Non-cardiac depolarization-blocking drugs are associated with increased risk of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in the community

T. E. Eroglu, M. Blom, P. Souverein, A. Boer, H. Tan
{"title":"Non-cardiac depolarization-blocking drugs are associated with increased risk of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in the community","authors":"T. E. Eroglu, M. Blom, P. Souverein, A. Boer, H. Tan","doi":"10.22541/au.163281221.16214220/v1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim Depolarization-blocking drugs (DB-drugs) used for cardiac disease\nincrease the risk of cardiac arrhythmia (ventricular\ntachycardia/ventricular fibrillation[VT/VF]) and out-of-hospital\ncardiac arrest (OHCA) in specific patient groups. However, it is unknown\nwhether drugs for non-cardiac disease that block cardiac depolarization\nas off-target effect increase the risk of OHCA on a population level.\nTherefore, we aimed to investigate OHCA-risk of non-cardiac DB-drugs in\nthe community. Methods We conducted a population-based case-control\nstudy. We included OHCA-cases from an Emergency Medical Services\nattended OHCA-registry in the Netherlands (ARREST:2009-2018), and\nage/sex/OHCA-date matched non-OHCA-controls. We calculated adjusted odds\nratios (ORadj) of use of non-cardiac DB-drugs for OHCA, using\nconditional logistic regression. Stratified analyses were performed\naccording to first-registered rhythm (VT/VF or non-VT/VF), sex and age\n(≤50, 50-70, or ≥70 years). Results We included 5,473 OHCA-cases of whom\n427 (7.8%) used non-cardiac DB-drugs, and 21,866 non-OHCA-controls of\nwhom 835 (3.8%) used non-cardiac DB-drugs, and found that non-cardiac\nDB-drug use was associated with increased OHCA-risk when compared to\nno-use (ORadj1.6[95%-CI:1.4-1.9]). Stratification by first-recorded\nrhythm revealed that this applied to OHCA with non-VT/VF (asystole)\n(ORadj2.5[95%-CI:2.1-3.0]), but not with VT/VF\n(ORadj1.0[95%-CI:0.8-1.2];P-value interaction<0.001). The\nrisk was higher in women (ORadj 1.8[95%-CI:1.5-2.2] than in men\n(ORadj1.5[95%-CI:1.2-1.8];P-value interaction=0.030) and at younger\nage\n(ORadj≥70yrs1.4[95%-CI:1.2-1.7];ORadj50-70yrs1.7[95%-CI:1.4-2.1];ORadj≤50yrs3.2[95%-CI:2.1-5.0];P-value\ninteraction<0.001). Conclusions Use of non-cardiac DB-drugs is\nassociated with increased OHCA-risk in the general population. This\nincreased risk occurred in patients in whom non-VT/VF was the\nfirst-registered rhythm, and it occurred in both sexes, but more\nprominently among women, and more strongly in younger patients (≤50\nyears).","PeriodicalId":74431,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacoepidemiology","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacoepidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22541/au.163281221.16214220/v1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Aim Depolarization-blocking drugs (DB-drugs) used for cardiac disease increase the risk of cardiac arrhythmia (ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation[VT/VF]) and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) in specific patient groups. However, it is unknown whether drugs for non-cardiac disease that block cardiac depolarization as off-target effect increase the risk of OHCA on a population level. Therefore, we aimed to investigate OHCA-risk of non-cardiac DB-drugs in the community. Methods We conducted a population-based case-control study. We included OHCA-cases from an Emergency Medical Services attended OHCA-registry in the Netherlands (ARREST:2009-2018), and age/sex/OHCA-date matched non-OHCA-controls. We calculated adjusted odds ratios (ORadj) of use of non-cardiac DB-drugs for OHCA, using conditional logistic regression. Stratified analyses were performed according to first-registered rhythm (VT/VF or non-VT/VF), sex and age (≤50, 50-70, or ≥70 years). Results We included 5,473 OHCA-cases of whom 427 (7.8%) used non-cardiac DB-drugs, and 21,866 non-OHCA-controls of whom 835 (3.8%) used non-cardiac DB-drugs, and found that non-cardiac DB-drug use was associated with increased OHCA-risk when compared to no-use (ORadj1.6[95%-CI:1.4-1.9]). Stratification by first-recorded rhythm revealed that this applied to OHCA with non-VT/VF (asystole) (ORadj2.5[95%-CI:2.1-3.0]), but not with VT/VF (ORadj1.0[95%-CI:0.8-1.2];P-value interaction<0.001). The risk was higher in women (ORadj 1.8[95%-CI:1.5-2.2] than in men (ORadj1.5[95%-CI:1.2-1.8];P-value interaction=0.030) and at younger age (ORadj≥70yrs1.4[95%-CI:1.2-1.7];ORadj50-70yrs1.7[95%-CI:1.4-2.1];ORadj≤50yrs3.2[95%-CI:2.1-5.0];P-value interaction<0.001). Conclusions Use of non-cardiac DB-drugs is associated with increased OHCA-risk in the general population. This increased risk occurred in patients in whom non-VT/VF was the first-registered rhythm, and it occurred in both sexes, but more prominently among women, and more strongly in younger patients (≤50 years).
非心脏去极化阻断药物与社区院外心脏骤停风险增加有关
目的:去极化阻断药物(DB-drugs)可增加特定患者群体发生心律失常(室性心动过速/心室颤动[VT/VF])和院外心脏骤停(OHCA)的风险。然而,在人群水平上,阻断心脏去极化脱靶效应的非心脏疾病药物是否会增加OHCA的风险尚不清楚。因此,我们的目的是调查社区中非心脏类药物的ohca风险。方法我们进行了一项基于人群的病例对照研究。我们纳入了来自荷兰紧急医疗服务中心参加的ohca登记处的ohca病例(ARREST:2009-2018),年龄/性别/ ohca日期与非ohca对照相匹配。我们使用条件logistic回归计算了OHCA患者使用非心脏类药物的调整奇比(ORadj)。根据首次登记的心律(VT/VF或非VT/VF)、性别和年龄(≤50岁、50-70岁或≥70岁)进行分层分析。我们纳入了5,473例ohca病例,其中427例(7.8%)使用非心脏用药,21,866例非ohca对照,其中835例(3.8%)使用非心脏用药,发现与不使用相比,非心脏用药与ohca风险增加相关(ORadj1.6[95%-CI:1.4-1.9])。首次记录的心律分层显示,这适用于非VT/VF(停止)的OHCA (ORadj2.5[95%-CI:2.1-3.0]),但不适用于VT/VF(ORadj1.0[95%-CI:0.8-1.2]; p值相互作用<0.001)。女性的风险(ORadj 1.8[95%-CI:1.5-2.2])高于男性(ORadj1.5[95%-CI:1.2-1.8]; p值相互作用=0.030)和年轻时(ORadj≥70yrs1.4[95%-CI:1.2-1.7];ORadj50-70yrs1.7[95%-CI:1.4-2.1];ORadj≤50yrs3.2[95%-CI:2.1-5.0]; p值相互作用<0.001)。结论:在普通人群中,非心脏类药物的使用与ohca风险增加相关。这种风险增加发生在首次登记节律为非室速/室速的患者中,并且发生在两性中,但在女性中更为突出,在年轻患者(≤50岁)中更为强烈。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信