Change recipients’ resistance and salience to organizational re-creation: the effects of participation and coercion strategies on change derailment

Q2 Social Sciences
Y. Alhezzani
{"title":"Change recipients’ resistance and salience to organizational re-creation: the effects of participation and coercion strategies on change derailment","authors":"Y. Alhezzani","doi":"10.1108/omj-10-2018-0608","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For change initiatives to succeed, change managers are required to address recipients’ needs. Although strategies to deal with change recipients and their resistance are widely explored, there is a dearth of studies that consider the different salience of change recipients. This paper aims to propose a framework on the effects of participation and coercion as strategies to deal with change recipients and their impact on change derailment.,Conceptual based upon that change recipients are classified into three levels according to their salience in relation to change. Based upon the recipients’ power and legitimacy in relation to change, stakeholder salience theory constitutes a theoretical provision used in this research to categorize the salience of change recipients.,The framework integrates change recipients’ salience levels (i.e. definitive, expectant and latent) and the effects of participation and coercion strategies on change derailment in times of organizational re-creation. The paper develops six hypotheses, which yield insights that advance the understanding of dealing with change recipients in the context of organizational re-creation.,The paper is conceptual and not yet tested empirically. To empirically test the framework, research adopting survey methodology to gather data from organizations that experience a re-creation change as defined in this paper. The unit of analysis for future research is described in this paper and it is how organizational re-creation is defined in this paper.,Stakeholder salience theory is used to develop a framework that combines three classes of change recipients’ salience, as well as the effects of two strategies to deal with them and their resistance (i.e. lack of involvement and coercion) to examine their influence on change derailment. The potential contribution will expand the current literature discussed in this paper about dealing with change recipients’ resistance to change.","PeriodicalId":39393,"journal":{"name":"Organization Management Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/omj-10-2018-0608","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Organization Management Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/omj-10-2018-0608","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

For change initiatives to succeed, change managers are required to address recipients’ needs. Although strategies to deal with change recipients and their resistance are widely explored, there is a dearth of studies that consider the different salience of change recipients. This paper aims to propose a framework on the effects of participation and coercion as strategies to deal with change recipients and their impact on change derailment.,Conceptual based upon that change recipients are classified into three levels according to their salience in relation to change. Based upon the recipients’ power and legitimacy in relation to change, stakeholder salience theory constitutes a theoretical provision used in this research to categorize the salience of change recipients.,The framework integrates change recipients’ salience levels (i.e. definitive, expectant and latent) and the effects of participation and coercion strategies on change derailment in times of organizational re-creation. The paper develops six hypotheses, which yield insights that advance the understanding of dealing with change recipients in the context of organizational re-creation.,The paper is conceptual and not yet tested empirically. To empirically test the framework, research adopting survey methodology to gather data from organizations that experience a re-creation change as defined in this paper. The unit of analysis for future research is described in this paper and it is how organizational re-creation is defined in this paper.,Stakeholder salience theory is used to develop a framework that combines three classes of change recipients’ salience, as well as the effects of two strategies to deal with them and their resistance (i.e. lack of involvement and coercion) to examine their influence on change derailment. The potential contribution will expand the current literature discussed in this paper about dealing with change recipients’ resistance to change.
变革接受者对组织再造的抗拒和显著性:参与和胁迫策略对变革脱轨的影响
为了使变革计划取得成功,变革管理者必须满足接受者的需求。尽管应对变革接受者及其抵制的策略被广泛探索,但缺乏考虑变革接受者不同显著性的研究。本文旨在提出一个关于参与和胁迫作为应对变革接受者的策略的影响及其对变革脱轨的影响的框架。,基于这一概念,变革接受者根据其与变革的显著性分为三个层次。基于接受者对变革的权力和合法性,利益相关者显著性理论构成了本研究用于对变革接受者的显著性进行分类的理论规定。,该框架整合了变革接受者的显著性水平(即确定性、预期性和潜在性),以及参与和胁迫策略对组织重建时期变革脱轨的影响。本文提出了六个假设,这些假设产生了见解,促进了对在组织再造背景下应对变革接受者的理解。,这篇论文是概念性的,尚未经过实证检验。为了实证检验该框架,研究采用了调查方法,从经历了本文所定义的再创造变化的组织中收集数据。本文描述了未来研究的分析单元,即本文如何定义组织再创造。,利益相关者显著性理论用于开发一个框架,该框架结合了三类变革接受者的显著性,以及两种应对策略的效果和他们的抵抗(即缺乏参与和胁迫),以检查他们对变革脱轨的影响。这一潜在贡献将扩展本文中讨论的关于处理变革接受者对变革的抵制的现有文献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Organization Management Journal
Organization Management Journal Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Organization Management Journal is a blind peer-reviewed online publication sponsored by the Eastern Academy of Management. OMJ is designed as a forum for broad philosophical, social, and practical thought about management and organizing. We are interested in papers that address the interface between theoretical insight and practical application and enhance the teaching of management. OMJ publishes scholarly empirical and theoretical papers, review articles, essays and resources for management educators. Appropriate domains include: -Organizational behavior- Business strategy and policy- Organizational theory- Human resource management- Management education, particularly experiential education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信