Approaches of General and Specialist Dentists to Deep Caries Management: A Cr Management: A Cross-Sectional Study fr oss-Sectional Study from Turkey

IF 0.2 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
E. Delikan, Ayşe Tuğba Ertürk-Avunduk, seçkin aksu
{"title":"Approaches of General and Specialist Dentists to Deep Caries Management: A Cr Management: A Cross-Sectional Study fr oss-Sectional Study from Turkey","authors":"E. Delikan, Ayşe Tuğba Ertürk-Avunduk, seçkin aksu","doi":"10.14693/jdi.v28i2.1255","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To determine the differences in treatment strategies and material preferences for deep dentine carious lesions (DDCLs) management among general and specialist dentists. Methods: Dentists working in universities, oral and dental health centers, or private practice were administered a 14-item web-based questionnaire regarding demographic and occupational characteristics, approaches to DDLCs, pulp capping methods, and preferences for restorative materials. The data were examined using descriptive statistical analysis and Pearson’s chi-square tests. Results: The study enrolled 298 general and 265 specialist dentists among whom 67.1% were female and 73.3% were aged 25 to 35 years. Total excavation and permanent restoration of DDCLs were the commonly preferred treatments (67.0%), although the pediatric dentists tended toward selective caries removal in these lesions. Mineral trioxide aggregate was used more regularly by the pediatric dentists and endodontists. The pediatric dentists exhibited statistically significantly lower preference for canal treatment than general dentists and endodontists as treatment option for mature teeth with DDCLs (p<0.05). Conclusion: Conservative treatment approaches and material preferences of specialists and general dentists in DDCLs are generally different. The age of dentists, the time since their graduation, place of work and the number of patients they have seen daily may affect the approaches and preferences.","PeriodicalId":53873,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dentistry Indonesia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dentistry Indonesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14693/jdi.v28i2.1255","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To determine the differences in treatment strategies and material preferences for deep dentine carious lesions (DDCLs) management among general and specialist dentists. Methods: Dentists working in universities, oral and dental health centers, or private practice were administered a 14-item web-based questionnaire regarding demographic and occupational characteristics, approaches to DDLCs, pulp capping methods, and preferences for restorative materials. The data were examined using descriptive statistical analysis and Pearson’s chi-square tests. Results: The study enrolled 298 general and 265 specialist dentists among whom 67.1% were female and 73.3% were aged 25 to 35 years. Total excavation and permanent restoration of DDCLs were the commonly preferred treatments (67.0%), although the pediatric dentists tended toward selective caries removal in these lesions. Mineral trioxide aggregate was used more regularly by the pediatric dentists and endodontists. The pediatric dentists exhibited statistically significantly lower preference for canal treatment than general dentists and endodontists as treatment option for mature teeth with DDCLs (p<0.05). Conclusion: Conservative treatment approaches and material preferences of specialists and general dentists in DDCLs are generally different. The age of dentists, the time since their graduation, place of work and the number of patients they have seen daily may affect the approaches and preferences.
普通和专科牙医治疗深龋的方法:Cr治疗:土耳其横断面研究
目的:确定普通牙医和专科牙医在深部牙本质龋坏(DDCL)治疗策略和材料偏好方面的差异。方法:对在大学、口腔和牙科健康中心或私人诊所工作的牙医进行了一份14项基于网络的问卷调查,内容涉及人口统计学和职业特征、DDLC方法、牙髓覆盖方法和对修复材料的偏好。使用描述性统计分析和皮尔逊卡方检验对数据进行检验。结果:该研究招募了298名普通牙医和265名专科牙医,其中67.1%为女性,73.3%为25至35岁。尽管儿科牙医倾向于选择性去除这些病变中的龋齿,但DDCL的完全挖掘和永久修复是通常首选的治疗方法(67.0%)。三氧化二矿物聚集体被儿科牙医和牙髓病学家更经常地使用。在统计学上,儿科牙医对管内治疗的偏好明显低于普通牙医和牙髓病学家,作为DDCL成熟牙齿的治疗选择(p<0.05)。结论:DDCL专家和普通牙医的保守治疗方法和材料偏好通常不同。牙医的年龄、毕业后的时间、工作地点和他们每天看的病人数量可能会影响他们的方法和偏好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Dentistry Indonesia
Journal of Dentistry Indonesia DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信