Graduate health professions education programs as they choose to represent themselves: A website review

Janse T Schermerhorn, S. Wilcox, Stephen Durning, Joseph A. Costello, Candace Norton, Holly S. Meyer
{"title":"Graduate health professions education programs as they choose to represent themselves: A website review","authors":"Janse T Schermerhorn, S. Wilcox, Stephen Durning, Joseph A. Costello, Candace Norton, Holly S. Meyer","doi":"10.12688/mep.19498.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: In an age of increasingly face-to-face, blended, and online Health Professions Education, students have more choices of institutions at which to study their degree. For an applicant, oftentimes, the first step is to learn more about a program through its website. Websites allow programs to convey their unique voice and to share their mission and values with others such as applicants, researchers, and academics. Additionally, as the number of health professions education (HPE) programs rapidly grows, websites can share the priorities of these programs.  Methods: In this study, we conducted a website review of 158 HPE websites to explore their geographical distributions, missions, educational concentrations, and various programmatic components. Results: We compiled this information and synthesized pertinent aspects, such as program similarities and differences, or highlighted the omission of critical data. Conclusions: Given that websites are often the first point of contact for prospective applicants, curious collaborators, and potential faculty, the digital image of HPE programs matters. We believe our findings demonstrate opportunities for growth within institutions and assist the field in identifying the priorities of HPE programs. As programs begin to shape their websites with more intentionality, they can reflect their relative divergence/convergence compared to other programs as they see fit and, therefore, attract individuals to best match this identity. Periodic reviews of the breadth of programs, such as those undergone here, are necessary to capture diversifying goals, and serves to help advance the field of HPE as a whole.","PeriodicalId":74136,"journal":{"name":"MedEdPublish (2016)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MedEdPublish (2016)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/mep.19498.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: In an age of increasingly face-to-face, blended, and online Health Professions Education, students have more choices of institutions at which to study their degree. For an applicant, oftentimes, the first step is to learn more about a program through its website. Websites allow programs to convey their unique voice and to share their mission and values with others such as applicants, researchers, and academics. Additionally, as the number of health professions education (HPE) programs rapidly grows, websites can share the priorities of these programs.  Methods: In this study, we conducted a website review of 158 HPE websites to explore their geographical distributions, missions, educational concentrations, and various programmatic components. Results: We compiled this information and synthesized pertinent aspects, such as program similarities and differences, or highlighted the omission of critical data. Conclusions: Given that websites are often the first point of contact for prospective applicants, curious collaborators, and potential faculty, the digital image of HPE programs matters. We believe our findings demonstrate opportunities for growth within institutions and assist the field in identifying the priorities of HPE programs. As programs begin to shape their websites with more intentionality, they can reflect their relative divergence/convergence compared to other programs as they see fit and, therefore, attract individuals to best match this identity. Periodic reviews of the breadth of programs, such as those undergone here, are necessary to capture diversifying goals, and serves to help advance the field of HPE as a whole.
研究生健康专业教育项目,因为他们选择代表自己:一个网站评论
简介:在一个越来越多的面对面、混合和在线健康专业教育的时代,学生有更多的选择来学习他们的学位。对于申请人来说,通常第一步是通过其网站了解更多关于某个项目的信息。网站允许项目传达他们独特的声音,并与申请人、研究人员和学者等其他人分享他们的使命和价值观。此外,随着卫生专业教育(HPE)项目的数量迅速增长,网站可以分享这些项目的优先事项。方法:在本研究中,我们对158个HPE网站进行了网站审查,以探索它们的地理分布、使命、教育集中度和各种计划组成部分。结果:我们汇编了这些信息,并综合了相关方面,如程序的相似性和差异性,或强调了关键数据的遗漏。结论:鉴于网站通常是潜在申请人、好奇的合作者和潜在教师的第一联系点,HPE项目的数字形象很重要。我们相信,我们的研究结果表明了机构内部的增长机会,并有助于该领域确定HPE项目的优先事项。随着程序开始以更具意向性的方式塑造其网站,它们可以反映出与其他程序相比的相对差异/趋同,从而吸引最符合这种身份的个人。定期审查项目的广度,例如在此进行的审查,对于实现多样化的目标是必要的,并有助于推进整个HPE领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
2 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信