Whose ideas are worth spreading? The representation of women and ethnic groups in TED talks

IF 1.8 Q2 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Carsten Schwemmer, Sebastian Jungkunz
{"title":"Whose ideas are worth spreading? The representation of women and ethnic groups in TED talks","authors":"Carsten Schwemmer, Sebastian Jungkunz","doi":"10.1080/2474736X.2019.1646102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT We investigate the representation of women and ethnic groups in TED talks, which reach a large online audience on YouTube with science-related content and topics on societal change. We argue that gaps in representation can create a misleading perception of science and the respective topics discussed in these talks. We validate annotations from an image recognition algorithm for identifying speaker ethnicity and gender to compile a data set of 2333 TED talks and 1.2 million YouTube comments. Findings show that more than half of all talks were given by white male speakers. While the share of women increased over time, it is constantly low for non-white speakers. Topic modelling further shows that the share of talks addressing inequalities which affect both groups is low, but increasing over time. However, talks about inequalities and those given by female speakers receive substantially more negative sentiment on YouTube than others. Our findings highlight the importance of speaker and topic diversity on digital platforms to reduce stereotypes about scientists and science-related content.","PeriodicalId":20269,"journal":{"name":"Political Research Exchange","volume":"1 1","pages":"1 - 23"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/2474736X.2019.1646102","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Political Research Exchange","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/2474736X.2019.1646102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

ABSTRACT We investigate the representation of women and ethnic groups in TED talks, which reach a large online audience on YouTube with science-related content and topics on societal change. We argue that gaps in representation can create a misleading perception of science and the respective topics discussed in these talks. We validate annotations from an image recognition algorithm for identifying speaker ethnicity and gender to compile a data set of 2333 TED talks and 1.2 million YouTube comments. Findings show that more than half of all talks were given by white male speakers. While the share of women increased over time, it is constantly low for non-white speakers. Topic modelling further shows that the share of talks addressing inequalities which affect both groups is low, but increasing over time. However, talks about inequalities and those given by female speakers receive substantially more negative sentiment on YouTube than others. Our findings highlight the importance of speaker and topic diversity on digital platforms to reduce stereotypes about scientists and science-related content.
谁的想法值得传播?女性和少数民族在TED演讲中的代表性
摘要:我们调查了女性和少数民族在TED演讲中的代表性,这些演讲在YouTube上吸引了大量在线观众,内容涉及科学相关内容和社会变革主题。我们认为,代表性的差距可能会对科学和这些会谈中讨论的各个主题产生误导。我们验证了用于识别说话者种族和性别的图像识别算法的注释,以汇编2333次TED演讲和120万条YouTube评论的数据集。调查结果显示,超过一半的演讲是由白人男性演讲的。虽然女性的比例随着时间的推移而增加,但非白人的比例一直很低。主题建模进一步表明,解决影响两个群体的不平等问题的谈话比例很低,但随着时间的推移会增加。然而,与其他人相比,关于不平等和女性演讲者的言论在YouTube上受到的负面情绪要多得多。我们的研究结果强调了数字平台上演讲者和话题多样性的重要性,以减少对科学家和科学相关内容的刻板印象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Political Research Exchange
Political Research Exchange POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
审稿时长
39 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信