Global flows of knowledge: expectations toward transnational regulatory aspects of intellectual property rights in the 20th century chemical industry

IF 0.8 4区 管理学 Q1 HISTORY
Louis Pahlow, Michael C. Schneider
{"title":"Global flows of knowledge: expectations toward transnational regulatory aspects of intellectual property rights in the 20th century chemical industry","authors":"Louis Pahlow, Michael C. Schneider","doi":"10.1080/17449359.2019.1683034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Legal and global historical research, especially about the German Empire, has identified an increasing tendency to internationalize the rule making of economic and technical contexts. Also the international protection of intellectual property rights made progress, so it seemed. The Paris Convention of 1883 did not harmonize the different national patent regimes, but intended to facilitate the transnational flow of inventions by a coordinated system of application and novelty. The aim of our paper is to show this limited approach of the Paris convention during the decades to come from two angles: The discussion and growing pressure from the part of the German Industry toward joining the convention, and – after 1903 – the concrete dealing with the convention’s regulation, highlighted with a case study of the 1930s. It shows in detail the dealings between E. Merck, Darmstadt, and its US counterparts, when it came to secure priority rights in several European countries. The case studies show that an efficient transnational use of inventions could not really be achieved by the Paris convention, but rather by a self-regulative contract and patent management of the actors.","PeriodicalId":45724,"journal":{"name":"Management & Organizational History","volume":"14 1","pages":"350 - 365"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17449359.2019.1683034","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Management & Organizational History","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17449359.2019.1683034","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Legal and global historical research, especially about the German Empire, has identified an increasing tendency to internationalize the rule making of economic and technical contexts. Also the international protection of intellectual property rights made progress, so it seemed. The Paris Convention of 1883 did not harmonize the different national patent regimes, but intended to facilitate the transnational flow of inventions by a coordinated system of application and novelty. The aim of our paper is to show this limited approach of the Paris convention during the decades to come from two angles: The discussion and growing pressure from the part of the German Industry toward joining the convention, and – after 1903 – the concrete dealing with the convention’s regulation, highlighted with a case study of the 1930s. It shows in detail the dealings between E. Merck, Darmstadt, and its US counterparts, when it came to secure priority rights in several European countries. The case studies show that an efficient transnational use of inventions could not really be achieved by the Paris convention, but rather by a self-regulative contract and patent management of the actors.
全球知识流动:对20世纪化学工业知识产权跨国监管方面的期望
摘要法律和全球历史研究,特别是关于德意志帝国的研究,已经发现经济和技术背景下的规则制定越来越国际化的趋势。知识产权的国际保护也取得了进展。1883年的《巴黎公约》并没有统一不同的国家专利制度,而是旨在通过协调的申请和新颖性系统促进发明的跨国流动。我们论文的目的是从两个角度展示巴黎公约在未来几十年中的这种有限方法:德国工业界对加入公约的讨论和越来越大的压力,以及1903年之后对公约监管的具体处理,这一点在20世纪30年代的一个案例研究中得到了强调。它详细展示了E.Merck、Darmstadt及其美国同行在几个欧洲国家获得优先权时的交易。案例研究表明,发明的有效跨国使用并不能真正通过《巴黎公约》来实现,而是通过行为者的自律合同和专利管理来实现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
16.70%
发文量
8
期刊介绍: Management & Organizational History (M&OH) is a quarterly, peer-reviewed journal that aims to publish high quality, original, academic research concerning historical approaches to the study of management, organizations and organizing. The journal addresses issues from all areas of management, organization studies, and related fields. The unifying theme of M&OH is its historical orientation. The journal is both empirical and theoretical. It seeks to advance innovative historical methods. It facilitates interdisciplinary dialogue, especially between business and management history and organization theory. The ethos of M&OH is reflective, ethical, imaginative, critical, inter-disciplinary, and international, as well as historical in orientation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信