Revisiting the Middleton Alienation Scale: In Search of a Cross-Culturally Valid Instrument

IF 1.1 2区 社会学 Q4 SOCIAL SCIENCES, MATHEMATICAL METHODS
Ekaterina I. Lytkina
{"title":"Revisiting the Middleton Alienation Scale: In Search of a Cross-Culturally Valid Instrument","authors":"Ekaterina I. Lytkina","doi":"10.18148/SRM/2020.V14I4.7421","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article contributes to the issue how to deal with measurement non-variance. I address a well-established scale by Middleton (1963) which was created to measure alienation. However, unlike commonly treated in literature, there is evidence that the scale is two-dimensional, and consists of the measures of anomie and alienation. I use the data from two datasets, where the scale was most recently applied, World Values Survey (2011), and Euromodule (1999-2002), for a set of diverse countries representing Western, post-communist, and Eastern societies. The datasets are analyzed separately. Results of confirmatory factor analysis followed by multigroup comparisons give evidence that for a set of countries the two-dimensional scale is applicable or preferable. Full measurement invariance is reached for Russia and Kazakhstan in the World Values Survey, and Slovenia, Switzerland, Germany, Austria, Turkey, and South Korea in the Euromodule. Approximate measurement invariance using Bayesian statistics enabled to reach approximate scalar invariance in Russia and Kazakhstan in the World Values Survey and in Slovenia, and Switzerland in the Euromodule dataset. Additionally, to be sure that the two dimensions are indeed distinct, I used a set of indicators to predict each of the factors.","PeriodicalId":46454,"journal":{"name":"Survey Research Methods","volume":"14 1","pages":"365-397"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Survey Research Methods","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18148/SRM/2020.V14I4.7421","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, MATHEMATICAL METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article contributes to the issue how to deal with measurement non-variance. I address a well-established scale by Middleton (1963) which was created to measure alienation. However, unlike commonly treated in literature, there is evidence that the scale is two-dimensional, and consists of the measures of anomie and alienation. I use the data from two datasets, where the scale was most recently applied, World Values Survey (2011), and Euromodule (1999-2002), for a set of diverse countries representing Western, post-communist, and Eastern societies. The datasets are analyzed separately. Results of confirmatory factor analysis followed by multigroup comparisons give evidence that for a set of countries the two-dimensional scale is applicable or preferable. Full measurement invariance is reached for Russia and Kazakhstan in the World Values Survey, and Slovenia, Switzerland, Germany, Austria, Turkey, and South Korea in the Euromodule. Approximate measurement invariance using Bayesian statistics enabled to reach approximate scalar invariance in Russia and Kazakhstan in the World Values Survey and in Slovenia, and Switzerland in the Euromodule dataset. Additionally, to be sure that the two dimensions are indeed distinct, I used a set of indicators to predict each of the factors.
重新审视米德尔顿异化量表:寻找一种跨文化有效的工具
本文对如何处理度量非方差问题做出了贡献。我谈到了米德尔顿(1963)为衡量异化而创建的一个公认的量表。然而,与文献中通常处理的不同,有证据表明,尺度是二维的,由失范和异化的衡量标准组成。我使用了两个数据集的数据,最近应用了该量表,即世界价值观调查(2011年)和欧洲模块(1999-2002年),用于代表西方、后共产主义和东方社会的一组不同国家。数据集分别进行分析。验证性因素分析和多组比较的结果表明,对于一组国家来说,二维量表是适用的或更可取的。在世界价值调查中,俄罗斯和哈萨克斯坦以及在欧洲模块中的斯洛文尼亚、瑞士、德国、奥地利、土耳其和韩国都达到了完全的测量不变性。使用贝叶斯统计的近似测量不变性使俄罗斯和哈萨克斯坦在世界价值调查中以及斯洛文尼亚和瑞士在Euromodule数据集中达到近似标量不变性。此外,为了确保这两个维度确实是不同的,我使用了一组指标来预测每一个因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Survey Research Methods
Survey Research Methods SOCIAL SCIENCES, MATHEMATICAL METHODS-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
4.20%
发文量
0
审稿时长
52 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信