Companies as socio-political actors and service providers in social policy

H. Backhaus-Maul, Martin Gibson-Kunze, Daniel Kinderman
{"title":"Companies as socio-political actors and service providers in social policy","authors":"H. Backhaus-Maul, Martin Gibson-Kunze, Daniel Kinderman","doi":"10.1515/zsr-2019-0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This special issue of the Zeitschrift für Sozialreform is dedicated to the dynamic and important, but not very well-theorized relationship between companies and social policy. During the past decades, modern societies have been powerfully shaped by forces of economization and liberalization (Baccaro/Howell 2017; Höpner et al. 2011; Schimank/Volkmann 2008). Companies, market rules and competition, economic criteria and imaginations of governance have steadily increased their importance and influence in capitalist societies all over the world (Backhaus-Maul et al. 2018; Muller 2018; Kinderman 2017; Iversen/Soskice 2015; Hüther et al. 2015; Thelen 2014; Streeck 2013; Golbeck 2012; Crouch 2011; Höpner et al. 2011; Maurer 2008, Maurer/Schimank 2008; Heinze et al. 1997). This trend can be observed – with some cross-national variations (Martin/Swank 2012) – in most areas of politics, public administration and social policy (Busemeyer 2014). One of its manifestations is an increasing gap between ‘insiders’ and ‘outsiders’ in social security and social services (Hassel 2014; Schwander/Häusermann 2013; Emmenegger et al. 2012) and another is the prospect and sometimes the reality of trans-national convergence of social policy in western capitalist democracies (Seeleib-Kaiser 2016). Economization and liberalization within the area of social policy involves the introduction and implementation of business and management ideas and instruments as well as the logics of economic efficiency and effectiveness. The rising number of profit orientated providers of social services is a strong indica-","PeriodicalId":83585,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Sozialreform","volume":"65 1","pages":"205 - 214"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/zsr-2019-0008","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur Sozialreform","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/zsr-2019-0008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This special issue of the Zeitschrift für Sozialreform is dedicated to the dynamic and important, but not very well-theorized relationship between companies and social policy. During the past decades, modern societies have been powerfully shaped by forces of economization and liberalization (Baccaro/Howell 2017; Höpner et al. 2011; Schimank/Volkmann 2008). Companies, market rules and competition, economic criteria and imaginations of governance have steadily increased their importance and influence in capitalist societies all over the world (Backhaus-Maul et al. 2018; Muller 2018; Kinderman 2017; Iversen/Soskice 2015; Hüther et al. 2015; Thelen 2014; Streeck 2013; Golbeck 2012; Crouch 2011; Höpner et al. 2011; Maurer 2008, Maurer/Schimank 2008; Heinze et al. 1997). This trend can be observed – with some cross-national variations (Martin/Swank 2012) – in most areas of politics, public administration and social policy (Busemeyer 2014). One of its manifestations is an increasing gap between ‘insiders’ and ‘outsiders’ in social security and social services (Hassel 2014; Schwander/Häusermann 2013; Emmenegger et al. 2012) and another is the prospect and sometimes the reality of trans-national convergence of social policy in western capitalist democracies (Seeleib-Kaiser 2016). Economization and liberalization within the area of social policy involves the introduction and implementation of business and management ideas and instruments as well as the logics of economic efficiency and effectiveness. The rising number of profit orientated providers of social services is a strong indica-
公司作为社会政治行为者和社会政策的服务提供者
本期《社会改革时代》的特刊致力于探讨公司与社会政策之间动态的、重要的、但没有很好理论化的关系。在过去的几十年里,经济和自由化的力量有力地塑造了现代社会(Baccaro/Howell 2017;Höpner et al. 2011;Schimank /福2008)。公司、市场规则和竞争、经济标准和治理的想象力在世界各地的资本主义社会中稳步增加了它们的重要性和影响力(Backhaus-Maul等人,2018;穆勒2018;Kinderman 2017;球队/ 2015索斯吉斯;h ther et al. 2015;泰伦2014;Streeck 2013;Golbeck 2012;克劳奇2011;Höpner et al. 2011;Maurer 2008, Maurer/Schimank 2008;Heinze et al. 1997)。这种趋势在政治、公共管理和社会政策的大多数领域都可以观察到——有一些跨国差异(Martin/Swank 2012)。其表现之一是在社会保障和社会服务方面,“内部人”和“外部人”之间的差距越来越大(Hassel 2014;Schwander / Hausermann 2013;Emmenegger et al. 2012),另一个是西方资本主义民主国家社会政策跨国趋同的前景,有时是现实(Seeleib-Kaiser 2016)。社会政策领域内的经济化和自由化涉及商业和管理思想和手段的引进和执行,以及经济效率和效益的逻辑。以利润为导向的社会服务提供者数量的增加是一个强有力的指标
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信