Análisis comparativo de precios y costos de producción de hortalizas cultivadas de manera orgánica y convencional

Silvia Elena Arce Quesada
{"title":"Análisis comparativo de precios y costos de producción de hortalizas cultivadas de manera orgánica y convencional","authors":"Silvia Elena Arce Quesada","doi":"10.15517/rac.v44i2.43091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"espanolLa presente investigacion es el primer esfuerzo identificado en Costa Rica, que concreta una comparacion de costos de produccion entre hortalizas organicas y convencionales. El proyecto permitio visibilizar los precios de venta, costos unitarios y margenes de ganancia de los productos seleccionados y los comparo entre ambos esquemas de produccion. Objetivo. Esclarecer las causas asignables a la diferencia en precios de venta y costos de produccion entre 6 hortalizas organicas y su homologo convencional. Materiales y metodos. Se formulo un cues- tionario para consultar a 2 grupos de productores, uno conformado por 10 productores de hortalizas organicas y otro por 10 productores dedicados a la produccion convencional. Se formularon 19 preguntas cerradas sobre costos de inversion, costos de produccion, ingresos, relacion costo-beneficio. Las hortalizas seleccionadas fueron culantro (Coriandrum sativum), lechuga (Lactuca sativa), papa (Solanum tuberosum), zanahoria (Daucus carota), apio (Apium graveolens) y brocoli (Brassica oleracea). Los datos registrados fueron agrupados por costos de produccion y precio de venta en ferias del agricultor. Resultados. El precio de venta de los productos organicos por unidad comercializada fue superior al de practicas convencionales en todos los casos. Se logro determinar que la diferencia porcentual en precios para zanahoria fue de 28,57%, apio 40%, 25% para culantro, 53,33% para papa, 33,33% para lechuga y 66,67% para broccoli. Ademas, se evidencio que los productos convencionales presentaron mayor costo total de produccion con respecto a los productos organicos, esto es un 41,70% superior para zanahoria, 65,18% para apio, 29,03% para culantro, 34,78% para papa, 16,65% para lechuga y 44,91% para brocoli. Conclusiones. Las actividades con prac- ticas convencionales expusieron costos superiores, debido a la demanda y compra de insumos externos y a la utilizacion de metodos de transito y rodaje de maquinaria, mientras que la produccion organica propone baja dependencia de compra de insumos externos, ya que los requeridos son generados fundamentalmente en la propia finca y los productores llevan a cabo practicas que promueven la salud del agroecosistema, la biodiversidad y los ciclos biologicos. EnglishThe present investigation is the first effort identified in Costa Rica, which compares production costs between organic and conventional vegetables. The project made visible sale prices, unit costs and profit margins of selected products and compared them between both production schemes. Objective. To clarify the causes that can be assigned to the difference in sale prices and production costs between six organic grown vegetables and their conventional counterpart. Materials and methods. A survey was formulated to consult 2 groups of producers, one consisting of 10 organic vegetable producers and the other of ten dedicated to conventional vegetable production. 19 closed questions were asked about investment and production costs, income, cost- benefit ratio. Selected vegetables were cilantro (Coriandrum sativum), lettuce (Lactuca sativa), potato (Solanum tuberosum), carrot (Daucus carota), celery (Apium graveolens) and broccoli (Brassica oleracea). Recorded data was grouped by production costs and sale prices at farmers markets. Results. Sale prices of organic products per unit sold was higher than that of conventional practices in all cases. It was possible to determine that the percentage difference in prices for carrots was 28.57%, 40% for celery 40%, 25% for cilantro, 53.33% for potatoes, 33.33% for lettuce and 66.67% for broccoli. In addition, conventional products presented higher total cost of production with respect to organic products, this was 41.70% higher for carrots, 65.18% for celery, 29.03% for cilantro, 34.78% for potatoes, 16.65% for lettuce and 44.91% for broccoli. Conclusions. The activities with conventional practices exposed higher costs, due to the demand and purchase of external inputs and the use of machinery, while organic production proposes low dependence on the purchase of external inputs, since those required are mainly generated on the own farm as producers adopt practices that promote the health of the agroecosystem, biodiversity and biological cycles.","PeriodicalId":31178,"journal":{"name":"Agronomia Costarricense","volume":"44 1","pages":"81-108"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agronomia Costarricense","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15517/rac.v44i2.43091","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

espanolLa presente investigacion es el primer esfuerzo identificado en Costa Rica, que concreta una comparacion de costos de produccion entre hortalizas organicas y convencionales. El proyecto permitio visibilizar los precios de venta, costos unitarios y margenes de ganancia de los productos seleccionados y los comparo entre ambos esquemas de produccion. Objetivo. Esclarecer las causas asignables a la diferencia en precios de venta y costos de produccion entre 6 hortalizas organicas y su homologo convencional. Materiales y metodos. Se formulo un cues- tionario para consultar a 2 grupos de productores, uno conformado por 10 productores de hortalizas organicas y otro por 10 productores dedicados a la produccion convencional. Se formularon 19 preguntas cerradas sobre costos de inversion, costos de produccion, ingresos, relacion costo-beneficio. Las hortalizas seleccionadas fueron culantro (Coriandrum sativum), lechuga (Lactuca sativa), papa (Solanum tuberosum), zanahoria (Daucus carota), apio (Apium graveolens) y brocoli (Brassica oleracea). Los datos registrados fueron agrupados por costos de produccion y precio de venta en ferias del agricultor. Resultados. El precio de venta de los productos organicos por unidad comercializada fue superior al de practicas convencionales en todos los casos. Se logro determinar que la diferencia porcentual en precios para zanahoria fue de 28,57%, apio 40%, 25% para culantro, 53,33% para papa, 33,33% para lechuga y 66,67% para broccoli. Ademas, se evidencio que los productos convencionales presentaron mayor costo total de produccion con respecto a los productos organicos, esto es un 41,70% superior para zanahoria, 65,18% para apio, 29,03% para culantro, 34,78% para papa, 16,65% para lechuga y 44,91% para brocoli. Conclusiones. Las actividades con prac- ticas convencionales expusieron costos superiores, debido a la demanda y compra de insumos externos y a la utilizacion de metodos de transito y rodaje de maquinaria, mientras que la produccion organica propone baja dependencia de compra de insumos externos, ya que los requeridos son generados fundamentalmente en la propia finca y los productores llevan a cabo practicas que promueven la salud del agroecosistema, la biodiversidad y los ciclos biologicos. EnglishThe present investigation is the first effort identified in Costa Rica, which compares production costs between organic and conventional vegetables. The project made visible sale prices, unit costs and profit margins of selected products and compared them between both production schemes. Objective. To clarify the causes that can be assigned to the difference in sale prices and production costs between six organic grown vegetables and their conventional counterpart. Materials and methods. A survey was formulated to consult 2 groups of producers, one consisting of 10 organic vegetable producers and the other of ten dedicated to conventional vegetable production. 19 closed questions were asked about investment and production costs, income, cost- benefit ratio. Selected vegetables were cilantro (Coriandrum sativum), lettuce (Lactuca sativa), potato (Solanum tuberosum), carrot (Daucus carota), celery (Apium graveolens) and broccoli (Brassica oleracea). Recorded data was grouped by production costs and sale prices at farmers markets. Results. Sale prices of organic products per unit sold was higher than that of conventional practices in all cases. It was possible to determine that the percentage difference in prices for carrots was 28.57%, 40% for celery 40%, 25% for cilantro, 53.33% for potatoes, 33.33% for lettuce and 66.67% for broccoli. In addition, conventional products presented higher total cost of production with respect to organic products, this was 41.70% higher for carrots, 65.18% for celery, 29.03% for cilantro, 34.78% for potatoes, 16.65% for lettuce and 44.91% for broccoli. Conclusions. The activities with conventional practices exposed higher costs, due to the demand and purchase of external inputs and the use of machinery, while organic production proposes low dependence on the purchase of external inputs, since those required are mainly generated on the own farm as producers adopt practices that promote the health of the agroecosystem, biodiversity and biological cycles.
有机和传统蔬菜生产价格和成本的比较分析
目前的研究是在哥斯达黎加确定的第一个努力,具体比较有机蔬菜和传统蔬菜的生产成本。该项目使所选产品的销售价格、单位成本和利润率可见,并在两种生产方案之间进行比较。目标。确定6种有机蔬菜与传统蔬菜的销售价格和生产成本差异的原因。材料和方法。本研究的目的是确定有机蔬菜生产中使用的有机蔬菜的数量和质量,并确定有机蔬菜生产中使用的有机蔬菜的数量和质量。对19个关于投资成本、生产成本、收入、成本效益关系的封闭式问题进行了调查。选择的蔬菜有芫荽(Coriandrum sativum)、莴苣(Lactuca sativa)、土豆(Solanum tuberosum)、胡萝卜(Daucus carota)、芹菜(Apium graveolens)和花椰菜(Brassica oleracea)。在本研究中,我们分析了在农贸市场上的生产成本和销售价格。结果。在所有情况下,有机产品的单位销售价格都高于传统做法。结果表明,胡萝卜的价格差异为28.57%,芹菜的价格差异为40%,甘蓝的价格差异为25%,土豆的价格差异为53.33%,生菜的价格差异为33.33%,西兰花的价格差异为66.67%。结果表明,传统产品的总生产成本高于有机产品,胡萝卜高41.70%,芹菜高65.18%,甘蓝高29.03%,土豆高34.78%,生菜高16.65%,西兰花高44.91%。结论。常规活动与prac -在了更高的成本,由于外部需求和购买投入物和utilizacion metodos过境和拍摄,而机械的organica提议低股买入所需外部投入,因为主要生成自己的庄园和生产商开展实践,推动卫生系统、生物多样性和biologicos周期。目前的调查是在哥斯达黎加确定的第一个比较有机和传统蔬菜生产成本的努力。该项目使选定产品的销售价格、单位成本和利润率可见,并在两种生产方案之间进行比较。目标。澄清六种有机种植蔬菜与其传统对应产品在销售价格和生产成本方面的差异的原因。他的父亲是一名律师,母亲是一名律师。制定了一项调查,征求两组生产者的意见,其中一组是10个有机蔬菜生产者,另一组是10个传统蔬菜生产者。19个关于投资和生产成本、收入、成本效益比的封闭式问题。选择的蔬菜有香菜(Coriandrum sativum),莴苣(Lactuca sativa),土豆(Solanum tuberosum),胡萝卜(Daucus carota),芹菜(Apium graveolens)和花椰菜(Brassica oleracea)。= =地理= =根据美国人口普查局的数据,该镇总面积为,其中土地和(1.2%)水。结果。有机产品的单位销售价格在所有情况下都高于传统做法。可以确定,胡萝卜的价格差异百分比为28.57%,芹菜40%,香菜25%,土豆53.33%,生菜33.33%,西兰花66.67%。此外,传统产品的总生产成本比有机产品高,胡萝卜高41.70%,芹菜高65.18%,香菜高29.03%,土豆高34.78%,生菜高16.65%,西兰花高44.91%。结论。活动与常规做法暴露上级costs, and purchase of external输入需求和使用机制,而有机生产政见low dependence on The purchase of external输入,因为那些required are mainly generated on The自己农场的as生产商采取做法促进健康of The agroecosystem、多样性和生物周期。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信