Conditions for cross-professional union coalition-building: When enough is enough, but solidarity also has its limits!

IF 2.3 4区 管理学 Q2 INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR
N. W. Hansen, Nick Krachler
{"title":"Conditions for cross-professional union coalition-building: When enough is enough, but solidarity also has its limits!","authors":"N. W. Hansen, Nick Krachler","doi":"10.1177/0143831x231173462","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Competition between unions whose membership has different skills and professionalization levels is a long-standing issue in the labour movement. This article investigates the conditions for why and how a unique cross-professional coalition of all Danish public-sector unions developed between 2017 and 2018. Operating in a favourable context, unions overcame professionalization differences when skilled brokers primed a common instrumental base as other unionists used a public interest frame to legitimate the coalition and its demands ideologically. However, once the common instrumental concern was met, the coalition collapsed. The article argues that union coalition-building depends on multiple factors comprising both contextual, and identity and relational conditions. The article further argues that adopting a framing that focuses on the public interest over professional self-interest helps to successfully overcome professional cleavages.","PeriodicalId":47456,"journal":{"name":"Economic and Industrial Democracy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economic and Industrial Democracy","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0143831x231173462","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Competition between unions whose membership has different skills and professionalization levels is a long-standing issue in the labour movement. This article investigates the conditions for why and how a unique cross-professional coalition of all Danish public-sector unions developed between 2017 and 2018. Operating in a favourable context, unions overcame professionalization differences when skilled brokers primed a common instrumental base as other unionists used a public interest frame to legitimate the coalition and its demands ideologically. However, once the common instrumental concern was met, the coalition collapsed. The article argues that union coalition-building depends on multiple factors comprising both contextual, and identity and relational conditions. The article further argues that adopting a framing that focuses on the public interest over professional self-interest helps to successfully overcome professional cleavages.
建立跨专业联盟的条件:适可而止,但团结也有其局限性!
工会成员的技能和专业化水平不同,工会之间的竞争是劳工运动中一个长期存在的问题。本文调查了2017年至2018年期间丹麦所有公共部门工会组成的独特跨专业联盟的原因和方式。在有利的背景下,工会克服了专业化的差异,当熟练的经纪人准备了一个共同的工具基础时,其他工会成员使用公共利益框架来使联盟及其要求在意识形态上合法化。然而,一旦共同的工具问题得到满足,联合政府就垮台了。本文认为,工会联盟的建立取决于包括语境、身份和关系条件在内的多种因素。本文进一步认为,采用一种将公众利益置于职业自身利益之上的框架有助于成功克服职业分裂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Economic and Industrial Democracy
Economic and Industrial Democracy INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
13.30%
发文量
51
期刊介绍: Economic and Industrial Democracy is an international peer reviewed journal that focuses on the study of initiatives designed to enhance the quality of working life through extending the democratic control of workers over the workplace and the economy. How those initiatives are affected by wider political, economic and technological factors are also of interest. Special emphasis is laid on international coverage of empirical material, including discussions of the social and economic conditions in various countries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信