A nominal group technique to review undergraduate medical students’ training in emergency care

IF 0.4 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
D. Hagemeister, M. J. Labuschagne
{"title":"A nominal group technique to review undergraduate medical students’ training in emergency care","authors":"D. Hagemeister, M. J. Labuschagne","doi":"10.7196/ajhpe.2023.v15i1.1573","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background. The management of clinical emergencies is an essential skill for medical practitioners; therefore, proper training in these skills is crucial. This is a review of emergency care training by recent graduates of a medical programme to provide feedback on the usefulness of their training experience for entry into clinical practice. Academic clinicians working in the clinical environment, who provide the training, and academic managers who manage the training programme, could provide valuable inputs into reviewing the emergency care training programme contextualised for the uniquely South African challenges.Objectives. To obtain and prioritise experience-based and relevant suggestions for improving the current teaching and to invite comment on the suggestions from the relevant managers.Methods. Research was conducted in three phases using a nominal group technique to review an undergraduate medical programme. In the first phase, recent graduates from the existing programme identified its strengths and weaknesses. In the second phase, academic clinicians and technical experts provided suggestions for addressing these challenges. In the third phase, data obtained were discussed with academic managers responsible for the undergraduate medical programme.Results. Findings were grouped into thematic categories: skills and short courses, module structure and content, experiential learning opportunities, health professions educational practice and interprofessional education. Opportunities to gain experience in emergencies in different clinical fields and as a multi-professional team, both in simulation and real-life practice, were among the highlights of the findings.Conclusion. Many of the suggested improvements, such as a dedicated emergency care module, and more simulated and small-group case-based teaching, are achievable with the given resources. Additionally, with recent changes due to the COVID‑19 pandemic and lockdown, an environment for change that benefits online content delivery was created. The creation of longitudinal themes will be an enhancement of the current programme.","PeriodicalId":43683,"journal":{"name":"African Journal of Health Professions Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Journal of Health Professions Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7196/ajhpe.2023.v15i1.1573","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background. The management of clinical emergencies is an essential skill for medical practitioners; therefore, proper training in these skills is crucial. This is a review of emergency care training by recent graduates of a medical programme to provide feedback on the usefulness of their training experience for entry into clinical practice. Academic clinicians working in the clinical environment, who provide the training, and academic managers who manage the training programme, could provide valuable inputs into reviewing the emergency care training programme contextualised for the uniquely South African challenges.Objectives. To obtain and prioritise experience-based and relevant suggestions for improving the current teaching and to invite comment on the suggestions from the relevant managers.Methods. Research was conducted in three phases using a nominal group technique to review an undergraduate medical programme. In the first phase, recent graduates from the existing programme identified its strengths and weaknesses. In the second phase, academic clinicians and technical experts provided suggestions for addressing these challenges. In the third phase, data obtained were discussed with academic managers responsible for the undergraduate medical programme.Results. Findings were grouped into thematic categories: skills and short courses, module structure and content, experiential learning opportunities, health professions educational practice and interprofessional education. Opportunities to gain experience in emergencies in different clinical fields and as a multi-professional team, both in simulation and real-life practice, were among the highlights of the findings.Conclusion. Many of the suggested improvements, such as a dedicated emergency care module, and more simulated and small-group case-based teaching, are achievable with the given resources. Additionally, with recent changes due to the COVID‑19 pandemic and lockdown, an environment for change that benefits online content delivery was created. The creation of longitudinal themes will be an enhancement of the current programme.
应用名义分组技术评估医学生急诊培训情况
背景临床紧急情况的管理是医生的一项基本技能;因此,对这些技能进行适当的培训至关重要。这是对医学项目应届毕业生的急救培训的回顾,旨在就他们的培训经验对进入临床实践的有用性提供反馈。在临床环境中工作的提供培训的学术临床医生和管理培训计划的学术管理人员可以为审查针对南非独特挑战的急救培训计划提供宝贵的投入。目标。获取并优先考虑基于经验的相关建议,以改进当前教学,并邀请相关管理人员对这些建议发表意见。方法。研究分三个阶段进行,使用名义小组技术对本科生医学课程进行审查。在第一阶段,现有方案的应届毕业生确定了其长处和短处。在第二阶段,学术临床医生和技术专家为应对这些挑战提供了建议。在第三阶段,与负责本科生医学项目的学术管理人员讨论了获得的数据。后果研究结果分为主题类别:技能和短期课程、模块结构和内容、体验式学习机会、卫生专业教育实践和跨专业教育。研究结果的亮点之一是有机会在不同的临床领域以及作为一个多专业团队,在模拟和现实生活中获得紧急情况的经验。结论许多建议的改进,如专门的急救模块,以及更多的模拟和小组案例教学,都可以在给定的资源下实现。此外,随着新冠肺炎疫情和封锁导致的最近变化,创造了一个有利于在线内容交付的变革环境。纵向主题的设立将加强目前的方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
African Journal of Health Professions Education
African Journal of Health Professions Education HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信