Comparative analysis of the criteria for conducting clinical trials of medicines in Russian Federation, the United States of America and the European Union

Q4 Medicine
D. A. Lebedeva
{"title":"Comparative analysis of the criteria for conducting clinical trials \nof medicines in Russian Federation, the United States of America \nand the European Union","authors":"D. A. Lebedeva","doi":"10.47470/0044-197x-2023-67-1-78-84","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. As a part of the admissions to the market for medicines, there are requirements and restrictions that apply to the application of the “risk-based approach”. Requirements differ by subject, object of the tstudy, individual characteristics. The author carried out a comparative legal analysis of the requirements and criteria established by the legislation of the Russian Federation, USA, and EU. \nThe purpose of the study is to identify criteria, limitations in the process of conducting clinical trials of medicines involving humans. \nMaterial and methods. The author studied the Russian legislation in the field of restrictions on clinical trials of preparations and analyzed the relevant experience of the USA and EU. Methods of structural analysis, logical generalizations, classifications, comparative legal method were used. \nResults. The Russian regulation of drug trials provides for a fairly wide and complete list of restrictions and requirements that contribute to the implementation of a risk-based approach. At the same time, EU and USA legislation is more focused on protecting the rights of participants under study, Russian standards must be supplemented in terms of work with minors during clinical trials. The Russian legal model of clinical trials may develop in the area of ​​liberalizing restrictions and establishing more detailed the procedure for participation in the clinical trials of certain categories of persons. \nLimitations. This article is compiled on the basis of 67 sources available to the author (student libraries, Russian databases of articles and journals). The study is limited to a sample of 27 sources, of which 10 are normative acts on the topic of work. \nConclusion. The article develops criteria for comparing the limitations of clinical trials of medicines in the Russian Federation, USA and EU, and suggests recommendations for improving the Russian regulatory model. A transparent range of requirements for conducting clinical trials ensures the safety for the population, including certain categories of people. Russian regulation should be improved in terms of ensuring the protection of the rights of the maximum number of participants, depending on national priorities, taking into account the best foreign practices.","PeriodicalId":39241,"journal":{"name":"Zdravookhranenie Rossiiskoi Federatsii / Ministerstvo zdravookhraneniia RSFSR","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zdravookhranenie Rossiiskoi Federatsii / Ministerstvo zdravookhraneniia RSFSR","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47470/0044-197x-2023-67-1-78-84","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. As a part of the admissions to the market for medicines, there are requirements and restrictions that apply to the application of the “risk-based approach”. Requirements differ by subject, object of the tstudy, individual characteristics. The author carried out a comparative legal analysis of the requirements and criteria established by the legislation of the Russian Federation, USA, and EU. The purpose of the study is to identify criteria, limitations in the process of conducting clinical trials of medicines involving humans. Material and methods. The author studied the Russian legislation in the field of restrictions on clinical trials of preparations and analyzed the relevant experience of the USA and EU. Methods of structural analysis, logical generalizations, classifications, comparative legal method were used. Results. The Russian regulation of drug trials provides for a fairly wide and complete list of restrictions and requirements that contribute to the implementation of a risk-based approach. At the same time, EU and USA legislation is more focused on protecting the rights of participants under study, Russian standards must be supplemented in terms of work with minors during clinical trials. The Russian legal model of clinical trials may develop in the area of ​​liberalizing restrictions and establishing more detailed the procedure for participation in the clinical trials of certain categories of persons. Limitations. This article is compiled on the basis of 67 sources available to the author (student libraries, Russian databases of articles and journals). The study is limited to a sample of 27 sources, of which 10 are normative acts on the topic of work. Conclusion. The article develops criteria for comparing the limitations of clinical trials of medicines in the Russian Federation, USA and EU, and suggests recommendations for improving the Russian regulatory model. A transparent range of requirements for conducting clinical trials ensures the safety for the population, including certain categories of people. Russian regulation should be improved in terms of ensuring the protection of the rights of the maximum number of participants, depending on national priorities, taking into account the best foreign practices.
对俄罗斯联邦、美利坚合众国和欧洲联盟进行药物临床试验标准的比较分析
介绍作为药品市场准入的一部分,有一些要求和限制适用于“基于风险的方法”的应用。要求因学科、研究对象和个人特点而异。作者对俄罗斯联邦、美国和欧盟的立法要求和标准进行了比较法律分析。该研究的目的是确定涉及人类的药物临床试验过程中的标准和限制。材料和方法。作者研究了俄罗斯在制剂临床试验限制方面的立法,并分析了美国和欧盟的相关经验。采用结构分析法、逻辑概括法、分类法、比较法等方法。后果俄罗斯的药物试验条例提供了一份相当广泛和完整的限制和要求清单,有助于实施基于风险的方法。与此同时,欧盟和美国的立法更侧重于保护受试者的权利,俄罗斯的标准必须在临床试验期间与未成年人合作方面得到补充。俄罗斯临床试验的法律模式可能在​​放宽限制,并制定更详细的参与某些类别人员临床试验的程序。局限性本文根据作者可获得的67个来源(学生图书馆、俄罗斯文章和期刊数据库)进行汇编。该研究仅限于27个来源的样本,其中10个是关于工作主题的规范性法案。结论本文制定了比较俄罗斯联邦、美国和欧盟药物临床试验局限性的标准,并提出了改进俄罗斯监管模式的建议。进行临床试验的一系列透明要求确保了人群的安全,包括某些类别的人群。应根据国家优先事项,在考虑到外国最佳做法的情况下,改进俄罗斯的监管,以确保最大数量的参与者的权利得到保护。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
66
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信