The Tabernacle Manual: Exodus 25:1–31:18 in Light of the Cuneiform Procedural Genre

IF 0.6 1区 哲学 0 RELIGION
Brian Donnelly-Lewis
{"title":"The Tabernacle Manual: Exodus 25:1–31:18 in Light of the Cuneiform Procedural Genre","authors":"Brian Donnelly-Lewis","doi":"10.15699/jbl.1414.2022.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:The end of the book of Exodus centers on the construction of the tabernacle, both the divine commands and the descriptive fulfillment. While several studies have attempted to explain the form and function of the descriptive fulfillment, the form-critical features of the divine commands have eluded explanation. In this article, I present a form-critical reanalysis of the tabernacle instructions, suggesting that the most salient features of the instructions (second-person directives, technical vocabulary, and descriptive nonrestrictive clauses) accord well with the features of the procedural genre known from Akkadian literature. I compare grammatical, lexical, and pragmatic aspects of the tabernacle instructions to the central features of a variety of \"instruction manuals,\" which include glassmaking and perfume-production manuals. I argue that the similarities between the tabernacle instructions and these manuals from Mesopotamia evidence a shared genre background, making the tabernacle instructions a tabernacle \"manual\" of sorts. The consistency in features additionally presents new evidence for the formal unity of a broad core of texts throughout Exod 25:1–30:10, shedding new light on various segments of the text broadly considered secondary (29:10–46; 30:1–10, 11–17, 23–38; and 31:2–6). The conclusion of the study presents avenues for future inquiry.","PeriodicalId":15251,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biblical Literature","volume":"141 1","pages":"617 - 633"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biblical Literature","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15699/jbl.1414.2022.2","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:The end of the book of Exodus centers on the construction of the tabernacle, both the divine commands and the descriptive fulfillment. While several studies have attempted to explain the form and function of the descriptive fulfillment, the form-critical features of the divine commands have eluded explanation. In this article, I present a form-critical reanalysis of the tabernacle instructions, suggesting that the most salient features of the instructions (second-person directives, technical vocabulary, and descriptive nonrestrictive clauses) accord well with the features of the procedural genre known from Akkadian literature. I compare grammatical, lexical, and pragmatic aspects of the tabernacle instructions to the central features of a variety of "instruction manuals," which include glassmaking and perfume-production manuals. I argue that the similarities between the tabernacle instructions and these manuals from Mesopotamia evidence a shared genre background, making the tabernacle instructions a tabernacle "manual" of sorts. The consistency in features additionally presents new evidence for the formal unity of a broad core of texts throughout Exod 25:1–30:10, shedding new light on various segments of the text broadly considered secondary (29:10–46; 30:1–10, 11–17, 23–38; and 31:2–6). The conclusion of the study presents avenues for future inquiry.
会幕手册:出埃及记25:1-31:18在楔形文字程序体裁的光
摘要:《出埃及记》的结尾集中在帐幕的建造上,包括神圣的命令和描述性的实现。虽然一些研究试图解释描述性实现的形式和功能,但神圣命令的形式批判特征却未能得到解释。在这篇文章中,我对帐幕指令进行了形式批判的重新分析,表明指令的最显著特征(第二人称指令、技术词汇和描述性非限制性从句)与阿卡德文献中已知的程序类型的特征非常一致。我将帐幕说明书的语法、词汇和语用方面与各种“说明书”的核心特征进行了比较,其中包括玻璃制作和香水生产手册。我认为,帐幕说明书和美索不达米亚的这些手册之间的相似之处证明了一个共同的流派背景,使帐幕说明书成为某种程度上的帐幕“手册”。特征的一致性还为整个Exod 25:1-30:10中广泛核心文本的形式统一提供了新的证据,为广泛认为次要的文本的各个部分提供了新线索(29:10-46;30:1-10,11-17,23-38;31:2-6)。该研究的结论为今后的研究提供了途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
16.70%
发文量
30
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信