Radiation-Induced Toxicity Risks in Photon Versus Proton Therapy for Synchronous Bilateral Breast Cancer

IF 2.1 Q3 ONCOLOGY
L. Stick, M. F. Jensen, S. Bentzen, C. Kamby, A. Y. Lundgaard, M. Maraldo, B. Offersen, Jen Yu, I. Vogelius
{"title":"Radiation-Induced Toxicity Risks in Photon Versus Proton Therapy for Synchronous Bilateral Breast Cancer","authors":"L. Stick, M. F. Jensen, S. Bentzen, C. Kamby, A. Y. Lundgaard, M. Maraldo, B. Offersen, Jen Yu, I. Vogelius","doi":"10.14338/IJPT-21-00023.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose This study compares photon and proton therapy plans for patients with synchronous bilateral early breast cancer and estimates risks of early and late radiation-induced toxicities. Materials and Methods Twenty-four patients with synchronous bilateral early breast cancer receiving adjuvant radiation therapy using photons, 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy or volumetric modulated arc therapy, were included and competing pencil beam scanning proton therapy plans were created. Risks of dermatitis, pneumonitis, acute esophageal toxicity, lung and breast fibrosis, hypothyroidism, secondary lung and esophageal cancer and coronary artery events were estimated using published dose-response relationships and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) models. Results The primary clinical target volume V95% and/or nodal clinical target volume V90% were less than 95% in 17 photon therapy plans and none of the proton plans. Median NTCP of radiation dermatitis ≥ grade 2 was 18.3% (range, 5.4-41.7) with photon therapy and 58.4% (range, 31.4-69.7) with proton therapy. Median excess absolute risk (EAR) of secondary lung cancer at age 80 for current and former smokers was 4.8% (range, 0.0-17.0) using photons and 2.7% (range, 0.0-13.6) using protons. Median EAR of coronary event at age 80, assuming all patients have preexisting cardiac risk factors, was 1.0% (range, 0.0-5.6) with photons and 0.2% (range, 0.0-1.3) with protons. Conclusion Proton therapy plans improved target coverage and reduced risk of coronary artery event and secondary lung cancer while increasing the risk of radiation dermatitis.","PeriodicalId":36923,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Particle Therapy","volume":"8 1","pages":"1 - 13"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Particle Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14338/IJPT-21-00023.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose This study compares photon and proton therapy plans for patients with synchronous bilateral early breast cancer and estimates risks of early and late radiation-induced toxicities. Materials and Methods Twenty-four patients with synchronous bilateral early breast cancer receiving adjuvant radiation therapy using photons, 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy or volumetric modulated arc therapy, were included and competing pencil beam scanning proton therapy plans were created. Risks of dermatitis, pneumonitis, acute esophageal toxicity, lung and breast fibrosis, hypothyroidism, secondary lung and esophageal cancer and coronary artery events were estimated using published dose-response relationships and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) models. Results The primary clinical target volume V95% and/or nodal clinical target volume V90% were less than 95% in 17 photon therapy plans and none of the proton plans. Median NTCP of radiation dermatitis ≥ grade 2 was 18.3% (range, 5.4-41.7) with photon therapy and 58.4% (range, 31.4-69.7) with proton therapy. Median excess absolute risk (EAR) of secondary lung cancer at age 80 for current and former smokers was 4.8% (range, 0.0-17.0) using photons and 2.7% (range, 0.0-13.6) using protons. Median EAR of coronary event at age 80, assuming all patients have preexisting cardiac risk factors, was 1.0% (range, 0.0-5.6) with photons and 0.2% (range, 0.0-1.3) with protons. Conclusion Proton therapy plans improved target coverage and reduced risk of coronary artery event and secondary lung cancer while increasing the risk of radiation dermatitis.
光子与质子治疗同步双侧乳腺癌的辐射诱导毒性风险
目的本研究比较了双侧同步早期癌症患者的光子和质子治疗计划,并估计了早期和晚期放射性毒性的风险。材料与方法纳入20例同步双侧早期癌症患者,采用光子辅助放射治疗、三维适形放射治疗或体积调制电弧治疗,并制定竞争性笔束扫描质子治疗计划。使用已发表的剂量反应关系和正常组织并发症概率(NTCP)模型估计皮炎、肺炎、急性食管毒性、肺和乳腺纤维化、甲状腺功能减退、继发性肺和食管癌症以及冠状动脉事件的风险。结果17个光子治疗方案的主要临床靶体积V95%和/或淋巴结临床靶体积V 90%均小于95%,质子治疗方案均未达到。放射性皮炎≥2级的中位NTCP在光子治疗中为18.3%(范围5.4-41.7),在质子治疗中为58.4%(范围31.4-69.7)。目前和曾经吸烟的人在80岁时患继发性癌症的中位超额绝对风险(EAR)为4.8%(范围0.0-17.0)(使用光子)和2.7%(范围0.0-13.6)(使用质子)。假设所有患者都有预先存在的心脏风险因素,80岁时冠状动脉事件的中位EAR,光子为1.0%(范围0.0-5.6),质子为0.2%(范围0.0-1.3)。结论质子治疗方案提高了靶点覆盖率,降低了冠状动脉事件和继发性癌症的风险,同时增加了放射性皮炎的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Particle Therapy
International Journal of Particle Therapy Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.90%
发文量
23
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信