Integrated planning that safeguards ecosystems and balances multiple objectives in coastal Belize

Gregory M. Verutes, K. Arkema, Chantalle Clarke-Samuels, S. Wood, Amy K. Rosenthal, Samir Rosado, Maritza Canto, N. Bood, M. Ruckelshaus
{"title":"Integrated planning that safeguards ecosystems and balances multiple objectives in coastal Belize","authors":"Gregory M. Verutes, K. Arkema, Chantalle Clarke-Samuels, S. Wood, Amy K. Rosenthal, Samir Rosado, Maritza Canto, N. Bood, M. Ruckelshaus","doi":"10.1080/21513732.2017.1345979","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT A growing number of nations aim to design coastal plans to reduce conflicts in space and safeguard ecosystems that provide important benefits to people and economies. Critics of coastal and ocean planning point to a complicated process with many actors, objectives, and uncertain outcomes. This paper explores one such decision-making process in Belize, which combines ecosystem service modeling, stakeholder participation, and spatial planning to design the country’s first integrated coastal zone management plan, officially approved by the government in August 2016. We assessed risk to three coastal-marine habitats posed by eight human uses and quantified current and future delivery of three ecosystem services: protection from storms, catch and revenue from lobster fishing, and tourism expenditures to identify a preferred zoning scheme. We found that a highly adaptive team of planners, scientists, and analysts can overcome common planning obstacles, including a dearth of data describing the health of the coastal zone and the many uses it supports, complicated legal and political landscapes, and limited in-country technical capacity. Our work in Belize serves as an example for how to use science about the ways in which nature benefits people to effectively and transparently inform coastal and ocean planning decisions around the world. EDITED BY Joao Rodrigues","PeriodicalId":31680,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Biodiversity Science Ecosystem Services Management","volume":"13 1","pages":"1 - 17"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/21513732.2017.1345979","citationCount":"41","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Biodiversity Science Ecosystem Services Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21513732.2017.1345979","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 41

Abstract

ABSTRACT A growing number of nations aim to design coastal plans to reduce conflicts in space and safeguard ecosystems that provide important benefits to people and economies. Critics of coastal and ocean planning point to a complicated process with many actors, objectives, and uncertain outcomes. This paper explores one such decision-making process in Belize, which combines ecosystem service modeling, stakeholder participation, and spatial planning to design the country’s first integrated coastal zone management plan, officially approved by the government in August 2016. We assessed risk to three coastal-marine habitats posed by eight human uses and quantified current and future delivery of three ecosystem services: protection from storms, catch and revenue from lobster fishing, and tourism expenditures to identify a preferred zoning scheme. We found that a highly adaptive team of planners, scientists, and analysts can overcome common planning obstacles, including a dearth of data describing the health of the coastal zone and the many uses it supports, complicated legal and political landscapes, and limited in-country technical capacity. Our work in Belize serves as an example for how to use science about the ways in which nature benefits people to effectively and transparently inform coastal and ocean planning decisions around the world. EDITED BY Joao Rodrigues
在伯利兹沿海保护生态系统和平衡多重目标的综合规划
摘要:越来越多的国家致力于设计沿海计划,以减少太空冲突,保护为人民和经济带来重要利益的生态系统。海岸和海洋规划的批评者指出,这是一个复杂的过程,有许多参与者、目标和不确定的结果。本文探讨了伯利兹的一个决策过程,该过程结合了生态系统服务建模、利益相关者参与和空间规划,设计了该国首个综合海岸带管理计划,该计划于2016年8月正式获得政府批准。我们评估了八种人类用途对三个沿海海洋栖息地造成的风险,并量化了三种生态系统服务的当前和未来提供情况:风暴保护、龙虾捕捞的捕获量和收入,以及旅游支出,以确定首选的分区方案。我们发现,一个由规划者、科学家和分析师组成的高度适应性团队可以克服常见的规划障碍,包括缺乏描述沿海地区健康状况及其支持的多种用途的数据,复杂的法律和政治环境,以及国内技术能力有限。我们在伯利兹的工作是一个例子,说明如何利用自然造福人类的科学方法,有效、透明地为世界各地的海岸和海洋规划决策提供信息。Joao Rodrigues编辑
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
46 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书