Effects of Push-To-Web Mixed Mode Approaches on Survey Response Rates: Evidence from a Randomized Experiment in Emergency Departments

L. Parast, Megan Mathews, M. Elliott, Anagha Tolpadi, Elizabeth Flow-Delwiche, William G. Lehrman, Debra S. Stark, Kirsten M. Becker
{"title":"Effects of Push-To-Web Mixed Mode Approaches on Survey Response Rates: Evidence from a Randomized Experiment in Emergency Departments","authors":"L. Parast, Megan Mathews, M. Elliott, Anagha Tolpadi, Elizabeth Flow-Delwiche, William G. Lehrman, Debra S. Stark, Kirsten M. Becker","doi":"10.29115/SP-2019-0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent work involving survey administration among emergency department (ED) patients has demonstrated very low response rates using single-mode (e.g., mail-only or web-only) approaches. In this study, the authors tested several mixed-mode protocols that focus on a push-to-web approach for survey administration in this challenging but important setting. A random sample of 26,991 ED discharged-to-community (DTC) patients discharged in January 2018–March 2018 from 16 hospital-based EDs nationwide were randomized to nine survey arms, eight of which involved a web survey with one or more of the following methods of invitation to the web survey: an emailed link to the web survey, a texted link to the web survey, and/or a mailed paper invitation with information on how to access the web survey. The reference arm was standard mixed mode (mailed survey with telephone follow-up). Invitation(s) to the web survey was followed by (1) a mailed survey, (2) telephone follow-up, or (3) both. The overall response rate across all arms was 18.6% (American Association for Public Opinion Research [AAPOR] RR1). None of the tested web-survey arms had significantly higher response rates than standard mixed mode (25.5%). Protocol comparisons demonstrated that both text outreach and including a telephone mode increased response rates. When examining response by completion mode, the arms involving text invitation had a higher percentage of completed surveys that were completed by web than arms not involving text invitation. Characteristics (e.g., age) of telephone and web respondents were more representative of the sampled population than mail respondents. Older patients and male patients were significantly less likely to be reachable by email or text. These results demonstrate that sequential multi-mode approaches involving web, mail, and telephone with multiple methods of web survey invitation show the greatest promise for obtaining higher response rates and more representative respondents from the ED population.","PeriodicalId":74893,"journal":{"name":"Survey practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Survey practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29115/SP-2019-0008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Recent work involving survey administration among emergency department (ED) patients has demonstrated very low response rates using single-mode (e.g., mail-only or web-only) approaches. In this study, the authors tested several mixed-mode protocols that focus on a push-to-web approach for survey administration in this challenging but important setting. A random sample of 26,991 ED discharged-to-community (DTC) patients discharged in January 2018–March 2018 from 16 hospital-based EDs nationwide were randomized to nine survey arms, eight of which involved a web survey with one or more of the following methods of invitation to the web survey: an emailed link to the web survey, a texted link to the web survey, and/or a mailed paper invitation with information on how to access the web survey. The reference arm was standard mixed mode (mailed survey with telephone follow-up). Invitation(s) to the web survey was followed by (1) a mailed survey, (2) telephone follow-up, or (3) both. The overall response rate across all arms was 18.6% (American Association for Public Opinion Research [AAPOR] RR1). None of the tested web-survey arms had significantly higher response rates than standard mixed mode (25.5%). Protocol comparisons demonstrated that both text outreach and including a telephone mode increased response rates. When examining response by completion mode, the arms involving text invitation had a higher percentage of completed surveys that were completed by web than arms not involving text invitation. Characteristics (e.g., age) of telephone and web respondents were more representative of the sampled population than mail respondents. Older patients and male patients were significantly less likely to be reachable by email or text. These results demonstrate that sequential multi-mode approaches involving web, mail, and telephone with multiple methods of web survey invitation show the greatest promise for obtaining higher response rates and more representative respondents from the ED population.
推送到网络混合模式对调查回复率的影响:来自急诊科随机实验的证据
最近涉及急诊科(ED)患者调查管理的工作表明,使用单一模式(例如,仅邮件或仅网络)方法的响应率非常低。在这项研究中,作者测试了几种混合模式的协议,这些协议侧重于在这种具有挑战性但重要的环境中进行调查管理的推送网络方法。随机抽取2018年1月至2018年3月从全国16家医院出院的26991名社区(DTC)ED患者,随机分为9个调查组,其中8个调查组采用以下一种或多种邀请方式进行网络调查:网络调查的电子邮件链接、网络调查的短信链接、,和/或带有关于如何访问网络调查的信息的邮寄纸质邀请。参考组采用标准混合模式(邮寄调查和电话随访)。邀请参加网络调查后,(1)邮寄调查,(2)电话跟进,或(3)两者兼有。所有部门的总体响应率为18.6%(美国民意研究协会[APOR]RR1)。没有一个接受测试的网络调查部门的回复率明显高于标准混合模式(25.5%)。协议比较表明,文本外联和包括电话模式都提高了回复率。在按完成方式审查答复时,涉及文本邀请的部门在通过网络完成的调查中所占比例高于不涉及文本邀请部门。电话和网络受访者的特征(如年龄)比邮件受访者更能代表抽样人群。老年患者和男性患者通过电子邮件或短信联系的可能性明显降低。这些结果表明,涉及网络、邮件和电话的顺序多模式方法,以及多种网络调查邀请方法,显示出从ED人群中获得更高响应率和更具代表性的受访者的最大希望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信