AN AORTIC VALVE-SPARING OPERATION: INDICATIONS, TECHNICAL ASPECTS AND RESULTS

Q4 Medicine
R. Komarov, A. Ismailbaev, P. Frolov, B. Tlisov
{"title":"AN AORTIC VALVE-SPARING OPERATION: INDICATIONS, TECHNICAL ASPECTS AND RESULTS","authors":"R. Komarov, A. Ismailbaev, P. Frolov, B. Tlisov","doi":"10.18484/2305-0047.2021.3.347","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reconstructive valve-sparing procedures on the aortic valve are one of the most dynamically developing directions in the cardiac surgery. Today cardiac surgeons all over the world prefer the aortic valve sparingoperation using autologous tissues instead biological and mechanical prosthetics. The Ross, Yakub, David, Ozaki procedures have proved their effectives, and their indicators of long-term freedom from reoperations are not inferior to classical prosthetics. In this review the authors describe the key points of the native aortic valve reconstruction. Especially, from the surgical point of view the issues of anatomy of the aortic root and the determination of the optimal «patients» for the valve-sparing procedure are discussed. The principles of reconstruction of various variants of valve development, such as uni-, bi-, three-, and quadricuspid valve anatomy, are presented in details. The approaches to aortic valve repair are described step by step, including a description of the aortic root exposure technique, options for correcting prolapse, eliminating fenestration, and annuloplasty. The evaluation of literature data showed that the overall risks of aortic valve repair in isolation or as a component of a combined intervention are nothigher than in patients with biological or mechanical prosthetics. The violation of the orientation of the commissures, the use of a pericardialcatheter, long-term prolapse, as well as expansion of the annulus fibrous are considred as an independent risk factors of significant regurgitation and reoperations in the long term after reconstruction.","PeriodicalId":38373,"journal":{"name":"Novosti Khirurgii","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Novosti Khirurgii","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18484/2305-0047.2021.3.347","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reconstructive valve-sparing procedures on the aortic valve are one of the most dynamically developing directions in the cardiac surgery. Today cardiac surgeons all over the world prefer the aortic valve sparingoperation using autologous tissues instead biological and mechanical prosthetics. The Ross, Yakub, David, Ozaki procedures have proved their effectives, and their indicators of long-term freedom from reoperations are not inferior to classical prosthetics. In this review the authors describe the key points of the native aortic valve reconstruction. Especially, from the surgical point of view the issues of anatomy of the aortic root and the determination of the optimal «patients» for the valve-sparing procedure are discussed. The principles of reconstruction of various variants of valve development, such as uni-, bi-, three-, and quadricuspid valve anatomy, are presented in details. The approaches to aortic valve repair are described step by step, including a description of the aortic root exposure technique, options for correcting prolapse, eliminating fenestration, and annuloplasty. The evaluation of literature data showed that the overall risks of aortic valve repair in isolation or as a component of a combined intervention are nothigher than in patients with biological or mechanical prosthetics. The violation of the orientation of the commissures, the use of a pericardialcatheter, long-term prolapse, as well as expansion of the annulus fibrous are considred as an independent risk factors of significant regurgitation and reoperations in the long term after reconstruction.
主动脉瓣切开术的适应证、技术方面和效果
主动脉瓣重建保留瓣膜手术是心脏外科最具发展动态的方向之一。如今,世界各地的心脏外科医生都更喜欢使用自体组织进行主动脉瓣爆裂术,而不是生物和机械修复术。Ross、Yakub、David和Ozaki手术已经证明了它们的有效性,它们的长期无需再手术的指标并不亚于经典的假肢。在这篇综述中,作者描述了天然主动脉瓣重建的关键点。特别是,从外科的角度,讨论了主动脉根部的解剖问题和瓣膜保留手术的最佳“患者”的确定。详细介绍了瓣膜发育的各种变体的重建原理,如单、双、三和四尖瓣解剖。逐步描述主动脉瓣修复的方法,包括主动脉根部暴露技术的描述、矫正脱垂、消除开窗和瓣环成形术的选择。对文献数据的评估表明,单独或作为联合干预的一部分进行主动脉瓣修复的总体风险并不比使用生物或机械假肢的患者高。违反连合方向、使用心包导管、长期脱垂以及纤维环扩张被认为是重建后长期出现严重反流和再次手术的独立风险因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Novosti Khirurgii
Novosti Khirurgii Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信