Hume’s Transformation of Academic Skepticism

IF 0.3 4区 哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY
Hume Studies Pub Date : 2022-10-28 DOI:10.1353/hms.2022.0012
Aaron Alexander Zubia
{"title":"Hume’s Transformation of Academic Skepticism","authors":"Aaron Alexander Zubia","doi":"10.1353/hms.2022.0012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Hume described himself as an Academic skeptic and aligned himself with the skepticism of Socrates and Cicero. I argue, though, that Hume transformed the meaning of Academic skepticism by associating it with an experimental rather than dialectical method. In this essay, I distinguish between those aspects of Cicero’s Academic skepticism that Hume adopted and those he discarded in his presentation of mitigated skepticism in the first Enquiry. I then consider the implications of Hume’s transformation of Academic skepticism for Hume’s polite eloquence in the Essays, particularly the essays on happiness, which are often described as possessing “Ciceronian” and “dialectical” elements. Hume’s transformation of Academic skepticism is essential to helping readers understand not only Hume’s alleged neo-Hellenism, but also the aims of his philosophical project.","PeriodicalId":29761,"journal":{"name":"Hume Studies","volume":"47 1","pages":"171 - 201"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hume Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/hms.2022.0012","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:Hume described himself as an Academic skeptic and aligned himself with the skepticism of Socrates and Cicero. I argue, though, that Hume transformed the meaning of Academic skepticism by associating it with an experimental rather than dialectical method. In this essay, I distinguish between those aspects of Cicero’s Academic skepticism that Hume adopted and those he discarded in his presentation of mitigated skepticism in the first Enquiry. I then consider the implications of Hume’s transformation of Academic skepticism for Hume’s polite eloquence in the Essays, particularly the essays on happiness, which are often described as possessing “Ciceronian” and “dialectical” elements. Hume’s transformation of Academic skepticism is essential to helping readers understand not only Hume’s alleged neo-Hellenism, but also the aims of his philosophical project.
休谟对学术怀疑主义的转变
摘要:休谟把自己描述为一个学术怀疑论者,并赞同苏格拉底和西塞罗的怀疑论。然而,我认为,休谟通过将学术怀疑论与实验方法而非辩证方法联系起来,改变了学术怀疑论的含义。在这篇文章中,我区分了西塞罗学术怀疑论的那些方面,休谟采用了这些方面,而他在《第一次询问》中提出的减轻怀疑论则抛弃了这些方面。然后,我考虑了休谟学术怀疑论的转变对休谟在《随笔》中礼貌雄辩的影响,特别是关于幸福的随笔,这些随笔通常被描述为具有“西塞罗式”和“辩证”的元素。休谟对学术怀疑论的转变不仅有助于读者理解休谟所谓的新希腊主义,而且有助于理解他的哲学计划的目的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信