The knowledge, attitude and practices (KAP) of Industry 4.0 between construction practitioners and academicians in Malaysia: a comparative study

IF 3.1 Q2 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
Nadia Safura Zabidin, S. Belayutham, C. K. C. Che Ibrahim
{"title":"The knowledge, attitude and practices (KAP) of Industry 4.0 between construction practitioners and academicians in Malaysia: a comparative study","authors":"Nadia Safura Zabidin, S. Belayutham, C. K. C. Che Ibrahim","doi":"10.1108/ci-05-2022-0109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe purpose of this study is to explore the knowledge, attitude and practices (KAP) of Industry 4.0 between the academicians and industry players in construction engineering, further suggesting a mechanism to narrow the gap between the distinct parties.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis study was conducted through structured online and face-to-face interviews, using KAP survey, and semi-structured interviews. This constructive research was conducted among Malaysian construction industry players and academicians from the construction engineering department in public universities.\n\n\nFindings\nThe findings exhibit the similarities and differences of KAP between academics and industry on Industry 4.0 in construction engineering. In general, both categories of respondents have displayed more similarities than differences in all aspects, except for knowledge. The better knowledge profile of Industry 4.0 among the academicians reflects the nature of the academic works that constantly seek new knowledge, thus suggesting the establishment of an industry-academic (I-A) knowledge equilibrium framework to leverage the knowledge profile between both parties.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThis exploratory study that showcases the perspective of the academia and industry practitioners on Industry 4.0 acts as a cornerstone for bridging the gap between the two distinct sectors within the same field.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThe gap between the academic and industry was highlighted, further establishing the I-A knowledge equilibrium framework that could also be applied to other fields of study.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe originality of this paper was the profiling of the KAP of Industry 4.0 for the academicians and industry players in construction engineering, further distinguishing the gap between both parties.\n","PeriodicalId":45580,"journal":{"name":"Construction Innovation-England","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Construction Innovation-England","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ci-05-2022-0109","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study is to explore the knowledge, attitude and practices (KAP) of Industry 4.0 between the academicians and industry players in construction engineering, further suggesting a mechanism to narrow the gap between the distinct parties. Design/methodology/approach This study was conducted through structured online and face-to-face interviews, using KAP survey, and semi-structured interviews. This constructive research was conducted among Malaysian construction industry players and academicians from the construction engineering department in public universities. Findings The findings exhibit the similarities and differences of KAP between academics and industry on Industry 4.0 in construction engineering. In general, both categories of respondents have displayed more similarities than differences in all aspects, except for knowledge. The better knowledge profile of Industry 4.0 among the academicians reflects the nature of the academic works that constantly seek new knowledge, thus suggesting the establishment of an industry-academic (I-A) knowledge equilibrium framework to leverage the knowledge profile between both parties. Research limitations/implications This exploratory study that showcases the perspective of the academia and industry practitioners on Industry 4.0 acts as a cornerstone for bridging the gap between the two distinct sectors within the same field. Practical implications The gap between the academic and industry was highlighted, further establishing the I-A knowledge equilibrium framework that could also be applied to other fields of study. Originality/value The originality of this paper was the profiling of the KAP of Industry 4.0 for the academicians and industry players in construction engineering, further distinguishing the gap between both parties.
马来西亚建筑从业者和学者对工业4.0的知识、态度和实践(KAP)的比较研究
目的本研究旨在探讨建筑工程领域院士和行业参与者对工业4.0的知识、态度和实践(KAP),进一步提出缩小不同党派之间差距的机制。设计/方法/方法本研究通过结构化的在线和面对面访谈、KAP调查和半结构化访谈进行。这项建设性的研究是在马来西亚建筑业参与者和公立大学建筑工程系院士中进行的。研究结果显示了学术界和工业界在建筑工程工业4.0方面的KAP的异同。总的来说,除知识外,这两类受访者在所有方面都表现出更多的相似性而非差异性。院士们对工业4.0的更好的知识图谱反映了学术作品不断寻求新知识的性质,从而建议建立一个工业-学术(I-A)知识平衡框架,以利用双方之间的知识图谱。研究局限性/含义这项探索性研究展示了学术界和行业从业者对工业4.0的看法,是弥合同一领域内两个不同部门之间差距的基石。实践意义强调了学术界和工业界之间的差距,进一步建立了I-A知识平衡框架,该框架也可应用于其他研究领域。独创性/价值本文的独创性是为建筑工程领域的院士和行业参与者剖析工业4.0的KAP,进一步区分了双方之间的差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Construction Innovation-England
Construction Innovation-England CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY-
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
12.10%
发文量
71
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信