Toward a non-binary semiotics of intersectionality: linguistic anthropology in the wake of coloniality

IF 1.8 2区 文学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY
Jay Ke-Schutte, Joshua Babcock
{"title":"Toward a non-binary semiotics of intersectionality: linguistic anthropology in the wake of coloniality","authors":"Jay Ke-Schutte,&nbsp;Joshua Babcock","doi":"10.1111/jola.12397","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This special issue proposes a non-binary semiotics of intersectionality to both draw attention to and unsettle binary participation frameworks of “the-West-and-its-others.” Contributors demonstrate how intersectionality can reconfigure scholarly approaches to the semiotic analysis of social life, expanding the bounds of the ethnographic as both genre and site of ideological work while also suggesting new stakes for conceptualizations of the personal beyond static, neoliberal presuppositions of the identity-bearing individual. This proposed reorientation has stakes for the study of race–language co-naturalizations in locations reflexively cast as beyond white settler-colonial contexts. We place the study of intersectionality within the historical socius of the colonial and its prefixes (de-, post-, and anti-) by engaging with the historical and material conditions of human capital and land enclosure out of which Kimberlé Crenshaw’s micro-interactional observations emerged as originary reflections on the concept of intersectionality. Together, we consider linguistic and co(n)textual phenomena that are left out of most contemporary intersectional and critical race analyses. The authors demonstrate an array of modalities through which we can analytically separate intersectionality-as-method, while not assuming American monolingual racial experiences as universal.</p>","PeriodicalId":47070,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Linguistic Anthropology","volume":"33 2","pages":"112-130"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jola.12397","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Linguistic Anthropology","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jola.12397","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This special issue proposes a non-binary semiotics of intersectionality to both draw attention to and unsettle binary participation frameworks of “the-West-and-its-others.” Contributors demonstrate how intersectionality can reconfigure scholarly approaches to the semiotic analysis of social life, expanding the bounds of the ethnographic as both genre and site of ideological work while also suggesting new stakes for conceptualizations of the personal beyond static, neoliberal presuppositions of the identity-bearing individual. This proposed reorientation has stakes for the study of race–language co-naturalizations in locations reflexively cast as beyond white settler-colonial contexts. We place the study of intersectionality within the historical socius of the colonial and its prefixes (de-, post-, and anti-) by engaging with the historical and material conditions of human capital and land enclosure out of which Kimberlé Crenshaw’s micro-interactional observations emerged as originary reflections on the concept of intersectionality. Together, we consider linguistic and co(n)textual phenomena that are left out of most contemporary intersectional and critical race analyses. The authors demonstrate an array of modalities through which we can analytically separate intersectionality-as-method, while not assuming American monolingual racial experiences as universal.

走向交叉性的非二元符号学:殖民时代的语言人类学
本特刊提出了一种交叉性的非二元符号学,以引起人们对“西方及其他人”的二元参与框架的关注并使其不安。贡献者展示了交叉性如何重新配置社会生活符号分析的学术方法,扩大了民族志作为意识形态工作的流派和场所的界限,同时也为个人概念化提出了新的利害关系,超越了带有身份的个人的静态、新自由主义预设。这一拟议的重新定位对研究种族-语言在白人定居者-殖民地背景之外的共同归化有利害关系。我们通过研究人力资本和土地圈地的历史和物质条件,将交叉性研究置于殖民地及其前缀(de‐、post‐和anti‐)的历史社会中,KimberléCrenshaw的微观互动观察是对交叉性概念的原始反思。我们一起考虑大多数当代交叉和批判性种族分析中遗漏的语言和共(n)文本现象。作者展示了一系列模式,通过这些模式,我们可以分析分离交叉性作为方法,同时不假设美国单语种族经历是普遍的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
25.00%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: The Journal of Linguistic Anthropology explores the many ways in which language shapes social life. Published with the journal"s pages are articles on the anthropological study of language, including analysis of discourse, language in society, language and cognition, and language acquisition of socialization. The Journal of Linguistic Anthropology is published semiannually.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信