A Comparison of Income Support Measures in the Netherlands for Employees and Independent Workers During the Covid Crisis

IF 0.8 Q3 INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR

International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI:10.54648/ijcl2022021

G. Boot

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since the nineties a non-protective policy in the Netherlands stimulated to work as an independent contractor. This resulted in huge numbers of bogus self-employed, because compared to employees they were much cheaper to contract. Since 2012 the intention was spoken out to limit these numbers, but an effective remedy has not yet been developed. During the Covid pandemic, massive financial aid was given to companies, independent workers and employees. This helped to limit the level of unemployment and bankruptcies, but the number of independent workers is still growing. So the financial aid given during the pandemic has not helped to bring bogus self-employed under the scope of the employment agreement. Independent Workers and Employees in the Netherlands: Qualification, Difference in Costs and Financial Aid During Covid-Crisis

查看原文本刊更多论文

新冠肺炎危机期间荷兰对雇员和独立工作者的收入支持措施比较

自90年代以来，荷兰的一项非保护性政策刺激了作为独立承包商的工作。这导致了大量虚假的自营职业者，因为与员工相比，他们的合同成本要低得多。自2012年以来，有人公开表示打算限制这些数字，但尚未制定出有效的补救措施。在新冠肺炎疫情期间，向公司、独立工人和员工提供了大量财政援助。这有助于限制失业和破产的水平，但独立工作者的数量仍在增长。因此，疫情期间提供的财政援助并没有帮助将虚假的自营职业者纳入就业协议的范围。荷兰的独立工人和雇员：新冠疫情期间的资格、成本差异和财政援助

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR-

CiteScore

1.00

自引率

12.50%

发文量

期刊介绍： Published four times a year, the International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations is an essential source of information and analysis for labour lawyers, academics, judges, policymakers and others. The Journal publishes original articles in the domains of labour law (broadly understood) and industrial relations. Articles cover comparative and international (or regional) analysis of topical issues, major developments and innovative practices, as well as discussions of theoretical and methodological approaches. The Journal adopts a double-blind peer review process. A distinguished editorial team, with the support of an International Advisory Board of eminent scholars from around the world, ensures a continuing high standard of scientific research dealing with a range of important issues.