Cómo evaluar una simulación de la metodología por proyectos a través del uso de rúbricas en el Grado de Educación Primaria

IF 1.4 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Paloma Rodríguez Miñambres, A. Martínez, A. Robles, Ana Isabel Ugalde Gorostiza
{"title":"Cómo evaluar una simulación de la metodología por proyectos a través del uso de rúbricas en el Grado de Educación Primaria","authors":"Paloma Rodríguez Miñambres, A. Martínez, A. Robles, Ana Isabel Ugalde Gorostiza","doi":"10.6018/REIFOP.21.2.315011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The development of transversal skills in higher education requires new methodological approaches that overcome traditional barriers between disciplines. This challenge has been approached by the design and implementation of Interdisciplinary Modular Projects (IMP). This paper presents the evaluation instruments for an interdisciplinary teaching proposal that was implemented in a Primary Teacher Training Degree. To inform about the progress of students’ collaborative work, their final written report and the oral presentation, four rubrics were designed. In order to know the impact this methodology has on the development of the professional skills of teachers-to-be, a questionnaire was designed to collect their opinions. In addition, the evaluation of this methodology is presented, which was carried out during the second year of implementation, and took into account both students’ and lecturers’ opinion. The results highlight the importance of coordination between scholars and of an effective students’ guidance during the process, so they receive specific tutorials for the simulation, to link theory and practice and are given tools that help them prepare their IMP.","PeriodicalId":36972,"journal":{"name":"Revista Electronica Interuniversitaria de Formacion del Profesorado","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.6018/REIFOP.21.2.315011","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Electronica Interuniversitaria de Formacion del Profesorado","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6018/REIFOP.21.2.315011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The development of transversal skills in higher education requires new methodological approaches that overcome traditional barriers between disciplines. This challenge has been approached by the design and implementation of Interdisciplinary Modular Projects (IMP). This paper presents the evaluation instruments for an interdisciplinary teaching proposal that was implemented in a Primary Teacher Training Degree. To inform about the progress of students’ collaborative work, their final written report and the oral presentation, four rubrics were designed. In order to know the impact this methodology has on the development of the professional skills of teachers-to-be, a questionnaire was designed to collect their opinions. In addition, the evaluation of this methodology is presented, which was carried out during the second year of implementation, and took into account both students’ and lecturers’ opinion. The results highlight the importance of coordination between scholars and of an effective students’ guidance during the process, so they receive specific tutorials for the simulation, to link theory and practice and are given tools that help them prepare their IMP.
如何在小学阶段通过使用标题来评估项目方法的模拟
高等教育中横向技能的发展需要新的方法论方法来克服学科之间的传统障碍。跨学科模块化项目(IMP)的设计和实施应对了这一挑战。本文介绍了在小学教师培训学位中实施的跨学科教学建议的评估工具。为了了解学生合作工作的进展,他们的最终书面报告和口头陈述,设计了四个量规。为了了解这种方法对未来教师专业技能发展的影响,设计了一份问卷来收集他们的意见。此外,还介绍了在实施的第二年对这一方法进行的评估,该评估考虑了学生和讲师的意见。研究结果强调了学者之间的协调和学生在此过程中有效指导的重要性,因此他们获得了模拟的具体教程,将理论和实践联系起来,并获得了帮助他们准备IMP的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
37
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信