Criminal Justice Diversion and the Importance of Program Retention

Burcu Ozturk, Andrew M. Bell, D. McLeod, R. Gentzler
{"title":"Criminal Justice Diversion and the Importance of Program Retention","authors":"Burcu Ozturk, Andrew M. Bell, D. McLeod, R. Gentzler","doi":"10.15763/issn.1936-9298.2022.6.1.43-56","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The United States has among the highest recidivism rates globally, with at least 1 in 4 rearrested within the same year of their initial charge. Many of these individuals are significantly impacted by poverty, mental illness, and substance use disorders. Recidivism reduction has become a significant focus of criminal justice reform and is gaining attention nationwide. Current scholarly literature suggests evidence-based reentry policies and programs can improve individual-level outcomes. This paper introduces the concept of diversion programming and measures how one diversion program impacted recidivism rates in a mid-sized metropolitan area of the US. Researchers examined one year's worth of data from 757 individuals released from the local county jail (January 2021 - December 2021) and calculated the average one-year recidivism rate comparing that of program participants to those of the larger community. Findings revealed that only 3.70% of those who completed this specific diversion program were rearrested within a year after their completion date. In comparison, members of the local community, who were not part of the program, were rearrested at a rate of 28.4%. Moreover, when clients were not retained in the program, recidivism rates were significantly higher at 31.22%. The authors suggest justice navigation-based diversion programs can effectively reduce recidivism if, and when, those programs ensure retention. This study can be a resource for future researchers, stakeholders, policymakers, and practitioners to support diversionary programming to reduce recidivism.","PeriodicalId":89974,"journal":{"name":"Journal of forensic social work","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of forensic social work","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15763/issn.1936-9298.2022.6.1.43-56","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The United States has among the highest recidivism rates globally, with at least 1 in 4 rearrested within the same year of their initial charge. Many of these individuals are significantly impacted by poverty, mental illness, and substance use disorders. Recidivism reduction has become a significant focus of criminal justice reform and is gaining attention nationwide. Current scholarly literature suggests evidence-based reentry policies and programs can improve individual-level outcomes. This paper introduces the concept of diversion programming and measures how one diversion program impacted recidivism rates in a mid-sized metropolitan area of the US. Researchers examined one year's worth of data from 757 individuals released from the local county jail (January 2021 - December 2021) and calculated the average one-year recidivism rate comparing that of program participants to those of the larger community. Findings revealed that only 3.70% of those who completed this specific diversion program were rearrested within a year after their completion date. In comparison, members of the local community, who were not part of the program, were rearrested at a rate of 28.4%. Moreover, when clients were not retained in the program, recidivism rates were significantly higher at 31.22%. The authors suggest justice navigation-based diversion programs can effectively reduce recidivism if, and when, those programs ensure retention. This study can be a resource for future researchers, stakeholders, policymakers, and practitioners to support diversionary programming to reduce recidivism.
刑事司法分流与程序保留的重要性
美国是全球累犯率最高的国家之一,至少四分之一的人在最初被指控的同一年内被重新逮捕。其中许多人受到贫困、精神疾病和药物使用障碍的严重影响。减少累犯已成为刑事司法改革的一个重要重点,并在全国范围内受到关注。目前的学术文献表明,基于证据的重返社会政策和计划可以改善个人层面的结果。本文介绍了分流计划的概念,并衡量了一个分流计划如何影响美国中等规模大都市地区的累犯率。研究人员检查了757名从当地县监狱获释的人(2021年1月至2021年12月)一年的数据,并将项目参与者与更大社区的参与者进行了比较,计算出了一年的平均累犯率。调查结果显示,在完成这一特定分流计划的人中,只有3.70%在完成日期后一年内被重新逮捕。相比之下,未参与该项目的当地社区成员被重新逮捕的比率为28.4%。此外,当客户未被保留在该项目中时,累犯率明显更高,为31.22%。作者建议,如果这些项目确保保留,基于司法导航的分流项目可以有效减少累犯。这项研究可以为未来的研究人员、利益相关者、政策制定者和从业者提供资源,以支持转移注意力的计划,减少累犯。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信