Are the Economic Consequences of Climate Change Really “Pro-Poor”?

Gang Jin, Kunrong Shen, Yuting Sun
{"title":"Are the Economic Consequences of Climate Change Really “Pro-Poor”?","authors":"Gang Jin, Kunrong Shen, Yuting Sun","doi":"10.1515/cfer-2021-0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In order to comprehensively study the influence of climate change on economic growth and energy conservation & emission reduction, this paper first uses the non-radial directional distance function (NDDF) to calculate the city-level green economic efficiency in China during 2003-2016. The causal effect of daily temperature changes on green economic efficiency is then identified to evaluate the economic consequences of climate change. It finds that relative to the 6~12℃ temperature benchmark, any decrease or increase in temperature will pose negative influence on green economic efficiency; moreover, such effects are only observed in developed cities, but not significant in less-developed ones. This reflects that the economic consequences of climate change are “robbing the rich” to some extents, which differs widely from the “pro-poor” conclusion in the majority of literature previously. Subject to the robustness test and with possible competitive explanations excluded, this finding still stands. The mechanism test reveals that temperature rise brings about economic consequences that “rob the rich” by affecting labor productivity, efficiency of energy conservation & emission reduction and execution of environmental regulations by local government. This study brings a different perspective for understanding the economic consequences of climate change and offers empirical basis for identifying responsibilities of local government in climate governance.","PeriodicalId":66259,"journal":{"name":"China Finance and Economic Review","volume":"10 1","pages":"3 - 21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"China Finance and Economic Review","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/cfer-2021-0008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Abstract In order to comprehensively study the influence of climate change on economic growth and energy conservation & emission reduction, this paper first uses the non-radial directional distance function (NDDF) to calculate the city-level green economic efficiency in China during 2003-2016. The causal effect of daily temperature changes on green economic efficiency is then identified to evaluate the economic consequences of climate change. It finds that relative to the 6~12℃ temperature benchmark, any decrease or increase in temperature will pose negative influence on green economic efficiency; moreover, such effects are only observed in developed cities, but not significant in less-developed ones. This reflects that the economic consequences of climate change are “robbing the rich” to some extents, which differs widely from the “pro-poor” conclusion in the majority of literature previously. Subject to the robustness test and with possible competitive explanations excluded, this finding still stands. The mechanism test reveals that temperature rise brings about economic consequences that “rob the rich” by affecting labor productivity, efficiency of energy conservation & emission reduction and execution of environmental regulations by local government. This study brings a different perspective for understanding the economic consequences of climate change and offers empirical basis for identifying responsibilities of local government in climate governance.
气候变化的经济后果真的“有利于穷人”吗?
摘要为了全面研究气候变化对经济增长和节能减排的影响,本文首次使用非径向方向距离函数(NDDF)计算了2003-2016年中国城市级绿色经济效率。然后确定每日温度变化对绿色经济效率的因果影响,以评估气候变化的经济后果。研究发现,相对于6~12℃的温度基准,温度的任何降低或升高都会对绿色经济效率产生负面影响;此外,这种影响仅在发达城市中观察到,而在欠发达城市中并不显著。这反映出气候变化的经济后果在某种程度上是“掠夺富人”,这与之前大多数文献中的“有利于穷人”的结论大相径庭。经过稳健性检验,排除可能的竞争性解释,这一发现仍然有效。机制检验表明,气温升高会影响劳动生产率、节能减排效率和地方政府执行环境法规,从而带来“抢富”的经济后果。这项研究为理解气候变化的经济后果带来了不同的视角,并为确定地方政府在气候治理中的责任提供了经验依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
88
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信