Culture from the Slums: Punk Rock in East and West Germany by Jeff Hayton (review)

IF 0.2 4区 社会学 Q4 AREA STUDIES
Joe Perry
{"title":"Culture from the Slums: Punk Rock in East and West Germany by Jeff Hayton (review)","authors":"Joe Perry","doi":"10.1353/gsr.2023.0028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"tion of East German society by the SED. Eedy amends this model by adopting the concept of an “ersatz public sphere” where the critical public opinion that Jürgen Habermas associates with the public sphere finds alternative forms of expression within the privacy of the domestic space, and where Eigensinn—a mechanism that allowed East German citizens to normalize their domestic space by conceiving of it as outside of the reach of state-controlled media—plays an important role. With Mary Fulbrook, Eedy attributes to the GDR, as a niche society, a stabilizing effect for the SED regime, which for this reason unofficially allowed for criticism articulated in a permissible way (e.g., through civic petitions) from within the private sphere. Diffusion and consumption of children’s comic books fall under this category—and Eedy aptly documents East German comic books as sites of contested power where the regime’s efforts at complete oversight were countered by the comics’ creators (for instance, in the haphazard, anti-teleological time-travel of Mosaik’s comic book characters, the Digedags) or the children themselves (by using comic books to articulate their experiences of childhood under GDR socialism). By analyzing letters written to the FDJ, the third chapter, “Power, Eigensinn, and the Construction of Space through Comics,” examines further the interplay between the state and the comic book readership as a site of potential freedom, onto which the latter projected its interests and critical reflections. This point is further explored by Eedy in the evocative fourth chapter (“Escape, Escapism, and the Cultural Imperialism of Comic Book Travel in Mosaik and Atze”), which explores the comics’ capacious and problematic representation of travel as incompatible with both their supposedly anti-imperialist ethos and with the possibilities afforded to children by European communist societies, the latter of which resulted in the creation of “unrealistic expectations” among their young readership. Anna Horakova, University of Grenoble","PeriodicalId":43954,"journal":{"name":"German Studies Review","volume":"46 1","pages":"176 - 178"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"German Studies Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/gsr.2023.0028","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

tion of East German society by the SED. Eedy amends this model by adopting the concept of an “ersatz public sphere” where the critical public opinion that Jürgen Habermas associates with the public sphere finds alternative forms of expression within the privacy of the domestic space, and where Eigensinn—a mechanism that allowed East German citizens to normalize their domestic space by conceiving of it as outside of the reach of state-controlled media—plays an important role. With Mary Fulbrook, Eedy attributes to the GDR, as a niche society, a stabilizing effect for the SED regime, which for this reason unofficially allowed for criticism articulated in a permissible way (e.g., through civic petitions) from within the private sphere. Diffusion and consumption of children’s comic books fall under this category—and Eedy aptly documents East German comic books as sites of contested power where the regime’s efforts at complete oversight were countered by the comics’ creators (for instance, in the haphazard, anti-teleological time-travel of Mosaik’s comic book characters, the Digedags) or the children themselves (by using comic books to articulate their experiences of childhood under GDR socialism). By analyzing letters written to the FDJ, the third chapter, “Power, Eigensinn, and the Construction of Space through Comics,” examines further the interplay between the state and the comic book readership as a site of potential freedom, onto which the latter projected its interests and critical reflections. This point is further explored by Eedy in the evocative fourth chapter (“Escape, Escapism, and the Cultural Imperialism of Comic Book Travel in Mosaik and Atze”), which explores the comics’ capacious and problematic representation of travel as incompatible with both their supposedly anti-imperialist ethos and with the possibilities afforded to children by European communist societies, the latter of which resulted in the creation of “unrealistic expectations” among their young readership. Anna Horakova, University of Grenoble
《贫民窟的文化:东德和西德的朋克摇滚》杰夫·海顿著(书评)
SED对东德社会的评价。Eedy通过采用“伪公共领域”的概念来修正这一模式,在这种概念中,Jürgen Habermas将批判性公众舆论与公共领域联系在一起,在家庭空间的隐私范围内找到了其他表达形式,Eigensinn——一种允许东德公民通过将其视为国家控制的媒体无法触及的范围来实现国内空间正常化的机制——发挥着重要作用。与Mary Fulbrook一起,Eedy将民主德国作为一个利基社会归因于SED政权的稳定作用,出于这个原因,SED政权非正式地允许在私人领域以允许的方式(例如通过公民请愿)表达批评。儿童漫画书的传播和消费属于这一类——Eedy恰当地将东德漫画书记录为有争议的权力场所,在那里,漫画创作者(例如,在Mosaik的漫画人物Digedag的随意、反目的的时间旅行中)或儿童自己都在对抗政权的完全监督(通过漫画书来表达他们在民主德国社会主义下的童年经历)。通过分析写给FDJ的信件,第三章“权力、特征和通过漫画构建空间”进一步探讨了国家与漫画读者之间的相互作用,漫画读者是一个潜在的自由场所,后者将其兴趣和批判性反思投射到了这个自由场所上。Eedy在令人回味的第四章(“逃离、逃亡和莫萨克和阿特兹漫画旅行的文化帝国主义”)中进一步探讨了这一点,该章探讨了漫画对旅行的广泛而有问题的描述,认为旅行与他们所谓的反帝国主义精神以及欧洲共产主义社会为儿童提供的可能性不相容,后者导致年轻读者产生了“不切实际的期望”。Anna Horakova,格勒诺布尔大学
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
71
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信