Building back better in Latin America: examining the sustainability of COVID-19 recovery and development programs

IF 4.6 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
R. O'Ryan, A. Villavicencio, Joaquín Gajardo, A. Ulloa, Cecilia Ibarra, M. Rojas
{"title":"Building back better in Latin America: examining the sustainability of COVID-19 recovery and development programs","authors":"R. O'Ryan, A. Villavicencio, Joaquín Gajardo, A. Ulloa, Cecilia Ibarra, M. Rojas","doi":"10.1017/sus.2023.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Non-technical summary The significant outlays by countries in the Global South to recover from the COVID-19 crisis could have been an opportunity to build back better, advancing both a green recovery and addressing pressing social problems, thus advancing sustainability. To examine if this was the case, in this paper we analyze the expected impacts of recovery initiatives in five Latin American countries. Our results show that these programs do not support the possibility of building back better, weakly impacting 12 dimensions related to sustainability. We also propose a methodology to improve how sustainability concerns can be included in future choice of projects. Technical summary It has been argued that the significant outlays by governments across the world required to recover from the COVID-19 crisis can be an opportunity to build back better, that is, advance toward greener societies. In the Global South, which suffered acute social, economic and environmental problems prior to this health crisis, recovery initiatives would be best suited to focus on sustainable economic recovery which – along with the environmental concerns of a green recovery – could address pressing local problems. To this end, we analyzed the expected impacts of recovery initiatives in five Latin American countries on each of 71 sustainability criteria. These criteria are based on the UN sustainable development goals and other relevant literature related to sustainable development. Using principal component analysis, criteria are grouped into 12 dimensions. Our results show that recovery programs examined do not take advantage of the possibility of building back better, and many relevant dimensions related to a sustainable recovery are only weakly considered. Our methodology provides a step forward toward supporting governments in their efforts to identify better policies and investment projects and consequently put together packages of initiatives that advance on sustainability, green recovery or other long-term goals they may have. Social media summary Methodology to analyze COVID-19 recovery packages shows small impact on sustainability in five Latin American countries.","PeriodicalId":36849,"journal":{"name":"Global Sustainability","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/sus.2023.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Non-technical summary The significant outlays by countries in the Global South to recover from the COVID-19 crisis could have been an opportunity to build back better, advancing both a green recovery and addressing pressing social problems, thus advancing sustainability. To examine if this was the case, in this paper we analyze the expected impacts of recovery initiatives in five Latin American countries. Our results show that these programs do not support the possibility of building back better, weakly impacting 12 dimensions related to sustainability. We also propose a methodology to improve how sustainability concerns can be included in future choice of projects. Technical summary It has been argued that the significant outlays by governments across the world required to recover from the COVID-19 crisis can be an opportunity to build back better, that is, advance toward greener societies. In the Global South, which suffered acute social, economic and environmental problems prior to this health crisis, recovery initiatives would be best suited to focus on sustainable economic recovery which – along with the environmental concerns of a green recovery – could address pressing local problems. To this end, we analyzed the expected impacts of recovery initiatives in five Latin American countries on each of 71 sustainability criteria. These criteria are based on the UN sustainable development goals and other relevant literature related to sustainable development. Using principal component analysis, criteria are grouped into 12 dimensions. Our results show that recovery programs examined do not take advantage of the possibility of building back better, and many relevant dimensions related to a sustainable recovery are only weakly considered. Our methodology provides a step forward toward supporting governments in their efforts to identify better policies and investment projects and consequently put together packages of initiatives that advance on sustainability, green recovery or other long-term goals they may have. Social media summary Methodology to analyze COVID-19 recovery packages shows small impact on sustainability in five Latin American countries.
在拉丁美洲重建得更好:审查新冠肺炎复苏和发展计划的可持续性
非技术性总结全球南方国家从新冠肺炎危机中恢复的大量支出本可以成为一个更好地重建的机会,推动绿色复苏和解决紧迫的社会问题,从而促进可持续性。为了检验情况是否如此,本文分析了五个拉丁美洲国家复苏举措的预期影响。我们的研究结果表明,这些计划不支持重建得更好的可能性,对与可持续性相关的12个维度的影响较小。我们还提出了一种方法,以改进如何将可持续性问题纳入未来项目选择中。技术摘要有人认为,世界各国政府从新冠肺炎危机中恢复所需的大量支出可能是一个重建得更好的机会,也就是说,向更环保的社会迈进。在全球南方,在这场健康危机之前,该地区遭受了严重的社会、经济和环境问题,复苏举措最适合专注于可持续的经济复苏,这与绿色复苏的环境问题一起,可以解决紧迫的地方问题。为此,我们分析了五个拉丁美洲国家的复苏举措对71项可持续性标准的预期影响。这些标准以联合国可持续发展目标和其他与可持续发展有关的文献为基础。使用主成分分析,将标准分为12个维度。我们的研究结果表明,所审查的复苏计划没有利用重建得更好的可能性,而且与可持续复苏相关的许多相关方面只得到了微弱的考虑。我们的方法向前迈出了一步,支持各国政府努力确定更好的政策和投资项目,从而制定一揽子举措,推进可持续性、绿色复苏或其他长期目标。社交媒体摘要分析新冠肺炎复苏方案的方法显示,对五个拉丁美洲国家的可持续性影响很小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Sustainability
Global Sustainability Environmental Science-Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
3.60%
发文量
19
审稿时长
17 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信