Co-Living, Gentlemen’s Clubs, and Residential Hotels: A Long View of Shared Housing Infrastructures for Single Young Professionals

IF 2.5 3区 经济学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Tegan L. Bergan, A. Gorman‐Murray, Emma R. Power
{"title":"Co-Living, Gentlemen’s Clubs, and Residential Hotels: A Long View of Shared Housing Infrastructures for Single Young Professionals","authors":"Tegan L. Bergan, A. Gorman‐Murray, Emma R. Power","doi":"10.1080/14036096.2023.2248995","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Shared housing is an important infrastructure for young single professionals living and working in the city. Co-living is a contemporary shared housing infrastructure. But it certainly is not the first. We advocate for what Flanagan and Jacobs (2019) call taking a “long view” by drawing connections between early 19th-century gentlemen’s clubs, mid-19th-century residential hotels and contemporary co-living. We argue each have been dynamic infrastructures of mobility, work, and sociality that make certain practices more or less possible and reflect on how the socio-material form of these infrastructures connects with the infrastructural work it does. We draw on our own research study into co-living, connecting our findings with research on the historical housing types. Our findings show that shrinking private spaces, maximizing productive spaces, and integrating services are strategies that animate the infrastructural work of these housing types. By linking co-living with historical housing types, we demonstrate the importance of taking a “long view” when thinking infrastructurally about novel housing practices.","PeriodicalId":47433,"journal":{"name":"Housing Theory & Society","volume":"40 1","pages":"679 - 694"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Housing Theory & Society","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14036096.2023.2248995","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Shared housing is an important infrastructure for young single professionals living and working in the city. Co-living is a contemporary shared housing infrastructure. But it certainly is not the first. We advocate for what Flanagan and Jacobs (2019) call taking a “long view” by drawing connections between early 19th-century gentlemen’s clubs, mid-19th-century residential hotels and contemporary co-living. We argue each have been dynamic infrastructures of mobility, work, and sociality that make certain practices more or less possible and reflect on how the socio-material form of these infrastructures connects with the infrastructural work it does. We draw on our own research study into co-living, connecting our findings with research on the historical housing types. Our findings show that shrinking private spaces, maximizing productive spaces, and integrating services are strategies that animate the infrastructural work of these housing types. By linking co-living with historical housing types, we demonstrate the importance of taking a “long view” when thinking infrastructurally about novel housing practices.
共同生活、绅士俱乐部和住宅酒店:单身年轻专业人士共享住房基础设施的远景
摘要:对于在城市生活和工作的年轻单身专业人士来说,共享住房是一项重要的基础设施。共同居住是一种现代的共享住房基础设施。但这肯定不是第一次。我们提倡弗拉纳根和雅各布斯(2019)所说的“长远眼光”,将19世纪早期的绅士俱乐部、19世纪中期的住宅酒店和当代共同生活联系起来。我们认为,每一个都是流动性、工作和社会性的动态基础设施,使某些实践或多或少成为可能,并反思这些基础设施的社会物质形式如何与它所做的基础设施工作联系在一起。我们借鉴了我们自己对共同居住的研究,将我们的发现与历史住房类型的研究联系起来。我们的研究结果表明,缩小私人空间、最大化生产空间和整合服务是推动这些住房类型基础设施工作的策略。通过将共同居住与历史住房类型联系起来,我们证明了在从基础结构上思考新的住房实践时,从“长远来看”的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
6.50%
发文量
28
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信