If Not Now, Then When? The Significance of CISG Ratification for Indonesia

R. Wulandari
{"title":"If Not Now, Then When? The Significance of CISG Ratification for Indonesia","authors":"R. Wulandari","doi":"10.26555/NOVELTY.V12I01.A19509","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction to The Problem: In this 21st century, Indonesia has not ratified the United Nations on Contract for the International Sales of Goods (CISG). Indonesia’s government put several reasons for not becoming part of this critical convention, and the government did not see the ratification as urgent matters. However, these excuses did not find relevant anymore because more and more countries worldwide ratified the CISG, including North Korea. Purpose/Objective Study: The objective of this article is addressing the issue of Indonesia has not yet ratify the United Nations on Contract for the International Sales of Goods (CISG) despite the rise of export and import activities conducted by Indonesian enterprises. Design/Methodology/Approach: The methodology used in this article is based on the literature review of CISG, Indonesian development of CISG, and minor comparative analysis between the signatory and non-signatory countries. Findings: The ratification of CISG would provide more benefits and outweighed its disadvantages because CISG presents legal certainty to international contract law since the Indonesian Civil Code failed to address this issue. CISG ratification will also strengthen the Indonesian legal system, legal institutions, and legal practitioners. Paper Type: Research Article","PeriodicalId":32116,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Hukum Novelty","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Hukum Novelty","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26555/NOVELTY.V12I01.A19509","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction to The Problem: In this 21st century, Indonesia has not ratified the United Nations on Contract for the International Sales of Goods (CISG). Indonesia’s government put several reasons for not becoming part of this critical convention, and the government did not see the ratification as urgent matters. However, these excuses did not find relevant anymore because more and more countries worldwide ratified the CISG, including North Korea. Purpose/Objective Study: The objective of this article is addressing the issue of Indonesia has not yet ratify the United Nations on Contract for the International Sales of Goods (CISG) despite the rise of export and import activities conducted by Indonesian enterprises. Design/Methodology/Approach: The methodology used in this article is based on the literature review of CISG, Indonesian development of CISG, and minor comparative analysis between the signatory and non-signatory countries. Findings: The ratification of CISG would provide more benefits and outweighed its disadvantages because CISG presents legal certainty to international contract law since the Indonesian Civil Code failed to address this issue. CISG ratification will also strengthen the Indonesian legal system, legal institutions, and legal practitioners. Paper Type: Research Article
如果不是现在,那又是何时?批准《销售公约》对印度尼西亚的意义
问题简介:在21世纪,印度尼西亚还没有批准《联合国国际货物销售合同公约》(CISG)。印尼政府提出了几个不加入这一重要公约的理由,而且政府并不认为批准该公约是当务之急。但是,随着包括北韩在内的世界范围内批准《公约》的国家越来越多,这些借口已经失去了意义。目的/目标研究:本文的目的是处理印度尼西亚尚未批准《联合国国际货物销售合同》(《销售公约》)的问题,尽管印度尼西亚企业开展的进出口活动有所增加。设计/方法/途径:本文使用的方法是基于对CISG的文献综述,印度尼西亚的CISG发展,以及签约国和非签约国之间的小型比较分析。结论:批准《销售公约》将带来更多的好处,弊大于利,因为《销售公约》为国际合同法提供了法律确定性,因为《印度尼西亚民法典》未能解决这一问题。批准《销售公约》还将加强印尼的法律体系、法律机构和法律从业人员。论文类型:研究论文
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书