Change the rules, change the game? Offensive tactics in elite men’s water polo from London to Tokyo

IF 2.1 4区 教育学 Q1 Health Professions
Dylan Bernardi, Lucy Lynn Davis, James Graham, John Mayberry
{"title":"Change the rules, change the game? Offensive tactics in elite men’s water polo from London to Tokyo","authors":"Dylan Bernardi, Lucy Lynn Davis, James Graham, John Mayberry","doi":"10.1080/24748668.2022.2106109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The sport of water polo has frequently undergone modifications throughout its history with two major sets of new rules being implemented in the last decade alone. This paper investigates changes in game play at the elite men’s level over this time, comparing tactical decisions and outcomes from the 2012 London with the 2020 Tokyo Olympics. A detailed analysis of over 4000 plays shows that the distribution of offensive tactical choices changed significantly over this eight-year period with 2020 teams more frequently relying on perimeter shooting and less frequently on counterattacks, centre play, and direct shots. Centre play was the only offensive tactic with a significant increase in efficiency rating. At the game level, major foul calling rates decreased with significantly fewer offensive fouls and exclusion fouls on the ball in 2020. A linear model for predicting final score differential based on differences in game statistics found that number of exclusions, exclusion conversion rate, number of counterattacks, penalty shots, and perimeter efficiency rating were all significant predictors of final game outcomes. There were no significant interactions between year and predictors although there was some evidence that perimeter efficiency rating played a more important role in 2020 compared to 2012.","PeriodicalId":49049,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport","volume":"22 1","pages":"604 - 620"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24748668.2022.2106109","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT The sport of water polo has frequently undergone modifications throughout its history with two major sets of new rules being implemented in the last decade alone. This paper investigates changes in game play at the elite men’s level over this time, comparing tactical decisions and outcomes from the 2012 London with the 2020 Tokyo Olympics. A detailed analysis of over 4000 plays shows that the distribution of offensive tactical choices changed significantly over this eight-year period with 2020 teams more frequently relying on perimeter shooting and less frequently on counterattacks, centre play, and direct shots. Centre play was the only offensive tactic with a significant increase in efficiency rating. At the game level, major foul calling rates decreased with significantly fewer offensive fouls and exclusion fouls on the ball in 2020. A linear model for predicting final score differential based on differences in game statistics found that number of exclusions, exclusion conversion rate, number of counterattacks, penalty shots, and perimeter efficiency rating were all significant predictors of final game outcomes. There were no significant interactions between year and predictors although there was some evidence that perimeter efficiency rating played a more important role in 2020 compared to 2012.
改变规则,改变游戏?从伦敦到东京精英男子水球的进攻战术
摘要水球运动在其历史上经常发生变化,仅在过去十年中就实施了两套主要的新规则。本文调查了这段时间精英男子比赛的变化,比较了2012年伦敦奥运会和2020年东京奥运会的战术决策和结果。对4000多场比赛的详细分析表明,在这八年的时间里,进攻战术选择的分布发生了显著变化,2020支球队更频繁地依赖外线投篮,而不太频繁地依赖反击、中锋和直接投篮。中锋战术是唯一一种效率显著提高的进攻战术。在比赛层面,2020年,主要犯规率下降,进攻犯规和排除性犯规明显减少。一个基于比赛统计差异预测最终得分差异的线性模型发现,排除次数、排除转化率、反击次数、罚球次数和外围效率评级都是最终比赛结果的重要预测因素。尽管有一些证据表明,与2012年相比,2020年的周边效率评级发挥了更重要的作用,但年份和预测因素之间没有显著的相互作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
38
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport aims to present current original research into sports performance. In so doing, the journal contributes to our general knowledge of sports performance making findings available to a wide audience of academics and practitioners.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信