Hypersensitivity transfusion reactions to fresh frozen plasma: a retrospective analysis of the French hemovigilance network

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY
Charles Tacquard , Georges Andreu , Nicolas Meyer , Monique Carlier , Jean-Yves Py , Christian Drouet , Jacques Bienvenu , Paul Michel Mertes , Karim Boudjedir
{"title":"Hypersensitivity transfusion reactions to fresh frozen plasma: a retrospective analysis of the French hemovigilance network","authors":"Charles Tacquard ,&nbsp;Georges Andreu ,&nbsp;Nicolas Meyer ,&nbsp;Monique Carlier ,&nbsp;Jean-Yves Py ,&nbsp;Christian Drouet ,&nbsp;Jacques Bienvenu ,&nbsp;Paul Michel Mertes ,&nbsp;Karim Boudjedir","doi":"10.1016/j.tmrv.2022.04.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Few data are currently available on hypersensitivity transfusion reactions (HTRs) after exposure to fresh frozen plasma (FFP). Between 2000 and 2018, three different FFP production strategies have been used in France, leading to the concomitant use of different types of FFP. The objective of this study was to describe the rate of FFP-related HTRs and to assess the relative risk of each type of FFP. HTR following FFP transfusion between 2000 and 2018 were retrospectively extracted from the national hemovigilance database of the French National Agency for Medicines and Health Products Safety (ANSM). Temporal evolution of the incidence of reactions was modeled using logistic regression. During the study period, the overall rate of FFP-related HTRs was 52.0 (95% CI 50.2-53.9) reactions per 100,000 units of FFP issued. The rate of FFP-related HTRs progressively increased over the study period, from 28.7 (95% CI 22.8-36.0) in 2000 to 88.9 (78.8-100.3) reactions per 100,000 units of FFP issued in 2018 (OR 1.08 [1.07 - 1.09], <em>P</em> &lt; .001), whereas the rate of other types of adverse transfusion reactions (ATRs) decreased. Between 2000 and 2014, its period of use, Solvent-Detergent-treated Apheresis FFP (SD-APH) was associated with the lowest risk of HTR. Our results indicate that although the rate of HTRs to FFP is low in France, the risk of having such a reaction has steadily increased between 2000 and 2018. A declarative bias is unlikely as the rate of other type of FFP-related ATRs decreased over the same period. The risk of HTRs to FFP is suggested to differ according to the processing of the FFP with a lower risk for SD-APH.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":56081,"journal":{"name":"Transfusion Medicine Reviews","volume":"36 2","pages":"Pages 77-81"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transfusion Medicine Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0887796322000104","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Few data are currently available on hypersensitivity transfusion reactions (HTRs) after exposure to fresh frozen plasma (FFP). Between 2000 and 2018, three different FFP production strategies have been used in France, leading to the concomitant use of different types of FFP. The objective of this study was to describe the rate of FFP-related HTRs and to assess the relative risk of each type of FFP. HTR following FFP transfusion between 2000 and 2018 were retrospectively extracted from the national hemovigilance database of the French National Agency for Medicines and Health Products Safety (ANSM). Temporal evolution of the incidence of reactions was modeled using logistic regression. During the study period, the overall rate of FFP-related HTRs was 52.0 (95% CI 50.2-53.9) reactions per 100,000 units of FFP issued. The rate of FFP-related HTRs progressively increased over the study period, from 28.7 (95% CI 22.8-36.0) in 2000 to 88.9 (78.8-100.3) reactions per 100,000 units of FFP issued in 2018 (OR 1.08 [1.07 - 1.09], P < .001), whereas the rate of other types of adverse transfusion reactions (ATRs) decreased. Between 2000 and 2014, its period of use, Solvent-Detergent-treated Apheresis FFP (SD-APH) was associated with the lowest risk of HTR. Our results indicate that although the rate of HTRs to FFP is low in France, the risk of having such a reaction has steadily increased between 2000 and 2018. A declarative bias is unlikely as the rate of other type of FFP-related ATRs decreased over the same period. The risk of HTRs to FFP is suggested to differ according to the processing of the FFP with a lower risk for SD-APH.

对新鲜冷冻血浆的超敏输血反应:法国血液警戒网络的回顾性分析
目前关于接触新鲜冷冻血浆(FFP)后的超敏性输血反应(htr)的数据很少。2000年至2018年期间,法国使用了三种不同的FFP生产策略,导致同时使用不同类型的FFP。本研究的目的是描述FFP相关htr的发生率,并评估每种类型FFP的相对风险。从法国国家药品和健康产品安全局(ANSM)的国家血液警戒数据库中回顾性提取2000年至2018年期间FFP输血后的HTR。反应发生率的时间演化采用逻辑回归建模。在研究期间,FFP相关htr的总发生率为52.0 (95% CI 50.2-53.9) / 100000单位FFP。在研究期间,与FFP相关的htr发生率逐渐增加,从2000年的28.7例(95% CI 22.8-36.0)上升到2018年的88.9例(78.8-100.3)例(OR 1.08 [1.07 - 1.09], P <.001),而其他类型的不良输血反应(ATRs)率下降。在2000年至2014年期间,其使用期间,溶剂-洗涤剂处理的Apheresis FFP (SD-APH)与HTR的风险最低相关。我们的研究结果表明,尽管在法国htr到FFP的比率很低,但在2000年至2018年期间,发生这种反应的风险稳步增加。由于其他类型ffp相关atr的发生率在同一时期有所下降,因此不太可能存在声明性偏倚。对于SD-APH风险较低的FFP,建议根据处理的FFP不同,HTRs对FFP的风险不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transfusion Medicine Reviews
Transfusion Medicine Reviews 医学-血液学
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
审稿时长
21 days
期刊介绍: Transfusion Medicine Reviews provides an international forum in English for the publication of scholarly work devoted to the various sub-disciplines that comprise Transfusion Medicine including hemostasis and thrombosis and cellular therapies. The scope of the journal encompasses basic science, practical aspects, laboratory developments, clinical indications, and adverse effects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信