A review of pharmacy-led interventions: identification of facilitators and barriers for the design of a new model of care for asthma

IF 1 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Neera Rajballi-Naidoo BSC.Pharm, PGDipHS, MHSc, Kyle John Wilby PharmD, PhD, Amber Young BPharm, PGCertPharm, PGCertGPP, PhD, Alesha Smith BSc, MSc, PhD, MBA
{"title":"A review of pharmacy-led interventions: identification of facilitators and barriers for the design of a new model of care for asthma","authors":"Neera Rajballi-Naidoo BSC.Pharm, PGDipHS, MHSc,&nbsp;Kyle John Wilby PharmD, PhD,&nbsp;Amber Young BPharm, PGCertPharm, PGCertGPP, PhD,&nbsp;Alesha Smith BSc, MSc, PhD, MBA","doi":"10.1002/jppr.1870","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The objective of this narrative review was to determine the facilitators and barriers identified in pharmacy-led interventions that improve outcomes in patients with asthma and support the implementation of interventions in practice. EMBASE, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and PubMed were used to identify 17 relevant articles. Seven studies were randomised controlled studies and 10 were one-arm, pre-post evaluations of all participants enrolled. Questionnaires assessing asthma control, medicine adherence, and knowledge about asthma were used, while checklists were used to assess inhaler technique. Studies with planned interventions in a clinic or general practice setting and lasting for 6 months (compared to longer interventions of 48 weeks) were more successful in retaining participation in the program. Education was the key intervention in which inhaler technique training was the most common. Knowledge about the disease, its aetiology, trigger factors, and medication used were covered in 10 of the studies. Fifteen of the articles reported an improvement in the asthma of patients receiving intervention by the pharmacist, measured by their asthma control test scores, emergency department visits, or reduced emergency steroid prescriptions. This review highlights five key requirements for the success of pharmacy-based interventions for asthma management: (a) developing and maintaining a skilled workforce; (b) close proximation of a general practitioner practice or clinic to the pharmacy; (c) patient education on the disease and medicine; (d) structured and standardised intervention and assessment; and (e) length of the intervention suitable to the pharmacist and the patient.</p>","PeriodicalId":16795,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jppr.1870","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jppr.1870","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objective of this narrative review was to determine the facilitators and barriers identified in pharmacy-led interventions that improve outcomes in patients with asthma and support the implementation of interventions in practice. EMBASE, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and PubMed were used to identify 17 relevant articles. Seven studies were randomised controlled studies and 10 were one-arm, pre-post evaluations of all participants enrolled. Questionnaires assessing asthma control, medicine adherence, and knowledge about asthma were used, while checklists were used to assess inhaler technique. Studies with planned interventions in a clinic or general practice setting and lasting for 6 months (compared to longer interventions of 48 weeks) were more successful in retaining participation in the program. Education was the key intervention in which inhaler technique training was the most common. Knowledge about the disease, its aetiology, trigger factors, and medication used were covered in 10 of the studies. Fifteen of the articles reported an improvement in the asthma of patients receiving intervention by the pharmacist, measured by their asthma control test scores, emergency department visits, or reduced emergency steroid prescriptions. This review highlights five key requirements for the success of pharmacy-based interventions for asthma management: (a) developing and maintaining a skilled workforce; (b) close proximation of a general practitioner practice or clinic to the pharmacy; (c) patient education on the disease and medicine; (d) structured and standardised intervention and assessment; and (e) length of the intervention suitable to the pharmacist and the patient.

Abstract Image

药房主导的干预措施综述:确定哮喘新护理模式设计的促进因素和障碍
这篇叙述性综述的目的是确定在药物主导的干预措施中发现的促进因素和障碍,这些干预措施可以改善哮喘患者的预后,并支持干预措施在实践中的实施。使用EMBASE、Web of Science、b谷歌Scholar和PubMed识别出17篇相关文章。7项研究是随机对照研究,10项是单臂研究,对所有入组参与者进行前后评估。使用问卷评估哮喘控制、药物依从性和哮喘知识,使用检查表评估吸入器技术。在诊所或一般实践环境中进行计划干预的研究,持续6个月(与48周的较长干预相比),更成功地保留了对该计划的参与。教育是最主要的干预措施,其中吸入器技术培训最为常见。其中10项研究涵盖了对这种疾病的了解、病因、触发因素和使用的药物。其中15篇文章报告了接受药剂师干预的患者哮喘的改善,通过他们的哮喘控制测试分数、急诊科就诊或减少紧急类固醇处方来衡量。本综述强调了以药物为基础的哮喘管理干预措施取得成功的五个关键要求:(a)发展和维持一支熟练的劳动力队伍;(b)全科医生的诊所或诊所靠近药房;(c)对患者进行疾病和药物教育;(d)结构化和标准化的干预和评估;(e)适合药剂师和患者的干预时间长度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research
Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research Health Professions-Pharmacy
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
9.50%
发文量
68
期刊介绍: The purpose of this document is to describe the structure, function and operations of the Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research, the official journal of the Society of Hospital Pharmacists of Australia (SHPA). It is owned, published by and copyrighted to SHPA. However, the Journal is to some extent unique within SHPA in that it ‘…has complete editorial freedom in terms of content and is not under the direction of the Society or its Council in such matters…’. This statement, originally based on a Role Statement for the Editor-in-Chief 1993, is also based on the definition of ‘editorial independence’ from the World Association of Medical Editors and adopted by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信