BSHM meeting news

IF 0.6 Q3 MATHEMATICS
Bshm Meeting Coordinator, Isobel Falconer
{"title":"BSHM meeting news","authors":"Bshm Meeting Coordinator, Isobel Falconer","doi":"10.1080/26375451.2022.2135064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"s from past meetings History of mathematics and flight Saturday 2 July 2022 Concorde Centre, Manchester Airport A day of talks about the history of mathematics and flight. Flight was broadly conceived to cover the flight of man-made objects and animals; flight formation, navigation and control. The day included a tour of Concorde. Kate Hindle (St Andrews): D’Arcy Thompson and flight D’Arcy Thompson (1860–1948) is most remembered for his influential book On Growth and Form (1917), which looked to maths to explain why biological creatures take the shapes that they take. In January 1917, a few months before this book was released, Thompson had a letter to the editor published in Nature titled ‘Stability in Flight’. A month later Herbert Maxwell (1845–1937) – a baronet, politician, and fellow of several learned societies – published a letter in Nature as a criticism of Thompson’s work. Thompson reacted to this criticism with a defensive response letter, showing that he was affected by it. This exchange also highlights how Thompson conceptualized advancements in maths as a guiding light for biology, showing how his views on flight coincide with his other biomathematical work. Jane Wess (Independent): Benjamin Robins: Elegant Mathematics Versus Experimental Inconvenience? While academically a constituent of fluid mechanics, practically ballistics was an important area of knowledge for nation states in the eighteenth century. William Mountaine, a mathematics teacher, wrote in 1781 ‘it is not possible in the nature of things for any one kingdom to continue long in a state of peace, the art of gunnery has from time to time engaged the attention of the most eminent mathematicians’. However, the essential nature of the knowledge of the flight of cannon balls did not result in an efficacious mathematical description for a remarkable length of time. Whereas both Huygens and Newton had acknowledged the role of air resistance, textbooks continued to discuss parabolas following Galileo, Torricelli, Halley, and Cotes until the end of the eighteenth century. The obvious question is ‘why?’ There may be several factors at play, including the status of Robins, who challenged the status quo, but it will be argued that beautiful and simple mathematics can be beguiling. As for the case of epicycloidal teeth in gearing, it seems many of those who advocated a mathematical approach were not completely au fait with the most advanced thinking on the topic, in this case by Huygens, Newton, and of course later and most effectively, by Euler. Deborah Kent (St Andrews): A champion’s counterexample? PG Tait and the flight of a golf ball Nineteenth-century mathematician and physicist Peter Guthrie Tait (1831–1901) is well known for the Treatise on Natural Philosophy, which he co-wrote with William Thomson (later Lord Kelvin), and collaborations with James Clerk Maxwell. Less familiar are his aerodynamical studies from the 1890s, which resulted in over a dozen papers on the path of a rotating spherical projectile. Tait’s culminating work Volume 37 (2022) 259","PeriodicalId":36683,"journal":{"name":"British Journal for the History of Mathematics","volume":"37 1","pages":"258 - 265"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal for the History of Mathematics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/26375451.2022.2135064","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

s from past meetings History of mathematics and flight Saturday 2 July 2022 Concorde Centre, Manchester Airport A day of talks about the history of mathematics and flight. Flight was broadly conceived to cover the flight of man-made objects and animals; flight formation, navigation and control. The day included a tour of Concorde. Kate Hindle (St Andrews): D’Arcy Thompson and flight D’Arcy Thompson (1860–1948) is most remembered for his influential book On Growth and Form (1917), which looked to maths to explain why biological creatures take the shapes that they take. In January 1917, a few months before this book was released, Thompson had a letter to the editor published in Nature titled ‘Stability in Flight’. A month later Herbert Maxwell (1845–1937) – a baronet, politician, and fellow of several learned societies – published a letter in Nature as a criticism of Thompson’s work. Thompson reacted to this criticism with a defensive response letter, showing that he was affected by it. This exchange also highlights how Thompson conceptualized advancements in maths as a guiding light for biology, showing how his views on flight coincide with his other biomathematical work. Jane Wess (Independent): Benjamin Robins: Elegant Mathematics Versus Experimental Inconvenience? While academically a constituent of fluid mechanics, practically ballistics was an important area of knowledge for nation states in the eighteenth century. William Mountaine, a mathematics teacher, wrote in 1781 ‘it is not possible in the nature of things for any one kingdom to continue long in a state of peace, the art of gunnery has from time to time engaged the attention of the most eminent mathematicians’. However, the essential nature of the knowledge of the flight of cannon balls did not result in an efficacious mathematical description for a remarkable length of time. Whereas both Huygens and Newton had acknowledged the role of air resistance, textbooks continued to discuss parabolas following Galileo, Torricelli, Halley, and Cotes until the end of the eighteenth century. The obvious question is ‘why?’ There may be several factors at play, including the status of Robins, who challenged the status quo, but it will be argued that beautiful and simple mathematics can be beguiling. As for the case of epicycloidal teeth in gearing, it seems many of those who advocated a mathematical approach were not completely au fait with the most advanced thinking on the topic, in this case by Huygens, Newton, and of course later and most effectively, by Euler. Deborah Kent (St Andrews): A champion’s counterexample? PG Tait and the flight of a golf ball Nineteenth-century mathematician and physicist Peter Guthrie Tait (1831–1901) is well known for the Treatise on Natural Philosophy, which he co-wrote with William Thomson (later Lord Kelvin), and collaborations with James Clerk Maxwell. Less familiar are his aerodynamical studies from the 1890s, which resulted in over a dozen papers on the path of a rotating spherical projectile. Tait’s culminating work Volume 37 (2022) 259
BSHM会议新闻
s来自过去的会议数学和飞行史2022年7月2日星期六曼彻斯特机场协和式飞机中心关于数学和飞行历史的一天讲座。飞行被广泛认为涵盖了人造物体和动物的飞行;飞行编队、导航和控制。当天还参观了协和式飞机。Kate Hindle(圣安德鲁斯):达西·汤普森和飞行达西·汤普森(1860–1948)因其颇具影响力的著作《生长与形态》(1917)而被人们铭记,该书试图用数学来解释生物为什么会有它们所形成的形状。1917年1月,也就是这本书出版的几个月前,汤普森给编辑写了一封信,题为《飞行中的稳定性》。一个月后,赫伯特·麦克斯韦(1845-1937)——一位准男爵、政治家和几个学术团体的成员——在《自然》杂志上发表了一封信,批评汤普森的工作。汤普森以一封辩护回复信回应了这一批评,表明他受到了批评的影响。这封交流还强调了汤普森如何将数学进步概念化为生物学的指路明灯,表明他对飞行的看法与他的其他生物数学工作相一致。简·韦斯(独立报):本杰明·罗宾斯:优雅的数学与实验不便?虽然在学术上是流体力学的一个组成部分,但实际上弹道学是18世纪民族国家的一个重要知识领域。数学老师William Mountaine在1781年写道:“从本质上讲,任何一个王国都不可能长期处于和平状态,射击艺术不时引起最著名数学家的注意。”。然而,炮弹飞行知识的本质并没有在相当长的一段时间内产生有效的数学描述。惠更斯和牛顿都承认空气阻力的作用,但教科书继续讨论伽利略、托里切利、哈雷和科茨之后的抛物线,直到18世纪末。显而易见的问题是“为什么?”可能有几个因素在起作用,包括罗宾斯的地位,他挑战了现状,但有人会说,美丽而简单的数学可能很迷人。至于齿轮传动中的外摆线齿的情况,似乎许多提倡数学方法的人并不完全熟悉这个问题上最先进的思想,在这种情况下是惠更斯、牛顿,当然还有后来最有效的欧拉。黛博拉·肯特(圣安德鲁斯):冠军的反例?PG Tait和高尔夫球的飞行19世纪数学家和物理学家Peter Guthrie Tait(1831–1901)因与William Thomson(后来的开尔文勋爵)合著的《自然哲学论》以及与James Clerk Maxwell的合作而闻名。不太为人熟悉的是他在19世纪90年代的空气动力学研究,该研究发表了十几篇关于旋转球形抛射体路径的论文。泰特的巅峰之作第37卷(2022)259
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
British Journal for the History of Mathematics
British Journal for the History of Mathematics Arts and Humanities-History and Philosophy of Science
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信