Nascent narratives of Armenian remembrance: The Armenian genocide reflected in the Armenian-American press

IF 1.4 2区 社会学 Q2 ETHNIC STUDIES
Karina Diłanian-Pinkowicz
{"title":"Nascent narratives of Armenian remembrance: The Armenian genocide reflected in the Armenian-American press","authors":"Karina Diłanian-Pinkowicz","doi":"10.1177/14687968221120735","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article explores the cultural memory of the Armenian genocide archived, to a major extent, in non-digitized form. In the initial decades following the genocide, the memory of the crimes committed against Armenians in 1915 was almost non-existent in the public space of America. Monuments, demonstrations, state, and international resolutions, and other instruments of memorialization did not materialize until the 1960s when, as a result of worldwide Armenian mobilization ahead of the 50th anniversary, traces of genocide remembrance were gradually brought to life. Analyzing two Armenian newspapers from the United States – Hairenik Weekly (HW) and The Armenian Mirror-Spectator (AMS) – this paper reveals how Armenians recollected the genocide in the decades preceding the emergence of subsequent lieux de mémoire. What evoked their memories before 1965? And how did narratives change over time, eventually leading to the “exteriorization of Armenian memory”? The case of the Armenian genocide shows that memories of a traumatic event can quickly penetrate the cultural sphere, but remain closed for longer in the narrow framework of a specific community. This had consequences, including an almost complete lack of representation of the genocide in the public domain – one that would be designed by Armenians for non-Armenians. The process of meaning-making (traced through editorials from the two Armenian-American newspapers) influenced a gradual bridging of the representation gap in the American public space, beginning in 1965.","PeriodicalId":47512,"journal":{"name":"Ethnicities","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethnicities","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14687968221120735","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ETHNIC STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This article explores the cultural memory of the Armenian genocide archived, to a major extent, in non-digitized form. In the initial decades following the genocide, the memory of the crimes committed against Armenians in 1915 was almost non-existent in the public space of America. Monuments, demonstrations, state, and international resolutions, and other instruments of memorialization did not materialize until the 1960s when, as a result of worldwide Armenian mobilization ahead of the 50th anniversary, traces of genocide remembrance were gradually brought to life. Analyzing two Armenian newspapers from the United States – Hairenik Weekly (HW) and The Armenian Mirror-Spectator (AMS) – this paper reveals how Armenians recollected the genocide in the decades preceding the emergence of subsequent lieux de mémoire. What evoked their memories before 1965? And how did narratives change over time, eventually leading to the “exteriorization of Armenian memory”? The case of the Armenian genocide shows that memories of a traumatic event can quickly penetrate the cultural sphere, but remain closed for longer in the narrow framework of a specific community. This had consequences, including an almost complete lack of representation of the genocide in the public domain – one that would be designed by Armenians for non-Armenians. The process of meaning-making (traced through editorials from the two Armenian-American newspapers) influenced a gradual bridging of the representation gap in the American public space, beginning in 1965.
亚美尼亚记忆的新生叙事:亚美尼亚裔美国人媒体反映的亚美尼亚种族灭绝
这篇文章探讨了亚美尼亚种族灭绝的文化记忆,在很大程度上是以非数字化的形式存档的。在种族灭绝后的最初几十年里,1915年对亚美尼亚人犯下的罪行的记忆在美国的公共空间中几乎不存在。纪念碑、示威、国家和国际决议以及其他纪念工具直到20世纪60年代才出现,当时,由于亚美尼亚在50周年纪念日前进行了全世界的动员,种族灭绝纪念的痕迹逐渐复活。本文分析了来自美国的两家亚美尼亚报纸——《Hairenik Weekly》(HW)和《亚美尼亚镜报观察家》(AMS)——揭示了亚美尼亚人如何回忆起在随后的《mémoire》出现之前的几十年里的种族灭绝。是什么唤起了他们在1965年之前的记忆?叙事是如何随着时间的推移而改变的,最终导致了“亚美尼亚记忆的外部化”?亚美尼亚种族灭绝的案例表明,对创伤事件的记忆可以迅速渗透到文化领域,但在特定社区的狭窄框架内保持封闭的时间更长。这产生了后果,包括种族灭绝在公共领域几乎完全没有代表性——这将是亚美尼亚人为非亚美尼亚人设计的。从1965年开始,意义的形成过程(通过两家亚美尼亚裔美国报纸的社论追踪)影响了美国公共空间代表性差距的逐步弥合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ethnicities
Ethnicities ETHNIC STUDIES-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
期刊介绍: There is currently a burgeoning interest in both sociology and politics around questions of ethnicity, nationalism and related issues such as identity politics and minority rights. Ethnicities is a cross-disciplinary journal that will provide a critical dialogue between these debates in sociology and politics, and related disciplines. Ethnicities has three broad aims, each of which adds a new and distinctive dimension to the academic analysis of ethnicity, nationalism, identity politics and minority rights.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信