Therapists and #MeToo: A Qualitative Survey of Personal Reactions and Professional Experiences

IF 1.1 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Rebekah Smart, A. Dilley, Melissa L. Ward, Sapna B. Chopra
{"title":"Therapists and #MeToo: A Qualitative Survey of Personal Reactions and Professional Experiences","authors":"Rebekah Smart, A. Dilley, Melissa L. Ward, Sapna B. Chopra","doi":"10.1080/02703149.2021.1971429","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The purpose of the present study was to understand how therapists were experiencing the #MeToo movement, both personally and professionally. In an anonymous online survey (via Qualtrics) sent to multiple therapist listservs and Facebook pages, training programs, and personal contacts, we asked therapists to respond to four open-ended questions about (a) their personal reactions to the #MeToo movement, (b) their clients’ reactions, (c) their subsequent interactions with clients, and (d) their ideas for change going forward. The convenience sample of 59 consisted of mostly liberal and feminist psychologists and counselors. They identified with diverse gender, racial/ethnic, and sexual orientation statuses, but most (78%) identified as women and over half (59%) as European American/White. We analyzed written narratives using grounded theory and consensual qualitative research methods. Six higher-order themes emerged: personal histories and reactions to the movement, complexities of response (optimism and concern), societal context shared by therapists and clients, clinical realities impacted by #MeToo, using standard and context-specific therapeutic strategies, and future directions (what therapists can do). We discuss findings in light of shared trauma (or shared reality), in which participants navigated their histories of sexual violence and media exposure while responding to clients, friends, family, and colleagues with similar experiences. Participants noted the need for increased self-care, as well as growth areas for the field, including the need for therapists to have increased awareness of issues of gender and power, intersectionality, and sexual violence treatment. Implications for the field and future research are discussed.","PeriodicalId":46696,"journal":{"name":"Women & Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Women & Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02703149.2021.1971429","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The purpose of the present study was to understand how therapists were experiencing the #MeToo movement, both personally and professionally. In an anonymous online survey (via Qualtrics) sent to multiple therapist listservs and Facebook pages, training programs, and personal contacts, we asked therapists to respond to four open-ended questions about (a) their personal reactions to the #MeToo movement, (b) their clients’ reactions, (c) their subsequent interactions with clients, and (d) their ideas for change going forward. The convenience sample of 59 consisted of mostly liberal and feminist psychologists and counselors. They identified with diverse gender, racial/ethnic, and sexual orientation statuses, but most (78%) identified as women and over half (59%) as European American/White. We analyzed written narratives using grounded theory and consensual qualitative research methods. Six higher-order themes emerged: personal histories and reactions to the movement, complexities of response (optimism and concern), societal context shared by therapists and clients, clinical realities impacted by #MeToo, using standard and context-specific therapeutic strategies, and future directions (what therapists can do). We discuss findings in light of shared trauma (or shared reality), in which participants navigated their histories of sexual violence and media exposure while responding to clients, friends, family, and colleagues with similar experiences. Participants noted the need for increased self-care, as well as growth areas for the field, including the need for therapists to have increased awareness of issues of gender and power, intersectionality, and sexual violence treatment. Implications for the field and future research are discussed.
治疗师和#MeToo:个人反应和专业经验的定性调查
本研究的目的是了解治疗师是如何经历#MeToo运动的,无论是个人还是专业。在一份匿名在线调查中(通过Qualtrics)发送给多个治疗师列表服务器和Facebook页面、培训项目和个人联系人,我们要求治疗师回答四个开放式问题,包括(a)他们对#MeToo运动的个人反应,(b)他们客户的反应,(c)他们与客户的后续互动,以及(d)他们对未来变革的想法。方便样本的59人主要由自由派和女权主义心理学家和咨询师组成。他们有不同的性别、种族/民族和性取向身份,但大多数(78%)认为自己是女性,超过一半(59%)认为自己是欧美/白人。我们使用扎根理论和共识定性研究方法分析书面叙述。六个更高层次的主题出现了:个人历史和对运动的反应,反应的复杂性(乐观和关注),治疗师和客户共享的社会背景,受#MeToo影响的临床现实,使用标准和特定环境的治疗策略,以及未来的方向(治疗师可以做什么)。我们根据共同的创伤(或共同的现实)来讨论研究结果,在这些研究中,参与者在回应有类似经历的客户、朋友、家人和同事的同时,梳理了他们的性暴力史和媒体曝光。与会者指出需要增加自我照顾,以及该领域的发展领域,包括治疗师需要提高对性别和权力、交叉性和性暴力治疗等问题的认识。讨论了本研究的意义和未来的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Women & Therapy
Women & Therapy Multiple-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.80%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: Women & Therapy is the only professional journal that focuses entirely on the complex interrelationship between women and the therapeutic experience. Devoted to descriptive, theoretical, clinical, and empirical perspectives on the topic of women and therapy, the journal is intended for feminist practitioners as well as for individuals interested in the practice of feminist therapy. The journal focuses on a wide range of content areas, including: •issues in the process of therapy with female clients •problems in living that affect women in greater proportion than men, such as depression, eating disorders, and agoraphobia •women"s traditional and nontraditional roles in society and how these affect and can be affected by therapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信