The Buckley Potteries: Recent Research and Excavation

IF 0.1 4区历史学 0 ARCHAEOLOGY

Industrial Archaeology Review Pub Date : 2020-01-02 DOI:10.1080/03090728.2020.1743593

I. Miller

引用次数: 0

Abstract

pared with the Neolithic; this is glaringly wrong and the table of five types of stone usage in prehistory should have been modified in several other ways. In term of research and publication, all too often the archaeology and history of quarrying has been the poor relation to the investigation of, and published output for, historic mining; this book helps redress the balance. Despite its imperfections, it comes highly recommended.

查看原文本刊更多论文

巴克利陶器:最近的研究和发掘

与新石器时代相比;这显然是错误的，关于史前五种石头用途的表格应该在其他几个方面进行修改。在研究和出版方面，考古学和采石史与历史采矿的调查和出版成果的关系往往很差;这本书有助于纠正这种平衡。尽管它不完美，但强烈推荐。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Industrial Archaeology Review Multiple-

CiteScore

0.40

自引率

66.70%

发文量

期刊介绍： Industrial Archaeology Review aims to publish research in industrial archaeology, which is defined as a period study embracing the tangible evidence of social, economic and technological development in the period since industrialisation, generally from the early-18th century onwards. It is a peer-reviewed academic journal, with scholarly standards of presentation, yet seeks to encourage submissions from both amateurs and professionals which will inform all those working in the field of current developments. Industrial Archaeology Review is the journal of the Association for Industrial Archaeology. Published twice a year, the focal point and common theme of its contents is the surviving evidence of industrial activity.