The Unfinished Web: Transit Planning in Los Angeles, 1895–1953 Part II: 1925–1953

A. Bethel
{"title":"The Unfinished Web: Transit Planning in Los Angeles, 1895–1953 Part II: 1925–1953","authors":"A. Bethel","doi":"10.1525/SCQ.2021.103.1.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Because of its complexity and length this article is organized into two parts. Part I, which appeared in the previous issue of the Quarterly, traced attempts to improve rapid rail transit in Los Angeles from 1895 to 1925.This concluding installment traces the political, civic, and taxpayer response to the 1925 comprehensive regional rapid transit plan. The plan was eclipsed by a seemingly unrelated controversy about a union station for the steam railroads. Meanwhile, though frustrated in its plan for a cross-town subway, the rapid transit provider, the Pacific Electric Railway (PE), was not passive: it worked cooperatively with other public-sector and private-sector agencies to create viaducts that separated its trains from busy intersections, bought new rolling stock, and installed safety measures.The emerging multi-destinational, automobile-oriented city of the 1930s and 1940s led planners to include rail rapid transit in freeway medians, but the politically powerful State Division of Highways opposed it, as did various civic and commercial organizations and the Automobile Club of Southern California (ACSC). Sectional differences in how residents perceived their interests divided city council and state legislature support. PE's management, now discouraged, gradually abandoned and finally sold its passenger service. Part II concludes with an examination of the PE's financial condition in the 1920s in refutation of the often-made claim that the PE's high debt and unprofitable financial account sheets precluded it from making capital investments.","PeriodicalId":82755,"journal":{"name":"Southern California quarterly","volume":"103 1","pages":"5 - 60"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Southern California quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1525/SCQ.2021.103.1.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:Because of its complexity and length this article is organized into two parts. Part I, which appeared in the previous issue of the Quarterly, traced attempts to improve rapid rail transit in Los Angeles from 1895 to 1925.This concluding installment traces the political, civic, and taxpayer response to the 1925 comprehensive regional rapid transit plan. The plan was eclipsed by a seemingly unrelated controversy about a union station for the steam railroads. Meanwhile, though frustrated in its plan for a cross-town subway, the rapid transit provider, the Pacific Electric Railway (PE), was not passive: it worked cooperatively with other public-sector and private-sector agencies to create viaducts that separated its trains from busy intersections, bought new rolling stock, and installed safety measures.The emerging multi-destinational, automobile-oriented city of the 1930s and 1940s led planners to include rail rapid transit in freeway medians, but the politically powerful State Division of Highways opposed it, as did various civic and commercial organizations and the Automobile Club of Southern California (ACSC). Sectional differences in how residents perceived their interests divided city council and state legislature support. PE's management, now discouraged, gradually abandoned and finally sold its passenger service. Part II concludes with an examination of the PE's financial condition in the 1920s in refutation of the often-made claim that the PE's high debt and unprofitable financial account sheets precluded it from making capital investments.
未完成的网络:洛杉矶交通规划,1895–1953第二部分:1925–1953
摘要:由于文章的复杂性和篇幅,本文分为两部分。第一部分出现在《季刊》上一期,追溯了1895年至1925年间洛杉矶改善快速轨道交通的尝试。这篇结尾处的文章追溯了政治、公民和纳税人对1925年全面区域快速交通计划的反应。这个计划被一个看似无关的关于蒸汽铁路联合车站的争议所掩盖。与此同时,尽管跨城地铁计划受挫,但快速交通供应商太平洋电力铁路公司(PE)并不被动:它与其他公共部门和私营机构合作,建造了将列车与繁忙的十字路口隔开的高架桥,购买了新的机车车辆,并安装了安全措施。20世纪30年代和40年代,新兴的多目的地、以汽车为导向的城市促使规划者将铁路快速交通纳入高速公路中间,但政治上强大的国家高速公路部门反对,各种公民和商业组织以及南加州汽车俱乐部(ACSC)也反对。居民如何看待他们的利益的地区差异导致了市议会和州立法机构的支持。PE的管理层现在感到沮丧,逐渐放弃,最终出售了客运业务。第二部分以对20世纪20年代私募股权公司财务状况的考察作为结论,反驳了私募股权公司高负债和无利可图的财务报表使其无法进行资本投资的说法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信