The Subject Is Still There. Judicial Statements and Mexican Political-Military Organizations in the Seventies

IF 0.3 4区 社会学 Q4 CULTURAL STUDIES
Aleida García Aguirre
{"title":"The Subject Is Still There. Judicial Statements and Mexican Political-Military Organizations in the Seventies","authors":"Aleida García Aguirre","doi":"10.1080/13569325.2021.1971957","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article analyses the judicial statements of members of political-military organizations that were obtained by agents of the national security and intelligence institution Dirección Federal de Seguridad (Federal Security Department; DFS) during the seventies. The analysis proposes that the conditions in which these documents were produced, as well as their dialogic and uneven nature, brought about narratives of the lives of the detainees that may be used as an index to understand certain aspects of these militants’ process of subjectivation. For example, the heterogeneity of their social origins and the diverse spaces about which they spoke, as a way to account for their political trajectory prior to their participation in armed militancy, and how they conceptualised both the organisation and their militancy. At the same time, it is also possible to find certain traces about the DFS agents who interrogated them: their bias against the militants, the aspects and features of the lives of the detainees that were inaudible to them. The corpus of DFS statements, as a discourse, provides a useful resource for problematising our conception of who the militants and agents of repression were, and for broadening the history of Mexico’s recent past.","PeriodicalId":56341,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Latin American Cultural Studies","volume":"30 1","pages":"349 - 370"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Latin American Cultural Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13569325.2021.1971957","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CULTURAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article analyses the judicial statements of members of political-military organizations that were obtained by agents of the national security and intelligence institution Dirección Federal de Seguridad (Federal Security Department; DFS) during the seventies. The analysis proposes that the conditions in which these documents were produced, as well as their dialogic and uneven nature, brought about narratives of the lives of the detainees that may be used as an index to understand certain aspects of these militants’ process of subjectivation. For example, the heterogeneity of their social origins and the diverse spaces about which they spoke, as a way to account for their political trajectory prior to their participation in armed militancy, and how they conceptualised both the organisation and their militancy. At the same time, it is also possible to find certain traces about the DFS agents who interrogated them: their bias against the militants, the aspects and features of the lives of the detainees that were inaudible to them. The corpus of DFS statements, as a discourse, provides a useful resource for problematising our conception of who the militants and agents of repression were, and for broadening the history of Mexico’s recent past.
主题还在。70年代的司法声明与墨西哥政治军事组织
本文分析了国家安全和情报机构Dirección Federal de Seguridad(联邦安全部;DFS)的特工在70年代获得的政治军事组织成员的司法陈述。分析表明,这些文件的制作条件,以及它们的对话性和不均衡性,导致了对被拘留者生活的叙述,可以作为理解这些武装分子主观化过程某些方面的指标。例如,他们社会出身的异质性和他们所谈论的不同空间,以此来解释他们在参与武装战斗之前的政治轨迹,以及他们如何将组织和战斗概念化。与此同时,还可以找到审问他们的外勤部特工的某些痕迹:他们对武装分子的偏见,被拘留者生活中听不见的方面和特征。DFS的声明集作为一种话语,为我们对武装分子和镇压人员的概念提出质疑,并拓宽墨西哥近代历史提供了有用的资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信