Professionsidentitet på tværs

Birgitte Lund Nielsen, N. R. Lang, Trine H. Grosen, Hanne Høyer
{"title":"Professionsidentitet på tværs","authors":"Birgitte Lund Nielsen, N. R. Lang, Trine H. Grosen, Hanne Høyer","doi":"10.7146/tfp.v19i36.139976","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the paper differences and similarities comparing professional identity in educations for Nurse, Teacher and Bachelor of Nutrition and Health are discussed. Professional identity formation is conceptualized as a fluid and socially negotiated process. There are international studies about professional identity for nurses and teachers, but a lack of comparative studies. The empirical material are group interviews with students and educators analyzed by reflexive thematic analysis. Both groups are asked about the collective professional identity and experiences with external understandings (based on pictures), and the students also about their (pre)professional identity. The analyses show that all three are professions working with empathy in human relations. There are however different stereotypes related to the external understanding of the professions. The student teachers have experienced to a high degree to have to defense their educational choice and position themselves in opposition to the traditional picture of transmissive teaching. The educators and student nurses challenge the picture of a “nice girl”. They refer to the present political focus and refer to the identity as challenged. Bachelor of Nutrition and Health is a new and somewhat diffuse profession. Acting on evidence but also with respect for the individual is formulated as a core.","PeriodicalId":32373,"journal":{"name":"Tidsskrift for Professionsstudier","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tidsskrift for Professionsstudier","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7146/tfp.v19i36.139976","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the paper differences and similarities comparing professional identity in educations for Nurse, Teacher and Bachelor of Nutrition and Health are discussed. Professional identity formation is conceptualized as a fluid and socially negotiated process. There are international studies about professional identity for nurses and teachers, but a lack of comparative studies. The empirical material are group interviews with students and educators analyzed by reflexive thematic analysis. Both groups are asked about the collective professional identity and experiences with external understandings (based on pictures), and the students also about their (pre)professional identity. The analyses show that all three are professions working with empathy in human relations. There are however different stereotypes related to the external understanding of the professions. The student teachers have experienced to a high degree to have to defense their educational choice and position themselves in opposition to the traditional picture of transmissive teaching. The educators and student nurses challenge the picture of a “nice girl”. They refer to the present political focus and refer to the identity as challenged. Bachelor of Nutrition and Health is a new and somewhat diffuse profession. Acting on evidence but also with respect for the individual is formulated as a core.
跨专业身份
本文讨论了护士、教师和营养与健康学士在教育中职业认同的异同。职业身份形成被概念化为一个流动的、经过社会协商的过程。国际上有关于护士和教师职业认同的研究,但缺乏比较研究。实证材料是对学生和教育工作者的集体访谈,通过反身主题分析进行分析。两组都被问及集体职业身份和外部理解的经历(基于图片),学生们也被问及他们的(前)职业身份。分析表明,这三种职业都是在人际关系中具有同理心的职业。然而,在对专业的外部理解方面存在着不同的陈规定型观念。学生教师在很大程度上经历了不得不为自己的教育选择辩护,并将自己定位在与传统的透射式教学相对立的境地。教育工作者和实习护士对“好女孩”的形象提出了质疑。他们指的是当前的政治焦点,并指的是身份受到挑战。营养与健康学士是一个新的、有点分散的职业。根据证据采取行动,同时尊重个人是一个核心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信