The use of occupation-based intervention among Malaysian occupational therapists: A focus group discussion

IF 1.6 Q2 Health Professions
Aisyah Ahmad, Padma A. Rahman, K. Tomori, Farahiyah Wan Yunus, M. Romli, A. Z. Che Daud
{"title":"The use of occupation-based intervention among Malaysian occupational therapists: A focus group discussion","authors":"Aisyah Ahmad, Padma A. Rahman, K. Tomori, Farahiyah Wan Yunus, M. Romli, A. Z. Che Daud","doi":"10.1080/14473828.2021.2018835","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Research regarding occupation-based intervention (OBI) has been mainly conducted in developed Western and Asian countries. Therefore, the transferability and generalisability of the published research to the Malaysian context is questionable. The purpose of this study was to examine Malaysian occupational therapists’ perceptions of the developed definition of OBI and how they put it into practice. Three focus group discussions were conducted. Participants were recruited among Malaysian occupation-based practitioners. Data were analysed using a manifest and latent content analysis. The major finding that emerged from the data analysis was the practice of OBI in Malaysia, which was further divided into how OBI is implemented in Malaysia, and the facilitators to practise OBI. This study’s findings suggest that OBI was implemented in various ways by the Malaysian occupational therapists despite agreeing with the developed definition of OBI as occupation as a means and an end.","PeriodicalId":53208,"journal":{"name":"World Federation of Occupational Therapists Bulletin","volume":"79 1","pages":"63 - 71"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Federation of Occupational Therapists Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14473828.2021.2018835","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT Research regarding occupation-based intervention (OBI) has been mainly conducted in developed Western and Asian countries. Therefore, the transferability and generalisability of the published research to the Malaysian context is questionable. The purpose of this study was to examine Malaysian occupational therapists’ perceptions of the developed definition of OBI and how they put it into practice. Three focus group discussions were conducted. Participants were recruited among Malaysian occupation-based practitioners. Data were analysed using a manifest and latent content analysis. The major finding that emerged from the data analysis was the practice of OBI in Malaysia, which was further divided into how OBI is implemented in Malaysia, and the facilitators to practise OBI. This study’s findings suggest that OBI was implemented in various ways by the Malaysian occupational therapists despite agreeing with the developed definition of OBI as occupation as a means and an end.
马来西亚职业治疗师使用基于职业的干预:焦点小组讨论
职业干预(OBI)的研究主要在西方和亚洲发达国家进行。因此,发表的研究在马来西亚背景下的可转移性和普遍性是值得怀疑的。本研究的目的是检验马来西亚职业治疗师对OBI定义的看法,以及他们如何将其付诸实践。进行了三次焦点小组讨论。参与者是在马来西亚职业从业人员中招募的。数据分析采用显性和隐性含量分析。从数据分析中得出的主要发现是马来西亚的OBI实践,这进一步分为如何在马来西亚实施OBI,以及实施OBI的促进者。本研究的结果表明,尽管马来西亚职业治疗师同意将OBI定义为作为手段和目的的职业,但OBI仍以各种方式实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
12.50%
发文量
20
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信