Teaching evidence-based practice: A comparison of two disciplines

IF 0.9 Q3 SOCIAL WORK
D. Marlowe, E. Cannata, Rosalyn M. Bertram, Soo-Whan Choi, S. Kerns
{"title":"Teaching evidence-based practice: A comparison of two disciplines","authors":"D. Marlowe, E. Cannata, Rosalyn M. Bertram, Soo-Whan Choi, S. Kerns","doi":"10.1080/10522158.2019.1694343","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The increasing emphasis on research supported treatments in behavioral health requires clinicians to develop knowledge and skills for evidence-based practice. Graduate professional degree programs must address this in preparation for the emerging workforce. In this paper, we synthesize results from two related studies that examined the extent to which master’s level professional degree programs prepare future practitioners to deliver a process of evidence-based practice or specific evidence-based treatments. We compare these results with a previous study of North American administrators and supervisors who hire graduates from Master's level professional degree programs. The first study explored the Masters in Social Work curricula, and the second study examined Marriage and Family Therapy programs. Professionals with these graduate degrees are primary providers of behavioral health treatment. Results demonstrate how both disciplines are changing and offer both rationale and concerns voiced by program deans and directors. Compared with a study of provider perspectives, the collective results indicate institutions of higher education are providing at least modest levels of training in evidence-based treatments. We conclude with suggestions for university partnership with behavioral health and social service programs.","PeriodicalId":46016,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family Social Work","volume":"23 1","pages":"133 - 150"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10522158.2019.1694343","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Family Social Work","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10522158.2019.1694343","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

ABSTRACT The increasing emphasis on research supported treatments in behavioral health requires clinicians to develop knowledge and skills for evidence-based practice. Graduate professional degree programs must address this in preparation for the emerging workforce. In this paper, we synthesize results from two related studies that examined the extent to which master’s level professional degree programs prepare future practitioners to deliver a process of evidence-based practice or specific evidence-based treatments. We compare these results with a previous study of North American administrators and supervisors who hire graduates from Master's level professional degree programs. The first study explored the Masters in Social Work curricula, and the second study examined Marriage and Family Therapy programs. Professionals with these graduate degrees are primary providers of behavioral health treatment. Results demonstrate how both disciplines are changing and offer both rationale and concerns voiced by program deans and directors. Compared with a study of provider perspectives, the collective results indicate institutions of higher education are providing at least modest levels of training in evidence-based treatments. We conclude with suggestions for university partnership with behavioral health and social service programs.
循证实践教学:两个学科的比较
摘要行为健康中对研究支持治疗的日益重视要求临床医生发展循证实践的知识和技能。研究生专业学位课程必须解决这一问题,为新兴劳动力做好准备。在本文中,我们综合了两项相关研究的结果,这两项研究考察了硕士水平的专业学位课程在多大程度上为未来的从业者提供循证实践或特定的循证治疗。我们将这些结果与之前的一项研究进行了比较,该研究针对的是北美管理人员和主管,他们雇佣的是硕士级专业学位课程的毕业生。第一项研究探讨了社会工作硕士课程,第二项研究考察了婚姻和家庭治疗项目。拥有这些研究生学位的专业人员是行为健康治疗的主要提供者。结果显示了这两个学科是如何变化的,并提供了项目主任和主任表达的理由和担忧。与提供者观点的研究相比,集体结果表明,高等教育机构在循证治疗方面至少提供了适度的培训。最后,我们提出了大学与行为健康和社会服务项目合作的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
期刊介绍: Each issue of the Journal of Family Social Work contains peer reviewed research articles, conceptual and practice articles, creative works, letters to the editor, and book reviews devoted to innovative family theory and practice subjects. In celebrating social workers" tradition of working with couples and families in their life context, the Journal of Family Social Work features articles which advance the capacity of practitioners to integrate research, theory building, and practice wisdom into their services to families. It is a journal of policy, clinical practice, and research directed to the needs of social workers working with couples and families.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信