Youlim Kim, J. Min, Gajin Lim, Jung-Kyu Lee, Hannah Lee, Jinwoo Lee, Kyung Su Kim, Jong Sun Park, Y. Cho, Y. Jo, H. Rhu, Kyuseok Kim, Sang-Min Lee, Y. Lee
{"title":"Transcultural Adaptation and Validation of the Family Satisfaction in the Intensive Care Unit Questionnaire in a Korean Sample","authors":"Youlim Kim, J. Min, Gajin Lim, Jung-Kyu Lee, Hannah Lee, Jinwoo Lee, Kyung Su Kim, Jong Sun Park, Y. Cho, Y. Jo, H. Rhu, Kyuseok Kim, Sang-Min Lee, Y. Lee","doi":"10.4266/KJCCM.2016.00962","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background A number of questionnaires designed for analyzing family members’ inconvenience and demands in intensive care unit (ICU) care have been developed and validated in North America. The family satisfaction in the intensive care Unit-24 (FS-ICU-24) questionnaire is one of the most widely used of these instruments. This study aimed to translate the FS-ICU-24 questionnaire into Korean and validate the Korean version of the questionnaire. Methods The study was conducted in the medical, surgical, and emergency ICUs at three tertiary hospitals. Relatives of all patients hospitalized for at least 48 hours were enrolled for this study participants. The validation process included the measurement of construct validity, internal consistency, and interrater reliability. The questionnaire consists of 24 items divided between two subscales: satisfaction with care (14 items) and satisfaction with decision making (10 items). Results In total, 200 family members of 176 patients from three hospitals completed the FS-ICU-24 questionnaire. Construct validity for the questionnaire was superior to that observed for a visual analog scale (Spearman’s r = 0.84, p < 0.001). Cronbach’s αs were 0.83 and 0.80 for the satisfaction with care and satisfaction with decision making subscales, respectively. The mean (± standard deviation) total FS-ICU-24 score was 75.44 ± 17.70, and participants were most satisfied with consideration of their needs (82.13 ± 21.03) and least satisfied with the atmosphere in the ICU waiting room (35.38 ± 34.84). Conclusions The Korean version of the FS-ICU-24 questionnaire demonstrated good validity and could be a useful instrument with which to measure family members’ satisfaction about ICU care.","PeriodicalId":31220,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Critical Care Medicine","volume":"32 1","pages":"60 - 69"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4266/KJCCM.2016.00962","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
Abstract
Background A number of questionnaires designed for analyzing family members’ inconvenience and demands in intensive care unit (ICU) care have been developed and validated in North America. The family satisfaction in the intensive care Unit-24 (FS-ICU-24) questionnaire is one of the most widely used of these instruments. This study aimed to translate the FS-ICU-24 questionnaire into Korean and validate the Korean version of the questionnaire. Methods The study was conducted in the medical, surgical, and emergency ICUs at three tertiary hospitals. Relatives of all patients hospitalized for at least 48 hours were enrolled for this study participants. The validation process included the measurement of construct validity, internal consistency, and interrater reliability. The questionnaire consists of 24 items divided between two subscales: satisfaction with care (14 items) and satisfaction with decision making (10 items). Results In total, 200 family members of 176 patients from three hospitals completed the FS-ICU-24 questionnaire. Construct validity for the questionnaire was superior to that observed for a visual analog scale (Spearman’s r = 0.84, p < 0.001). Cronbach’s αs were 0.83 and 0.80 for the satisfaction with care and satisfaction with decision making subscales, respectively. The mean (± standard deviation) total FS-ICU-24 score was 75.44 ± 17.70, and participants were most satisfied with consideration of their needs (82.13 ± 21.03) and least satisfied with the atmosphere in the ICU waiting room (35.38 ± 34.84). Conclusions The Korean version of the FS-ICU-24 questionnaire demonstrated good validity and could be a useful instrument with which to measure family members’ satisfaction about ICU care.
北美已经开发并验证了一些旨在分析家庭成员在重症监护病房(ICU)护理中的不便和需求的问卷。重症监护病房-24 (FS-ICU-24)家庭满意度问卷是这些工具中应用最广泛的一种。本研究旨在将FS-ICU-24问卷翻译成韩文,并验证问卷的韩文版本。方法在三所三级医院内科、外科和急诊科进行研究。所有住院至少48小时的患者的亲属被纳入本研究的参与者。验证过程包括构念效度、内部一致性和解释者间信度的测量。问卷共24个条目,分为关怀满意度(14个条目)和决策满意度(10个条目)两个分量表。结果共有3家医院176例患者200名家属填写了FS-ICU-24问卷。问卷的结构效度优于视觉模拟量表(Spearman’s r = 0.84, p < 0.001)。护理满意度和决策满意度的Cronbach αs分别为0.83和0.80。FS-ICU-24评分的平均值(±标准差)为75.44±17.70,其中最满意的是对患者需求的考虑(82.13±21.03),最不满意的是ICU候诊室的气氛(35.38±34.84)。结论韩国版FS-ICU-24问卷具有良好的效度,可作为衡量家庭成员对ICU护理满意度的有效工具。