Concurrent validity was examined by correlating the scores on the LTT with two established questionnaires, one for personality characteristics and one for work characteristics and work stress. All LTT scales, with the exception of social life, showed significant correlations with social support, workload and personality.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThis provides support for the concurrent validity of the questionnaire. Practical uses and future research are discussed.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThe items are close to everyday clinical practice. It adds valuable information to the commonly used questionnaires on mental health complaints. The test may also provide insight on which life tasks domains are functioning well and which are in need of attention to improve the effectiveness.\n\n\nSocial implications\nIn both preventive and curative mental health support, it is important to enhance the effectiveness in life tasks, because it works as a buffer for the adversity of rescue work. Moreover, it gives rescue workers mastery of their personal life, makes self-management stronger, as well as it gives feelings of confidence and positive energy.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis is the first questionnaire to be designed and implemented for rescue workers.\n","PeriodicalId":44087,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Emergency Services","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/IJES-03-2019-0014","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Emergency Services","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/IJES-03-2019-0014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose Since policemen have a highly demanding job, they have a high risk of developing mental health problems, which may have a negative influence on their private life. The purpose of this paper is to present a new questionnaire for measuring the functioning of rescue workers in life tasks outside of work. Design/methodology/approach The internal consistency, factor structure and concurrent validity of this life tasks test (LTT) were examined in a group of 108 policemen. Findings The test measures perceived effectiveness in the following five domains: social life, maintaining mental health, household and finance, giving meaning and maintaining positivity. Cronbach’s α was acceptable for two scales (>0.60) and good for the other three (>0.70). The hypothesized five-factor structure of the LTT was corroborated in a confirmatory factor analysis. Concurrent validity was examined by correlating the scores on the LTT with two established questionnaires, one for personality characteristics and one for work characteristics and work stress. All LTT scales, with the exception of social life, showed significant correlations with social support, workload and personality. Research limitations/implications This provides support for the concurrent validity of the questionnaire. Practical uses and future research are discussed. Practical implications The items are close to everyday clinical practice. It adds valuable information to the commonly used questionnaires on mental health complaints. The test may also provide insight on which life tasks domains are functioning well and which are in need of attention to improve the effectiveness. Social implications In both preventive and curative mental health support, it is important to enhance the effectiveness in life tasks, because it works as a buffer for the adversity of rescue work. Moreover, it gives rescue workers mastery of their personal life, makes self-management stronger, as well as it gives feelings of confidence and positive energy. Originality/value This is the first questionnaire to be designed and implemented for rescue workers.
救援人员在生活任务中的作用:一项测试的开发
目的由于警察的工作要求很高,他们出现心理健康问题的风险很高,这可能会对他们的私生活产生负面影响。本文的目的是提出一种新的问卷,用于测量救援人员在工作之外的生活任务中的功能。设计/方法/方法对108名警察的生活任务测试(LTT)的内部一致性、因素结构和并发有效性进行了检验。结果该测试测量了以下五个领域的感知有效性:社交生活、保持心理健康、家庭和财务、赋予意义和保持积极性。Cronbachα在两个量表(>0.60)中是可接受的,在其他三个量表中(>0.70)是好的。LTT的假设五因素结构在验证性因素分析中得到了证实。通过将LTT得分与两份已建立的问卷(一份是人格特征问卷,另一份是工作特征和工作压力问卷)进行关联,来检验并发有效性。除社会生活外,所有LTT量表均与社会支持、工作量和个性显著相关。研究局限性/含义这为问卷的同时有效性提供了支持。讨论了实际应用和未来的研究。实际含义这些项目接近日常临床实践。它为常用的心理健康投诉问卷增加了有价值的信息。该测试还可以深入了解哪些生活任务领域运行良好,哪些需要关注以提高有效性。社会影响在预防性和治疗性心理健康支持中,提高生活任务的有效性很重要,因为它可以缓冲救援工作的逆境。此外,它让救援人员掌握了他们的个人生活,加强了自我管理,也给人信心和正能量。独创性/价值这是第一份为救援人员设计和实施的问卷。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Emergency Services
International Journal of Emergency Services SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
11.10%
发文量
29
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信