Meta-analysis of studies on the acquisition of receptive skills and vocabulary in CLIL

IF 0.1 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Ivana Cimermanová
{"title":"Meta-analysis of studies on the acquisition of receptive skills and vocabulary in CLIL","authors":"Ivana Cimermanová","doi":"10.2478/jolace-2020-0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Content and language integrated learning (CLIL) is a major area of interest within the field of formal education. There are numerous studies presenting data and results of CLIL implementation. The positive impacts have been reported in building positive attitudes to language learning, to content subject learning, increasing efficacy of language learning. Questions have been raised about the factors that (may) affect research results and their interpretation. Many small studies bring statistically non-significant data as they use small convenience samples. Meta-analyses enable the researchers to synthesise data from research with the same characteristics. The present article analyses the studies that focus on CLIL implementation at primary and secondary schools with special focus on receptive skills and vocabulary gains. Out of 385 selected studies were 9 included and applying randomised-effect model evaluated. The analysis found no statistically significant differences between the CLIL and EFL groups in listening and reading performance. Concerning vocabulary the statistically significant difference in favour of CLIL (p<0,0001) with overall estimate effect 0,84 and confidence interval ranging from 0,56 to 1,11 was observed.","PeriodicalId":41689,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Language and Cultural Education","volume":"8 1","pages":"30 - 52"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Language and Cultural Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/jolace-2020-0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Content and language integrated learning (CLIL) is a major area of interest within the field of formal education. There are numerous studies presenting data and results of CLIL implementation. The positive impacts have been reported in building positive attitudes to language learning, to content subject learning, increasing efficacy of language learning. Questions have been raised about the factors that (may) affect research results and their interpretation. Many small studies bring statistically non-significant data as they use small convenience samples. Meta-analyses enable the researchers to synthesise data from research with the same characteristics. The present article analyses the studies that focus on CLIL implementation at primary and secondary schools with special focus on receptive skills and vocabulary gains. Out of 385 selected studies were 9 included and applying randomised-effect model evaluated. The analysis found no statistically significant differences between the CLIL and EFL groups in listening and reading performance. Concerning vocabulary the statistically significant difference in favour of CLIL (p<0,0001) with overall estimate effect 0,84 and confidence interval ranging from 0,56 to 1,11 was observed.
CLIL中接受技能习得与词汇习得的meta分析
内容和语言综合学习(CLIL)是正规教育领域的一个重要研究领域。有许多研究提供了CLIL实施的数据和结果。在建立积极的语言学习态度、内容学习、主题学习、提高语言学习效率等方面都有积极的影响。人们对影响研究结果的因素及其解释提出了疑问。许多小型研究由于使用了方便的小样本,因此带来了统计上不显著的数据。荟萃分析使研究人员能够从具有相同特征的研究中综合数据。本文分析了有关中、小学CLIL实施的研究,重点关注了接受能力和词汇量的增加。在385项选定的研究中,有9项被纳入并应用随机效应模型进行评估。分析发现中外语组和英语组在听力和阅读表现上没有统计学上的显著差异。在词汇方面,CLIL的总体估计效应为0.84,置信区间为0.56 ~ 1.11,差异有统计学意义(p< 0.0001)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Language and Cultural Education
Journal of Language and Cultural Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信