A Present Past: Representations of Polish-Jewish Coexistence in Word and Image

Q4 Arts and Humanities
Katarzyna Liszka, Marcos Silber
{"title":"A Present Past: Representations of Polish-Jewish Coexistence in Word and Image","authors":"Katarzyna Liszka, Marcos Silber","doi":"10.4467/24500100STJ.19.001.11228","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Scholars have produced important studies emphasizing mutual JewishPolish coexistence, interaction, and “influence.” Despite the growing interest in multi-ethnic and multi-religious everyday coexistence, the subject of its representation has so far received only selective scholarly attention. A handful of comprehensive medium-oriented studies comparing perceptions of Polish-Jewish neighborliness have been produced, dealing primarily with coexistence on a daily basis. By applying a comparative approach and discussing how Polish-Jewish everyday coexistence has been represented in literature and art, this section is an attempt to encourage scholars to deal with this lacuna and create a more thorough picture of the modern cultural memory of “living together.” This collection of articles is partly the result of a workshop held in POLIN Museum in October 2016 that explored how the “past” is “present” in “the present.” The past is being perpetually recreated and used as a tool to construct contemporary times by those presenting and representing it. The expression “a present past” was coined in 1993 by Richard Terdiman to emphasize the persistence of the past in the present.1 We complete Terdiman’s motto by adding John Bodnar’s statement that public memory is not only an inaccurate representation of the past, but is in fact constructed according to the needs of both the present and the dreamed future, as imagined by certain social groups that have obtained the power to represent","PeriodicalId":37335,"journal":{"name":"Studia Judaica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Judaica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4467/24500100STJ.19.001.11228","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Scholars have produced important studies emphasizing mutual JewishPolish coexistence, interaction, and “influence.” Despite the growing interest in multi-ethnic and multi-religious everyday coexistence, the subject of its representation has so far received only selective scholarly attention. A handful of comprehensive medium-oriented studies comparing perceptions of Polish-Jewish neighborliness have been produced, dealing primarily with coexistence on a daily basis. By applying a comparative approach and discussing how Polish-Jewish everyday coexistence has been represented in literature and art, this section is an attempt to encourage scholars to deal with this lacuna and create a more thorough picture of the modern cultural memory of “living together.” This collection of articles is partly the result of a workshop held in POLIN Museum in October 2016 that explored how the “past” is “present” in “the present.” The past is being perpetually recreated and used as a tool to construct contemporary times by those presenting and representing it. The expression “a present past” was coined in 1993 by Richard Terdiman to emphasize the persistence of the past in the present.1 We complete Terdiman’s motto by adding John Bodnar’s statement that public memory is not only an inaccurate representation of the past, but is in fact constructed according to the needs of both the present and the dreamed future, as imagined by certain social groups that have obtained the power to represent
现在的过去:波兰犹太共存在文字和图像中的表现
学者们进行了重要的研究,强调犹太-波兰人的相互共存、互动和“影响”。尽管人们对多民族和多宗教的日常共存越来越感兴趣,但迄今为止,其代表性问题只受到选择性的学术关注。已经进行了一些全面的以媒体为导向的研究,比较了波兰犹太人对睦邻友好的看法,主要涉及日常共存。通过运用比较方法,讨论波兰-犹太人的日常共存在文学和艺术中是如何表现的,本节试图鼓励学者们处理这一空白,并更全面地描绘“共同生活”的现代文化记忆。“这批文章部分是2016年10月在POLIN博物馆举行的一次研讨会的结果,该研讨会探讨了“过去”在“现在”中是如何“现在”的。过去正在被呈现和代表它的人永久地重新创造,并用作构建当代的工具。“现在的过去”一词由Richard Terdiman于1993年创造,旨在强调过去在现在的持久性。1我们通过添加John Bodnar的声明来完成Terdiman的座右铭,即公共记忆不仅是对过去的不准确表述,而且实际上是根据现在和梦想中的未来的需求构建的,正如某些获得代表权的社会群体所想象的那样
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Studia Judaica
Studia Judaica Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
期刊介绍: Studia Judaica, as an organ of the Polish Association for Jewish Studies, is open to its members and all other scholars interested in a wide area of Jewish studies, such as Jewish history, literature, linguistics, archeology, culture, religion, and more. We aim to publish articles and reviews illustrating current development in a wide area of Jewish studies as conducted by the members of the Association. Our periodical is open also to non-members on assumption the article deals with an aspect of Polish-Jewish studies. By this we hope to create a representative platform of Jewish studies in and on Poland.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信