Urgency of Law Amendment as Foundation of The Implementation of Cyber Notary

Devi Alincia, Tundjung Herning Sitabuana
{"title":"Urgency of Law Amendment as Foundation of The Implementation of Cyber Notary","authors":"Devi Alincia, Tundjung Herning Sitabuana","doi":"10.14710/LR.V17I2.41749","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The concept of Cyber Notary in Indonesia is influenced by the advance of technology, the need of the society, and the way people think. Cyber notary is mentioned in the amended Law on Notary (Amended UUJN) in the form of other authorities, which is to certify transaction made electronically (cyber notary). However, in the level of legal practice, cyber notary’s authority is not performed effectively by notaries in real practice. This study aimed to examine the aspect of legal certainty of cyber notary and how far the chance of UUJN’s Amendment is able to provide certainty for the implementation of cyber notary. This study was conducted using normative legal research method, a descriptive method, through statute approach and history approach. The result of this research shows that: first, notary’s authority in cyber notary is merely to legalize an electronic document and privately made deed. The second, the certification of a transaction which is done electronically (cyber notary) by Notary has validity or legally valid and is not against the principle of Tabellionis Officium Fidelliter Exercebo because during the process notaries is present directly. Based on the result of this study, the suggestion that can be given is that it is necessary to amend UUJN and to formulate implementing regulation of the mechanism of notary’s authority to certify electronic transaction.","PeriodicalId":33353,"journal":{"name":"Law Reform Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law Reform Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14710/LR.V17I2.41749","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The concept of Cyber Notary in Indonesia is influenced by the advance of technology, the need of the society, and the way people think. Cyber notary is mentioned in the amended Law on Notary (Amended UUJN) in the form of other authorities, which is to certify transaction made electronically (cyber notary). However, in the level of legal practice, cyber notary’s authority is not performed effectively by notaries in real practice. This study aimed to examine the aspect of legal certainty of cyber notary and how far the chance of UUJN’s Amendment is able to provide certainty for the implementation of cyber notary. This study was conducted using normative legal research method, a descriptive method, through statute approach and history approach. The result of this research shows that: first, notary’s authority in cyber notary is merely to legalize an electronic document and privately made deed. The second, the certification of a transaction which is done electronically (cyber notary) by Notary has validity or legally valid and is not against the principle of Tabellionis Officium Fidelliter Exercebo because during the process notaries is present directly. Based on the result of this study, the suggestion that can be given is that it is necessary to amend UUJN and to formulate implementing regulation of the mechanism of notary’s authority to certify electronic transaction.
法律修改的紧迫性是实施网络公证的基础
印尼网络公证的概念受到技术进步、社会需求和人们思维方式的影响。在修订后的《公证法》(修订后的UUJN)中,以其他机构的形式提到了网络公证,即证明电子交易(网络公证)。然而,在法律实践层面,公证人在实际实践中并没有有效行使网络公证的职权。本研究旨在考察网络公证的法律确定性,以及UUJN修正案在多大程度上能够为网络公证的实施提供确定性。本研究采用规范性法律研究方法,即描述性方法,通过法规法和历史法进行。研究结果表明:第一,公证人在网络公证中的权限仅仅是将电子文件和私人契约合法化。第二,由公证人以电子方式(网络公证)进行的交易证明具有有效性或法律效力,不违反Tabellionis Officium Fidelil Exercebo的原则,因为在此过程中公证人直接在场。根据研究结果,可以提出的建议是,有必要修改UUJN,制定电子交易公证机构认证机制的实施条例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信